Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift engaged!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone with a high EQ is able to regulate their emotions and help others regulate emotions. They read emotions well and can give good responses.

That's a narrow view of EQ, which can also include empathy and self-awareness.

Of course, that was off the top of my head. High EQ still isn’t the same as charisma.

Travis has both and Taylor is attracted to it. I get it.

He always looks like he is smirking AT the person, ready to make fun of them, how is that empathetic?

My friends and I grew up making fun of each and still do as that’s not a good barometer you’re using. We also have tremendous empathy and connect well with everyone

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Record execs duped her fans into rebuying all of her old albums under the guise of the masters being stolen and she tricked the big bad execs by re-recording everything. Y’all are hopeless saps.

Do your research first before responding. You’re wrong on why she recorded them

NP. She recorded them to devalue her old masters. Duped her fans into buying them with the sob story that they were bought out from under her. Gotta hand it to the petty b****.

Are the feminists still here with us? Or are we just giving up the ruse that they were ever for women?

Wait a minute- are you saying you can only be a feminist if you support Taylor? Or only if you support all women regardless of principle?

Or are you saying you bought into her grift that by buying her albums again again you were support women against big bad men?

I don’t need to support all women when I disagree with them principle nor do I have to support Taylor swift to be a feminist. Why (other than you bought her crap) would you ever think you have to support all women even if you disagree with them?

NP. No one is forcing you to buy her music so I don’t get where the animosity is coming from. I’ve never purchased a single item but still like her music. It’s possible. But to your other point, yeah kind of. If no one is getting hurt and it’s all just a business model that hurts no one but you just happen to disagree with, yeah I still think women should support women who are changing the status quo. And she has and did. They literally teach business law classes based on her approach. I think any feminist would support that success, as well as her advice and help she gives to upcoming artists. But whatever.

I have read she has actually hurt up coming artists with the way her handled the business. Here is a law school talking about how contracts have changed for the worse for artists because of how Taylor’s team handled the situation. She just made the system more capitalist.

https://uclawreview.org/2024/03/27/look-what-you-made-them-do-the-impact-of-taylor-swifts-re-recording-project-on-record-labels/

And Harvard: https://hls.harvard.edu/today/how-taylor-swift-changed-the-copyright-game-by-remaking-her-own-music/

In response, record companies are now trying to prohibit re-recordings for 20 or 30 years, not just two or three. And this has become a key part of contract negotiations. “Will they get 30 years? Probably not, if the lawyer is competent. But they want to make sure that the artist’s vocal cords are not in good shape by the time they get around to re-recording.”
This, he noted, begged the question of why an artist would even want to sign a record contract in the age of TikTok and Spotify. “Number one, there is the pride involved. If you were The Who in the ’60s, you could trash a hotel room and the label would clean up the mess. Of course it would come out of future royalties, but they would do it. But what you have to ask yourself is, is it worth it?”
This may not be an issue for most artists who sign to record labels — but it likely will be for a select few.
“Very few people have the power of a Taylor Swift, but nobody knows who the next Taylor Swift will be,” Greenstein said. “So, if you are a lawyer, you will represent your client zealously.”

Not that many artists have a stock broker/ financial analyst as a Dad who is backing their career. Taylor was able to have her career because of her Dad’s money. Apparently he even helped negotiate Taylor out of the Blake Lively court case. I don’t see that as particularly feminist.

What’s 100% anti feminist is continuing to give her father credit for her career, over and over and over.

Amen to that! She has her own team of lawyers, accountants, etc - who work for HER. So funny that the PP actually thinks she's a little girl whose daddy needs to come to her rescue.

Strange that he is still fighting her battles, rescuing her and trying to keep her out of trouble.

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/taylor-swift-insider-who-leaked-blake-livelys-alleged-threat-to-release-pop-stars-private-texts-revealed/news-story/de51dbf30db4c913da9ec6da133141da

Oh, I get it now. You're the kind of imbecile who believes anonymous sources and the Daily Mail. Enough said!

Also, he’s her manager so it’s his job to help fight her battles but the poster you’re responding too is just fixated on hating Taylor. It’s such a bizarre obsession these haters have

DP. Agreed, but actually, Scott Swift is not her manager. Her management team is called 13 Management and was co-founded by TS and her mother.

So who is her manager? Herself? Her mom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully she gets out of this somehow. I just feel like she can and has done so much better than Travis. I also don’t get how tom Hiddleston gave her the ick with being too eager to go to the Grammys or whatever yet she’s marrying probably the thirstiest fame whores alive.

I personally think Tom Hiddleston is sexy as f* but he’s not everyone’s type. Travis OTOH is a smokin’ hot mountain man.

Who are you people? Literally nobody finds Travis smokin hot. He's butt ugly, dumb, and goofy.

He’s not my type but I would not call him dumb. I’ve listened to his podcast, and he’s able to be personable and connect with people. He did a good job on SNL. He strikes me as someone who can take a joke and has a decent sense of humor.

Exactly. His EQ is off the charts. He’s excellent at connecting with people

Ohhhh, now I see why you think Taylor has high EQ. EQ and charisma are not the same thing. They are different. Someone with a high EQ is able to regulate their emotions and help others regulate emotions. They read emotions well and can give good responses. Someone who is charismatic draws people in and can be magnetic socially, but may not have the longer term emotional regulation skills to continue building relationships.
Trump for example reads the room well and is charismatic, but his EQ is low because he doesn’t regulate himself well. Just to illustrate the difference, I’m not drawing a direct comparison.

I disagree. If you ever Listen to his podcast, he has tremendous emotional intelligence and I also don’t think Trump reads the room well at all.

Yeah, I’m not going to listen to his podcast. How do you think Trump got elected if he isn’t a great showman/ has charisma?

This is the problem. You don’t have to listen to his podcast because that’s up to you but you’re in no position to judge his EQ when your whole narrative is 15 second snippets you see

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From Daddy Swift. He notes all the work and money he has put into Taylor.

https://www.reddit.com/r/travisandtaylor/comments/1csjpar/in_case_you_all_arent_familiar_with_the_infamous/

Honey, this is from 2008. Taylor Swift was - wait for it - 17 years old. Could you be a bigger moron?

Omg. You are a bully!

Nothing has changed with daddy.

DP. What has changed is how she has more control over her career than Daddy. Remember, it was her dad that warned her against saying anything political and she didn’t listen to him.

[Anonymous]

If anyone has a strong say in how Taylor manages herself it is Tree Paine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Jason Kelce isn't materially different from his brother appearance-wise, endured the same amount of bodily wear-and-tear, but is somehow considered more "well-liked."

Jason is not intelligent by any stretch but he's easily 20 IQ points higher than Travis. Travis is dumb as a brick. Jason is far more charismatic, too. Travis is just so........ ick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully she gets out of this somehow. I just feel like she can and has done so much better than Travis. I also don’t get how tom Hiddleston gave her the ick with being too eager to go to the Grammys or whatever yet she’s marrying probably the thirstiest fame whores alive.

I personally think Tom Hiddleston is sexy as f* but he’s not everyone’s type. Travis OTOH is a smokin’ hot mountain man.

Who are you people? Literally nobody finds Travis smokin hot. He's butt ugly, dumb, and goofy.

Nobody does? Taylor does. Do better

I think Taylor is a socially stunted weirdo child star who does what her dad says, including "date this football jock." All child stars basically all turn out crazy / stunted when they get to middle aged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jason Kelce is arguably more of a legend with Philadelphia sports fans than Travis Kelce is with those in KC.

I like Jason but he’s had more drunken meathead moments that you guys seem to just Travis by. Have you ever heard the story of his first date with his wife?

They're both low class buffoons. But it's obvious to anyone who's heard them communicate for two minutes that Jason is far more intelligent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jason Kelce is arguably more of a legend with Philadelphia sports fans than Travis Kelce is with those in KC.

I like Jason but he’s had more drunken meathead moments that you guys seem to just Travis by. Have you ever heard the story of his first date with his wife?

They're both low class buffoons. But it's obvious to anyone who's heard them communicate for two minutes that Jason is far more intelligent.

Calling someone low class…. Do you not get the irony in your post because I would assume most people around you feel that you’re low class with your judgmental attitude.
Taylor has been so generous with her money and showed class her whole life. What have you actually done for anyone??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jason Kelce is arguably more of a legend with Philadelphia sports fans than Travis Kelce is with those in KC.

I like Jason but he’s had more drunken meathead moments that you guys seem to just Travis by. Have you ever heard the story of his first date with his wife?

They're both low class buffoons. But it's obvious to anyone who's heard them communicate for two minutes that Jason is far more intelligent.

Well, Jason did you use a gay slur, caught on video when he got angry with aggressive fan. I like Jason but that wasn’t a very intelligent thing to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Record execs duped her fans into rebuying all of her old albums under the guise of the masters being stolen and she tricked the big bad execs by re-recording everything. Y’all are hopeless saps.

Do your research first before responding. You’re wrong on why she recorded them

NP. She recorded them to devalue her old masters. Duped her fans into buying them with the sob story that they were bought out from under her. Gotta hand it to the petty b****.

Are the feminists still here with us? Or are we just giving up the ruse that they were ever for women?

Wait a minute- are you saying you can only be a feminist if you support Taylor? Or only if you support all women regardless of principle?

Or are you saying you bought into her grift that by buying her albums again again you were support women against big bad men?

I don’t need to support all women when I disagree with them principle nor do I have to support Taylor swift to be a feminist. Why (other than you bought her crap) would you ever think you have to support all women even if you disagree with them?

NP. No one is forcing you to buy her music so I don’t get where the animosity is coming from. I’ve never purchased a single item but still like her music. It’s possible. But to your other point, yeah kind of. If no one is getting hurt and it’s all just a business model that hurts no one but you just happen to disagree with, yeah I still think women should support women who are changing the status quo. And she has and did. They literally teach business law classes based on her approach. I think any feminist would support that success, as well as her advice and help she gives to upcoming artists. But whatever.

I have read she has actually hurt up coming artists with the way her handled the business. Here is a law school talking about how contracts have changed for the worse for artists because of how Taylor’s team handled the situation. She just made the system more capitalist.

https://uclawreview.org/2024/03/27/look-what-you-made-them-do-the-impact-of-taylor-swifts-re-recording-project-on-record-labels/

And Harvard: https://hls.harvard.edu/today/how-taylor-swift-changed-the-copyright-game-by-remaking-her-own-music/

In response, record companies are now trying to prohibit re-recordings for 20 or 30 years, not just two or three. And this has become a key part of contract negotiations. “Will they get 30 years? Probably not, if the lawyer is competent. But they want to make sure that the artist’s vocal cords are not in good shape by the time they get around to re-recording.”
This, he noted, begged the question of why an artist would even want to sign a record contract in the age of TikTok and Spotify. “Number one, there is the pride involved. If you were The Who in the ’60s, you could trash a hotel room and the label would clean up the mess. Of course it would come out of future royalties, but they would do it. But what you have to ask yourself is, is it worth it?”
This may not be an issue for most artists who sign to record labels — but it likely will be for a select few.
“Very few people have the power of a Taylor Swift, but nobody knows who the next Taylor Swift will be,” Greenstein said. “So, if you are a lawyer, you will represent your client zealously.”

Not that many artists have a stock broker/ financial analyst as a Dad who is backing their career. Taylor was able to have her career because of her Dad’s money. Apparently he even helped negotiate Taylor out of the Blake Lively court case. I don’t see that as particularly feminist.

What’s 100% anti feminist is continuing to give her father credit for her career, over and over and over.

Amen to that! She has her own team of lawyers, accountants, etc - who work for HER. So funny that the PP actually thinks she's a little girl whose daddy needs to come to her rescue.

Strange that he is still fighting her battles, rescuing her and trying to keep her out of trouble.

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/taylor-swift-insider-who-leaked-blake-livelys-alleged-threat-to-release-pop-stars-private-texts-revealed/news-story/de51dbf30db4c913da9ec6da133141da

Oh, I get it now. You're the kind of imbecile who believes anonymous sources and the Daily Mail. Enough said!

Also, he’s her manager so it’s his job to help fight her battles but the poster you’re responding too is just fixated on hating Taylor. It’s such a bizarre obsession these haters have

DP. Agreed, but actually, Scott Swift is not her manager. Her management team is called 13 Management and was co-founded by TS and her mother.

So who is her manager? Herself? Her mom?

I just googled, looks like the company is made up of people named Erica, Robert, Frank, who are not related to Taylor, plus her family. And as others have said her publicist Tree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone with a high EQ is able to regulate their emotions and help others regulate emotions. They read emotions well and can give good responses.

That's a narrow view of EQ, which can also include empathy and self-awareness.

Of course, that was off the top of my head. High EQ still isn’t the same as charisma.

Travis has both and Taylor is attracted to it. I get it.

He always looks like he is smirking AT the person, ready to make fun of them, how is that empathetic?

My friends and I grew up making fun of each and still do as that’s not a good barometer you’re using. We also have tremendous empathy and connect well with everyone

“we have tremendous empathy and connect well with everyone.” I can completely see that just by your post!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jason Kelce is arguably more of a legend with Philadelphia sports fans than Travis Kelce is with those in KC.

Not true. Travis has 3 Super Bowls with Kc and will be a hall of famer, just like his brother.

DP. I feel like this is more a testament to Philly sports fans than actual accolades.