You actually think it's anecdotal that attending an elite college improves your potential career path? Steer clear then! |
Prestigious to US News. Now run along. |
LOL! The New US News rankings?? Please Emory mom, give it up. Go enjoy all the amazingness that Atlanta has to offer you... |
If anything, this ranking of schools shows that no one recruiting on Wall Street cares one bit about US News' ranking changes to boost Public Universities due to "outcomes". |
| Four years of tuition, room and board at an elite college only to sell your soul when you get out. |
you wish |
Why can't you admit NYU underperformed. They barely make more than Fordham grads. I'm sorry but a school that swears it's peers woth the T25 should make more than their adjacent school down the street with a 50% acceptance rate. https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/search?page=0&sort=threshold_earnings:desc&search=Fordham%20University |
Enjoy your journeyman school. |
If this makes you feel better about it. Most top 25s didn't drop much. |
“Yes if you wish to avoid making money - everyone hates doing that.” |
I have no reason to doubt that the list is accurate and haven't said so. What I know is not true is that the schools on the list are the only ones that have people working on Wall Street in desirable positions. Show me data to contradict that assertion. Those who produce and/or promote these lists are oblivious to the serious damage they do to the well-being of those who use them, or they simply don't care. |
It would be foolish to 'steer clear' of amazing places to learn like those on the list. It's also foolish to believe that you must attend one of them in order to have access to desirable jobs. |
If you look at finance major earnings one year and ten years after graduation, and the ROI on the degree that takes into account the cost of the school, it's basically "Wharton and then everybody else". Or maybe Wharton, WUSTL, and then everybody else. But this is good news! It means you can attend a relatively accessible college and still do well.
|
|
I'm surprised by MIT. I thought they'd have a higher percentage of students going to quants. But perhaps this table doesn't measure that. Or perhaps MIT students are more interesting.
Also, I remain struck by how antiquated Wall Street recruiting remains. Like they're stuck in the 90s when the best and brightest did actually go to Harvard and Yale. That's a long time ago. Genuine talent is found at a much broader spectrum of schools these days. It seems like on Wall Street there is still only The Path. Clearly, a very change averse industry. |
| Nyu didnt make forbes new ivy list same as WashU, and Tufts. |