Travis and Taylor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

As some of us age, we realize that what we thought was "our type" really isn't a good fit for us. As we gain life experience, we better recognize the qualities that better suit us in a life partner. Seems like Taylor’s taste in men has matured. You don't have to like Travis or find him attractive since you are irrelevant to the both of them.

Her tastes matured over the month between her dating that degenerate heroin addict Matt Healy and Travis Kelce?

LOL, right! And Matt–aside from being a weirdo drug addict–was another skinny, clever and creative British boy. A week later she's dating some idiot meathead...who just happens to be the face of Pfizer and Bud Light and just happens to play of the most popular team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

As some of us age, we realize that what we thought was "our type" really isn't a good fit for us. As we gain life experience, we better recognize the qualities that better suit us in a life partner. Seems like Taylor’s taste in men has matured. You don't have to like Travis or find him attractive since you are irrelevant to the both of them.

Her tastes matured over the month between her dating that degenerate heroin addict Matt Healy and Travis Kelce?

most of us can relate to rebounding with a less than ideal person, no? especially one that has been a friend for a long time. matty was just that. glad she’s moving on and seemingly happy and healthy.

At 34? No. This looks cringe and fake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

As some of us age, we realize that what we thought was "our type" really isn't a good fit for us. As we gain life experience, we better recognize the qualities that better suit us in a life partner. Seems like Taylor’s taste in men has matured. You don't have to like Travis or find him attractive since you are irrelevant to the both of them.

Her tastes matured over the month between her dating that degenerate heroin addict Matt Healy and Travis Kelce?

LOL, right! And Matt–aside from being a weirdo drug addict–was another skinny, clever and creative British boy. A week later she's dating some idiot meathead...who just happens to be the face of Pfizer and Bud Light and just happens to play of the most popular team.

Are you the “ick” poster? I didn’t realize you were also anti-vax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

As some of us age, we realize that what we thought was "our type" really isn't a good fit for us. As we gain life experience, we better recognize the qualities that better suit us in a life partner. Seems like Taylor’s taste in men has matured. You don't have to like Travis or find him attractive since you are irrelevant to the both of them.

Her tastes matured over the month between her dating that degenerate heroin addict Matt Healy and Travis Kelce?

LOL, right! And Matt–aside from being a weirdo drug addict–was another skinny, clever and creative British boy. A week later she's dating some idiot meathead...who just happens to be the face of Pfizer and Bud Light and just happens to play of the most popular team.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! You are special, I'll give you that. Poor victimized you, can't handle some television commercials without being triggered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

As some of us age, we realize that what we thought was "our type" really isn't a good fit for us. As we gain life experience, we better recognize the qualities that better suit us in a life partner. Seems like Taylor’s taste in men has matured. You don't have to like Travis or find him attractive since you are irrelevant to the both of them.

Her tastes matured over the month between her dating that degenerate heroin addict Matt Healy and Travis Kelce?

most of us can relate to rebounding with a less than ideal person, no? especially one that has been a friend for a long time. matty was just that. glad she’s moving on and seemingly happy and healthy.

At 34? No. This looks cringe and fake.

DP - she was just coming out of a six YEAR relationship. You think divorcees in their 40s and 50s don't have rebounds like this? Pfft.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

No he is not.

[Anonymous]

So adorable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

NP. I feel like a tinfoil hat is required to decipher this comment

Why aren’t masters worthless if every artist can just re-record their songs? The whole Taylor’s version narrative is obviously fake. She’s in on it. And this sham relationship is all tied into it. NFL suddenly has rights to blast her songs across all media.

Because most artists don’t write their own songs, thus don’t retain copyright. If you don’t have the copyright you can’t just re-record without permission. She writes 100% of her own music. Sometimes with a co-writer. When she moved labels she negotiated that she would own her masters going forward, and universal republic agreed. So her new stuff is hers, as are re records (Taylor’s version).

Not only that, how many artists have fans that are willing to buy a re-record, and not just one but several copies of each because they come in different colors!

Did you know there's a run on CD players this holiday season b/c Taylor released CDs and kids/young adults don't own one? Another way she's boosting the economy. Brought back the CD?? Who else could do that?

This is a bragging point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Taylor said they'd been together for a decent amount of time before she showed up at that first game. They are much further along in this relationship.

Don't understand people's nastiness. If you're not into it, no problem. Plenty of other threads to weigh in on.

Is anyone innocent enough here to think celebs go on their first date a broadcast it to the world? Or when they announce their divorce it was decided that day? Both instances happen months before we know it. And I think Deuxmoi had it right. The relationship started in July.

Another example when Jen Aniston went public with Justin Theroux. They had been seeing each other for months while he still had his live in girlfriend back in NYC.

No. I’m more surprised they would feel the need to time stamp it at all.

I was taken aback when Taylor used a marketing phrase for her relationship. She said they did not "hard launch" their relationship at the first football game she attended. The idea that one would ever "hard launch" a relationship seemed silly and off to me. But that's how she thinks so...

I do like her music and think she and her team are smart marketers and business people. I'm not hating on her here. It's just I wouldn't want to see a romantic relationship as something I "launch."

This is the Gen Z lingo. Normies use it too. Get with it.

Taylor is 34 years old. That is a millennial, not gen Z. Still talking like that at her age is super cringe.

I am 47 and use it. Oh well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

NP. I feel like a tinfoil hat is required to decipher this comment

Why aren’t masters worthless if every artist can just re-record their songs? The whole Taylor’s version narrative is obviously fake. She’s in on it. And this sham relationship is all tied into it. NFL suddenly has rights to blast her songs across all media.

Because most artists don’t write their own songs, thus don’t retain copyright. If you don’t have the copyright you can’t just re-record without permission. She writes 100% of her own music. Sometimes with a co-writer. When she moved labels she negotiated that she would own her masters going forward, and universal republic agreed. So her new stuff is hers, as are re records (Taylor’s version).

Not only that, how many artists have fans that are willing to buy a re-record, and not just one but several copies of each because they come in different colors!

Did you know there's a run on CD players this holiday season b/c Taylor released CDs and kids/young adults don't own one? Another way she's boosting the economy. Brought back the CD?? Who else could do that?

This is a bragging point?

Huh? It's marketing genuis, but the point is that not many artists have fans willing to do this. Most artists would lose $ on a re-record.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

NP. I feel like a tinfoil hat is required to decipher this comment

Why aren’t masters worthless if every artist can just re-record their songs? The whole Taylor’s version narrative is obviously fake. She’s in on it. And this sham relationship is all tied into it. NFL suddenly has rights to blast her songs across all media.

Because most artists don’t write their own songs, thus don’t retain copyright. If you don’t have the copyright you can’t just re-record without permission. She writes 100% of her own music. Sometimes with a co-writer. When she moved labels she negotiated that she would own her masters going forward, and universal republic agreed. So her new stuff is hers, as are re records (Taylor’s version).

Not only that, how many artists have fans that are willing to buy a re-record, and not just one but several copies of each because they come in different colors!

Did you know there's a run on CD players this holiday season b/c Taylor released CDs and kids/young adults don't own one? Another way she's boosting the economy. Brought back the CD?? Who else could do that?

This is a bragging point?

But but, if you buy FOUR albums, they will make a CLOCK when you put the covers together! Isn’t that cool!?!?

Cue Swifties buying four albums of the same music…

😱

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

NP. I feel like a tinfoil hat is required to decipher this comment

Why aren’t masters worthless if every artist can just re-record their songs? The whole Taylor’s version narrative is obviously fake. She’s in on it. And this sham relationship is all tied into it. NFL suddenly has rights to blast her songs across all media.

Because most artists don’t write their own songs, thus don’t retain copyright. If you don’t have the copyright you can’t just re-record without permission. She writes 100% of her own music. Sometimes with a co-writer. When she moved labels she negotiated that she would own her masters going forward, and universal republic agreed. So her new stuff is hers, as are re records (Taylor’s version).

Not only that, how many artists have fans that are willing to buy a re-record, and not just one but several copies of each because they come in different colors!

Did you know there's a run on CD players this holiday season b/c Taylor released CDs and kids/young adults don't own one? Another way she's boosting the economy. Brought back the CD?? Who else could do that?

This is a bragging point?

But but, if you buy FOUR albums, they will make a CLOCK when you put the covers together! Isn’t that cool!?!?

Cue Swifties buying four albums of the same music…

😱

You sure know a lot of details for someone making fun...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

NP. I feel like a tinfoil hat is required to decipher this comment

Why aren’t masters worthless if every artist can just re-record their songs? The whole Taylor’s version narrative is obviously fake. She’s in on it. And this sham relationship is all tied into it. NFL suddenly has rights to blast her songs across all media.

Because most artists don’t write their own songs, thus don’t retain copyright. If you don’t have the copyright you can’t just re-record without permission. She writes 100% of her own music. Sometimes with a co-writer. When she moved labels she negotiated that she would own her masters going forward, and universal republic agreed. So her new stuff is hers, as are re records (Taylor’s version).

Not only that, how many artists have fans that are willing to buy a re-record, and not just one but several copies of each because they come in different colors!

Did you know there's a run on CD players this holiday season b/c Taylor released CDs and kids/young adults don't own one? Another way she's boosting the economy. Brought back the CD?? Who else could do that?

This is a bragging point?

Huh? It's marketing genuis, but the point is that not many artists have fans willing to do this. Most artists would lose $ on a re-record.

This is kind of mind boggling to me. So it is a bragging point that you are such good little consumers, you must buy the same thing in every color? I mean Cereal companies and McDonalds have been telling us to “collect em all” for years. As kids we used to make fun of the collect them all mentality, but now it seems you see it as marketing genius and think highly of people who fall for it.

Gullibility of commercialism and advertising isn’t something i would ever brag about, but hey it is a big world and congrats to you!

[Anonymous]

Another public kiss... on the cheek.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another public kiss... on the cheek.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/nfl/article-12857953/amp/Taylor-Swift-Travis-Kelce-pictured-kissing-lips.html