The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to that 'agreement' the tabloids were not supposed to distribute the above photo of the family eating burgers. Especially considering how it was clearly taken with a telephoto long-lens.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/16249868/william-kate-pub-lunch-george-louis-charlotte/

Guessing that there's some tensions between the broke tabloids and the Cambridges and this was a warning shot. Bring out the kids for the movie premiere or a official photocall or that 'unofficial' truce is gone.

I wonder if part of the agreement involved letting the tabloids focus their noxious attentions on other, lesser royals. As those options have become less available, this photo is a reminder of all the photos and information that they could be publishing— should they choose to do so.

I think the kids should be off limits unless they are attending clearly public events. I also think that it’s probably in the best interests of the BRF to put enough pictures out there for the people, including those in the Commonwealth countries, to feel some positive connections to George, as well as to William and Kate and even Charles.

I don’t see a picture of the family eating - just a description of what they were up to and an official photo. Reasonably, I don’t think a description violates much and this description in particular was benign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pregnancy glow?

This is my take. Her face is always so gaunt when she isn’t pregnant.

Or maybe she has decided that 10 pounds make her look 100 times better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to that 'agreement' the tabloids were not supposed to distribute the above photo of the family eating burgers. Especially considering how it was clearly taken with a telephoto long-lens.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/16249868/william-kate-pub-lunch-george-louis-charlotte/

Guessing that there's some tensions between the broke tabloids and the Cambridges and this was a warning shot. Bring out the kids for the movie premiere or a official photocall or that 'unofficial' truce is gone.

I wonder if part of the agreement involved letting the tabloids focus their noxious attentions on other, lesser royals. As those options have become less available, this photo is a reminder of all the photos and information that they could be publishing— should they choose to do so.

I think the kids should be off limits unless they are attending clearly public events. I also think that it’s probably in the best interests of the BRF to put enough pictures out there for the people, including those in the Commonwealth countries, to feel some positive connections to George, as well as to William and Kate and even Charles.

I don’t see a picture of the family eating - just a description of what they were up to and an official photo. Reasonably, I don’t think a description violates much and this description in particular was benign.

LOL they took it down. I’m guessing W/K agrees to trot the children out as commanded

[Anonymous]

First that unapproved kid picture, now the Daily Mail called Kate Duchess DoLittle? They haven't used the word for her in five years. Something is up with the tabloids and the Cambridges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First that unapproved kid picture, now the Daily Mail called Kate Duchess DoLittle? They haven't used the word for her in five years. Something is up with the tabloids and the Cambridges.

You know its tongue in cheek, right? Have you never heard of Dr. Dolittle?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First that unapproved kid picture, now the Daily Mail called Kate Duchess DoLittle? They haven't used the word for her in five years. Something is up with the tabloids and the Cambridges.

You know its tongue in cheek, right? Have you never heard of Dr. Dolittle?

The British tabloids are masters at calling someone out while seemingly to not do so. They could have used a million other descriptors about her visit, instead they chose one they know has a history of being nasty for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First that unapproved kid picture, now the Daily Mail called Kate Duchess DoLittle? They haven't used the word for her in five years. Something is up with the tabloids and the Cambridges.

You know its tongue in cheek, right? Have you never heard of Dr. Dolittle?

The British tabloids are masters at calling someone out while seemingly to not do so. They could have used a million other descriptors about her visit, instead they chose one they know has a history of being nasty for her.

You don't say!? Americans are completely devoid of sense of humor these days. You're hanging on the Daily Mail's every word like its super serious business. Lighten up.

[Anonymous]

Aside from her long vacation, Kate's actually been out much more in 2021. I'm curious what their beef is then...unless they're not making enough money on these pictures?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First that unapproved kid picture, now the Daily Mail called Kate Duchess DoLittle? They haven't used the word for her in five years. Something is up with the tabloids and the Cambridges.

You know its tongue in cheek, right? Have you never heard of Dr. Dolittle?

The British tabloids are masters at calling someone out while seemingly to not do so. They could have used a million other descriptors about her visit, instead they chose one they know has a history of being nasty for her.

You don't say!? Americans are completely devoid of sense of humor these days. You're hanging on the Daily Mail's every word like its super serious business. Lighten up.

You seem a little upset PP. Your crown loyalties coming into play? Its just a light discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Aside from her long vacation, Kate's actually been out much more in 2021. I'm curious what their beef is then...unless they're not making enough money on these pictures?

That and no one else in the family has the draw? Three babies born in the last six months to the royal family - none of the three have had a public 'photocall' and literally no one cares. One of them hasn't even had a name or a single photo announced. Its like they don't exist.

The royals need a star draw and that happens to fall just on the littles this time around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pregnancy glow?

This is my take. Her face is always so gaunt when she isn’t pregnant.

Or maybe she has decided that 10 pounds make her look 100 times better.

People have been saying this for the past 6 months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First that unapproved kid picture, now the Daily Mail called Kate Duchess DoLittle? They haven't used the word for her in five years. Something is up with the tabloids and the Cambridges.

You know its tongue in cheek, right? Have you never heard of Dr. Dolittle?

The British tabloids are masters at calling someone out while seemingly to not do so. They could have used a million other descriptors about her visit, instead they chose one they know has a history of being nasty for her.

You don't say!? Americans are completely devoid of sense of humor these days. You're hanging on the Daily Mail's every word like its super serious business. Lighten up.

You're pointing out the obvious and you completely missed the Dolittle reference. Take your own advice.

You seem a little upset PP. Your crown loyalties coming into play? Its just a light discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:First that unapproved kid picture, now the Daily Mail called Kate Duchess DoLittle? They haven't used the word for her in five years. Something is up with the tabloids and the Cambridges.

You know its tongue in cheek, right? Have you never heard of Dr. Dolittle?

The British tabloids are masters at calling someone out while seemingly to not do so. They could have used a million other descriptors about her visit, instead they chose one they know has a history of being nasty for her.

You don't say!? Americans are completely devoid of sense of humor these days. You're hanging on the Daily Mail's every word like its super serious business. Lighten up.

You seem a little upset PP. Your crown loyalties coming into play? Its just a light discussion.

Nice try, the headline is funny yet you missed the joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:First that unapproved kid picture, now the Daily Mail called Kate Duchess DoLittle? They haven't used the word for her in five years. Something is up with the tabloids and the Cambridges.

Keep Calm and Carry On, tarantula in hand.

[Anonymous]

It’s a reference to Dr. Doolittle and completely tongue in cheek.