Travis and Taylor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

Tell us more about how you know nothing. But please continue the ignorant commenting because it's rather entertaining.

I’m embarrassed for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

NP. I feel like a tinfoil hat is required to decipher this comment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

NP. I feel like a tinfoil hat is required to decipher this comment

Why aren’t masters worthless if every artist can just re-record their songs? The whole Taylor’s version narrative is obviously fake. She’s in on it. And this sham relationship is all tied into it. NFL suddenly has rights to blast her songs across all media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

unattractive OR underachieving

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are both overexposed at this point and I do not really care about their romance.

In fact, like TomKat twenty yrs ago, I am already sick + tired of hearing about these two. 😤

She and their relationship are being shoved down our throats because 2024 is a general election year. She clearly made some sort of backroom deal to get her masters back.

Wut?
She didn’t get her masters back……

DP. I think she has her masters from Reputation forward and has the masters to the re-recorded music she has released.

Yeah, something sketchy happened and the public was never told the full truth. It clearly wasn't just oh there's this one simple trick to take back your masters, you just have to re-record your songs! As if everyone wouldn't do that. Her masters were leverage over her. Now she's out here dating a vaccine spokesman, a dimwit ogre at that, when she has dated gorgeous clever British boys for the last 20 years.

NP. I feel like a tinfoil hat is required to decipher this comment

Why aren’t masters worthless if every artist can just re-record their songs? The whole Taylor’s version narrative is obviously fake. She’s in on it. And this sham relationship is all tied into it. NFL suddenly has rights to blast her songs across all media.

So…yeah. Tinfoil hat.

[Anonymous]

They are such an inspiration to me as a couple…it really brings me to tears…a love like that u can’t find everyday!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Taylor said they'd been together for a decent amount of time before she showed up at that first game. They are much further along in this relationship.

Don't understand people's nastiness. If you're not into it, no problem. Plenty of other threads to weigh in on.

Is anyone innocent enough here to think celebs go on their first date a broadcast it to the world? Or when they announce their divorce it was decided that day? Both instances happen months before we know it. And I think Deuxmoi had it right. The relationship started in July.

Another example when Jen Aniston went public with Justin Theroux. They had been seeing each other for months while he still had his live in girlfriend back in NYC.

No. I’m more surprised they would feel the need to time stamp it at all.

I was taken aback when Taylor used a marketing phrase for her relationship. She said they did not "hard launch" their relationship at the first football game she attended. The idea that one would ever "hard launch" a relationship seemed silly and off to me. But that's how she thinks so...

I do like her music and think she and her team are smart marketers and business people. I'm not hating on her here. It's just I wouldn't want to see a romantic relationship as something I "launch."

This is the Gen Z lingo. Normies use it too. Get with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Taylor said they'd been together for a decent amount of time before she showed up at that first game. They are much further along in this relationship.

Don't understand people's nastiness. If you're not into it, no problem. Plenty of other threads to weigh in on.

Is anyone innocent enough here to think celebs go on their first date a broadcast it to the world? Or when they announce their divorce it was decided that day? Both instances happen months before we know it. And I think Deuxmoi had it right. The relationship started in July.

Another example when Jen Aniston went public with Justin Theroux. They had been seeing each other for months while he still had his live in girlfriend back in NYC.

No. I’m more surprised they would feel the need to time stamp it at all.

I was taken aback when Taylor used a marketing phrase for her relationship. She said they did not "hard launch" their relationship at the first football game she attended. The idea that one would ever "hard launch" a relationship seemed silly and off to me. But that's how she thinks so...

I do like her music and think she and her team are smart marketers and business people. I'm not hating on her here. It's just I wouldn't want to see a romantic relationship as something I "launch."

This is the Gen Z lingo. Normies use it too. Get with it.

Taylor is 34 years old. That is a millennial, not gen Z. Still talking like that at her age is super cringe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting that Taylor said they'd been together for a decent amount of time before she showed up at that first game. They are much further along in this relationship.

Don't understand people's nastiness. If you're not into it, no problem. Plenty of other threads to weigh in on.

Is anyone innocent enough here to think celebs go on their first date a broadcast it to the world? Or when they announce their divorce it was decided that day? Both instances happen months before we know it. And I think Deuxmoi had it right. The relationship started in July.

Another example when Jen Aniston went public with Justin Theroux. They had been seeing each other for months while he still had his live in girlfriend back in NYC.

No. I’m more surprised they would feel the need to time stamp it at all.

I was taken aback when Taylor used a marketing phrase for her relationship. She said they did not "hard launch" their relationship at the first football game she attended. The idea that one would ever "hard launch" a relationship seemed silly and off to me. But that's how she thinks so...

I do like her music and think she and her team are smart marketers and business people. I'm not hating on her here. It's just I wouldn't want to see a romantic relationship as something I "launch."

This is the Gen Z lingo. Normies use it too. Get with it.

Taylor is 34 years old. That is a millennial, not gen Z. Still talking like that at her age is super cringe.

I think so too.

[Anonymous]

I ship Taylor and Travis but I'm also a Bills fan, so I found it HILARIOUS when Kelce made an amazing play (caught a pass and then passed it to another player to run it in) for a game winning touchdown tonight, only to have it called back for a neutral zone infraction (not Kelce).

The quick pan to Taylor in the suite and then the quick cut away when the score got called back made me laugh.

Go Bills!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

As some of us age, we realize that what we thought was "our type" really isn't a good fit for us. As we gain life experience, we better recognize the qualities that better suit us in a life partner. Seems like Taylor’s taste in men has matured. You don't have to like Travis or find him attractive since you are irrelevant to the both of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't get the people who say this is fake because she's way out of his league. This isn't 2013, she is about to be 34 years old. Everyone knows a single and childless woman in their mid 30s who settled down with an unattractive or underachieving guy. Slim pickings at that age, plus hormones and the biological clock can lead to poor decisions.

Travis Kelce is not an underachieving guy.

Super Bowl champion, for one thing!

He is the ugliest and dumbest guy she’s ever dated.

Please - he’s all muscle and looks good. You would be dying to get him in your bed