The protocol that best keeps kids safe is to actually appropriately support their needs. Kids don’t just randomly act up. There is always a reason, and most often, the reason is that their needs aren’t being met. We shouldn’t punish disabled kids for adult failures |
I’m not going to read that article. But I will tell you that I was definitely put on a quiet room when I was a kid. I don’t remember what grade but I graduated in 1991 here in NoVA and we definitely had quiet rooms in our schools. |
For context, I was going through a very difficult time at home and have been over medicated for depression and just kind of lost it one day. I wasn’t violent I just couldn’t stop shrieking. It was the kid equivalent of a nervous break down. I was hospitalized after that. Funny thing is that they took me off of all of my medication to reset. Gave me a little therapy and realized it was mostly my home environment causing the issues. We have a lot of family therapy, and I went home after awhile. my parents eventually got sober and started therapy. I was the canary in the coal mine. |
Spoken like someone who has never met a child with a disruptive mood dysregulation disorder. |
I went to school in the 1980s. I can still remember a kid losing his €%#} regularly in classrooms and it was traumatizing for the rest of us. I don’t necessarily support quiet rooms but subjected other young children to rage is also very problematic. |
I’m very curious what people think should be done instead. School isn’t a psych ward and other students and staff have a right to remain safe during these “incidents” or whatever. |
The PP is exactly right. There is too much money spent on American public school education for such mediocre results. The last thing SN departments need is more money. They already take up so much while the gifted kids who will actually benefit our future society are neglected. I support higher salaries for teachers. If the general public knew how much $$ in public education is wasted on admin and frivolous contracts resulting from special interest lobbying, they would be horrified. |
As the parent of 2 “gifted” kids (I really hate that term), I agree that they are often neglected in public schools. I agree that too much money is spent for mediocre results. I DISAGREE that too much is spent on kids with special needs or that that money is wasted. I would support a tax interest if I thought the money was necessary for and would be used on behalf of improving education for children (be they gifted, on-level, or special meeds). However, my experience in a county whose schools are comparatively well-funded is that regardless of how much money we give them, the educational benefits will be minimal. MCPS spends an enormous amount on every high-tech/glitzy extra they can think of. They devote a significant effort to PR. They have a reputation for preferring litigation to defend lawsuits from special needs families for services, rather than providing appropriate services to begin with. The money that does actually go to education, too often goes towards resources of questionable value. For years they churned out a lousy curriculum, using our kids as guinea pigs. I’m hoping that the critical report from the curriculum audit will lead to improvements, but if the personnel in the curriculum department have any input in selecting and implementing a new curriculum, I very much fear we’ll get another ineffective curriculum that aligns with their preferences. (I desperately hope I’m wrong and we can get some established curriculum that are content rich and have already been proven effective elsewhere.) I think education is the very best investment society can make. I’m willing to pay more to improve education. I am NOT willing to pay more so that a school district that is more concerned with its own prestige than in the actual process of education can have more money to waste. |
Arlington Science Focus had on. Not all parents are aware. |
x1000000 I am shocked that the school suspended him, because in FCPS his parents would threaten to sue, and they would keep him in a system that is clearly not working, at the peril of everyone else. |
We don't have enough staff to deal with students like this. I had a student who scratched my eye when she was having a tantrum. I went to take a pencil out of her hand so she wouldn't hurt anyone and she scratched my eye with it. She then grabbed my arm to get it back. The result was bruises all over me. I texted everyone on our group text- teacher next door (so I could send my kids to her), school psych, social worker, admin, etc). Nobody showed up because of the other out of control students (in general ed classes). |
So what do you want the teachers and other students do when your child is violent and you don’t want him removed from the classroom? They just suck it up and deal? |
+1 Those kids are there to get an education, not wait for your snowflake to go off again. |
Special ed teachers are trained to handle some of these issues but not all, especially now that violent kids are allowed to be mainstreamed. Regular teachers are not trained for this. You’re going to have to pony up more money if you expect all teachers to deal with this in addition to teaching every day. Give me a break. Why don’t you home school your violent kid since You know all the right things to do and stop expecting strangers to manage them. |
some people are crazy . |