Disagree. You are misinterpreting the data. Go look at the pages which show the pie chart of percent of applications vs percent of admissions by race. The white percentage is pretty close to percentage of those applying. Seems to me that your goal is to pit Asians against whites. I'm not for pitting any group against any other, but anyone who claims the purpose of these changes is not to admit more Black and Hispanic students doesn't understand what they are doing. And, remember, the Fairfax NAACP has been complaining about TJ for years--since long before Asians were the majority at TJ. |
| And, yet, no wholesale changes (with 3 weeks of notice) were ever implemented. Why could that be?? |
The new system is racist against Asian students since it was specifically designed to lower Asian students and increase black and Hispanic students. |
FCPS has no plans to deal with the consequences of large numbers of freshmen who will flunk out of TJ (TJ has minimum 3.0 unweighted gpa requirement) and have their gpa ruined for college under this lottery system. Morons not addressing the root of the problem- improving the elementary schools in poorer neighborhoods. |
|
A public school should be educating a representative cross section of the public and providing opportunities for kids who have interest and aptitude. It's fine with me if TJ is not the same or as "elite" as it has been. I don't want my public tax dollars used as it has been used. I would prefer to have it be a magnet STEM school that finds and develops talent.
If you want the most elite school that is so far above and beyond --- then send your kid to a private school that meets your expectations. 90% of the people freaking out about this are interested in TJ for their kids only has a conduit for college and the life the tiger parents have planned out for their cubs. There are truly exceptional kids, but they are a smaller group. Bravo to the state and district for trying to change TJ. |
Tell me with more specifics how the current system took race into consideration. IF some one tells truth the democrats want them to be silenced by calling them racists. Shame on your tactics. With out resorting to name calling just tell us how race mattered in the current process ? how telling that race did not matter inthe current process warranted to be termed as racist unless you are approaching everything with a racist view? |
| If they were serious about eliminating disparities, they would examine the AAP program. Fairfax County has the nation’s 10th largest public school system, with more than 188,000 students. Of those, 25 percent are Hispanic and 10 percent are African-American. But over the last 10 years, blacks and Hispanics have constituted only 12 percent of the students deemed eligible for Level IV, the most advanced academic program. Notably, the data show that when black and Hispanic students do submit intelligence tests, they are just as likely to gain admission as their white and Asian counterparts. When these students are excluded from the AAP program, the probability that they will have completed Algebra 1 by 8th grade is lower, and their ability to succeed at TJ is compromised. Do these politicians have the courage to examine biases in the AAP program? |
| ... only AS a conduit... |
They did examine the AAP program with several experts who wrote a long report and discussed it at a meeting. I think it was last spring. Wake up. |
|
How do you know who 90% of the commenters are? Such baseless statements used to justify your opinion makes your opinion suspect.
I am still waiting for Langley to be adjusted the FCPS demographics and HS sports teams to be based on a lottery. |
Yes, you are correct. some form of the proposed system was in effect some time before and it badly affected the URMs. Glad you brought this up. |
Why are you so racist to undermine Asian kids? |
Not true at all. Large numbers of students won't flunk out of a changed high school. |
DP. This change will benefit Asian students too. |
Who says they have to maintain that minimum GPA policy in perpetuity? So many straw-man arguments from the obvious defenders of an indefensible status quo. |