GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Who was saying this case was going to trial this year? I haven’t heard anyone say that. The ones that folks think/thought would go to trial this year are the DC case and the NY case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Whipped?
Literally nothing is happening to her.
This was a sad little sideshow, but the party is over. You’ll have to scurry off to a Hunter Biden thread 😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Who was saying this case was going to trial this year? I haven’t heard anyone say that. The ones that folks think/thought would go to trial this year are the DC case and the NY case.

Fani was. At least that is what she was hoping for.....

Georgia DA seeks Aug. 5 trial for Trump in election interference case
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/17/georgia-da-seeks-aug-5-trial-for-trump-in-election-interference-case.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Who was saying this case was going to trial this year? I haven’t heard anyone say that. The ones that folks think/thought would go to trial this year are the DC case and the NY case.

Fani was. At least that is what she was hoping for.....

Georgia DA seeks Aug. 5 trial for Trump in election interference case
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/17/georgia-da-seeks-aug-5-trial-for-trump-in-election-interference-case.html

The judge had already said no to that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Who was saying this case was going to trial this year? I haven’t heard anyone say that. The ones that folks think/thought would go to trial this year are the DC case and the NY case.

Fani was. At least that is what she was hoping for.....

Georgia DA seeks Aug. 5 trial for Trump in election interference case
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/17/georgia-da-seeks-aug-5-trial-for-trump-in-election-interference-case.html

The judge had already said no to that.

But the story is that WH was pushing to Rank to try the Trump case in the summer of this and have a conviction before the election. Now they are singing a different tune.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Who was saying this case was going to trial this year? I haven’t heard anyone say that. The ones that folks think/thought would go to trial this year are the DC case and the NY case.

Fani was. At least that is what she was hoping for.....

Georgia DA seeks Aug. 5 trial for Trump in election interference case
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/17/georgia-da-seeks-aug-5-trial-for-trump-in-election-interference-case.html

The judge had already said no to that.

But the story is that WH was pushing to Rank to try the Trump case in the summer of this and have a conviction before the election. Now they are singing a different tune.

Wut?
This post is unintelligible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Who was saying this case was going to trial this year? I haven’t heard anyone say that. The ones that folks think/thought would go to trial this year are the DC case and the NY case.

Fani was. At least that is what she was hoping for.....

Georgia DA seeks Aug. 5 trial for Trump in election interference case
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/17/georgia-da-seeks-aug-5-trial-for-trump-in-election-interference-case.html

The judge had already said no to that.

But the story is that WH was pushing to Rank to try the Trump case in the summer of this and have a conviction before the election. Now they are singing a different tune.

Wut?
This post is unintelligible.

There is some allegation that the White House was telling Fani to move the GA case along quickly and get a verdict before the election. In order to get a verdict by November, the trial had to take place in August or September at the latest.

[Anonymous]

Man even if you not a Trump supporter, you can see what they are doing to the man...even Stevie Wonder can see what they are doing!!

[Anonymous]

Maybe Fani will begin to feel like she is being 'abandoned' by Biden and the White House (now that she has become a liability) and begin contemplating a 'deal' with the GA Attorney General proactively (remember, the one who runs to the prosecutor first usually gets the best deal) to flip on Biden (or provide other information) to get a lenient disposition on any and all criminal exposure she may face in GA. Real possibility.

[Anonymous]

Anti Trumpers were salivating at the prospect of the GA trial being streamed live to all around the world in the fall.

Too bad that won't happen - Willis is saying she won't resign because (one might guess) she wants to milk this thing until the last drop since she already got exposed so she might as well milk (make) the most amount of money out of the GA case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anti Trumpers were salivating at the prospect of the GA trial being streamed live to all around the world in the fall.

Too bad that won't happen - Willis is saying she won't resign because (one might guess) she wants to milk this thing until the last drop since she already got exposed so she might as well milk (make) the most amount of money out of the GA case.

"All I want to do is this: I just want to find 246 days...."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Fani will begin to feel like she is being 'abandoned' by Biden and the White House (now that she has become a liability) and begin contemplating a 'deal' with the GA Attorney General proactively (remember, the one who runs to the prosecutor first usually gets the best deal) to flip on Biden (or provide other information) to get a lenient disposition on any and all criminal exposure she may face in GA. Real possibility.

Hahaha!

Whether you actually believe this or just bothered to take the time to write out this troll post, either way is hilarious!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Who was saying this case was going to trial this year? I haven’t heard anyone say that. The ones that folks think/thought would go to trial this year are the DC case and the NY case.

Fani was. At least that is what she was hoping for.....

Georgia DA seeks Aug. 5 trial for Trump in election interference case
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/17/georgia-da-seeks-aug-5-trial-for-trump-in-election-interference-case.html

You're proving my point. The DA estimated a four month trial, excluding jury selection, so even under this timeline the verdict would be well after the election. And when she proposed this date back in November before Roman filed his motion, the judge said that was too soon. So there was no chance that a trial would happen before the election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morally questionable? Sure. Illegal? No.

And for the millionth time, none of this absolves Trump or erases the case against him. At best it delays the case, which is really all Trump wants.

For the millionth time, none of the Trump allegations erase the case against Willis. It delays the case bigly, which is really all Trump wants.

This trial wasn’t going to happen any time soon anyway. These multi-defendant RICO trials take years to get to trial and then a year or more to actually try them. So I don’t see any delays from this as actually mattering.

That's not what the Dems were hoping and praying BEFORE Fani got her behind whipped. Some .pPolls show significant number of Independents/Moderates saying they won't vote for Trump if he is convicted. Ok I guess Dems want to have this go to trial in 2028.

Who was saying this case was going to trial this year? I haven’t heard anyone say that. The ones that folks think/thought would go to trial this year are the DC case and the NY case.

Fani was. At least that is what she was hoping for.....

Georgia DA seeks Aug. 5 trial for Trump in election interference case
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/17/georgia-da-seeks-aug-5-trial-for-trump-in-election-interference-case.html

You're proving my point. The DA estimated a four month trial, excluding jury selection, so even under this timeline the verdict would be well after the election. And when she proposed this date back in November before Roman filed his motion, the judge said that was too soon. So there was no chance that a trial would happen before the election.

But they were trying mightily to have the trial begin by October or November so it can be broadcast live.