Is Ocasio-Cortez pretending to be working class when she’s really not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many Democrats do not like her. We think she’s smart, a great dancer, charming, even, but she doesn’t understand basics concepts about how government works, she’s got pie-in-the sky ideas like a 70% tax bracket, she inflates her self almost like Eva Peron or Margaret Thatcher - start working, learn, then talk incessantly. If Hakim Jeffries is too conservative for her, if she wants to primary him, we are all effed. Different districts need different representatives. We can’t have these ideological purity tests over who’s left or progressive enough. She’s promoting this holier than though attitude about disrupting the Democratic Party - can’t we disrupt the Donald first?

You understand nothing. Fellow Democrat. The tax rate on highest earners - on a portion of earnings - was 90% in Eisenhower’s day, and around 70% during JFK’s tenure. She’s talking about looking at Reaganomics critically,as is Warren. As much or more to the point, the criticisms of her have been actual misogyny in action - creepy pics of her taken to try and prove she lied about financial anxiety based on her outfits, the shithead argument advanced here that she was somehow obligated to debate overrated dunce Ben Shapiro, and now all this deeply dumb fogey panic about how she’s the next coming of Stalin with the cult of personality bullshit. She voted for Pelosi and seems eager to learn. Let it breathe.

You use this black and white rhetoric at your peril. We can both believe Ben Shapiro is a dick who wet dreams about her AND think she’s a show pony when we need workhorses. Some of the criticism around her is accurate. We’re not going back to a 70% rate- have you seen the crazy new tax cuts?

We are going to have workhorses. Stop prattling on about AOC and you’ll have an easier time noticing them.

You lost me at prattle and “you understand nothing.” Were you trying to make a point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many Democrats do not like her. We think she’s smart, a great dancer, charming, even, but she doesn’t understand basics concepts about how government works, she’s got pie-in-the sky ideas like a 70% tax bracket, she inflates her self almost like Eva Peron or Margaret Thatcher - start working, learn, then talk incessantly. If Hakim Jeffries is too conservative for her, if she wants to primary him, we are all effed. Different districts need different representatives. We can’t have these ideological purity tests over who’s left or progressive enough. She’s promoting this holier than though attitude about disrupting the Democratic Party - can’t we disrupt the Donald first?

You understand nothing. Fellow Democrat. The tax rate on highest earners - on a portion of earnings - was 90% in Eisenhower’s day, and around 70% during JFK’s tenure. She’s talking about looking at Reaganomics critically,as is Warren. As much or more to the point, the criticisms of her have been actual misogyny in action - creepy pics of her taken to try and prove she lied about financial anxiety based on her outfits, the shithead argument advanced here that she was somehow obligated to debate overrated dunce Ben Shapiro, and now all this deeply dumb fogey panic about how she’s the next coming of Stalin with the cult of personality bullshit. She voted for Pelosi and seems eager to learn. Let it breathe.

You use this black and white rhetoric at your peril. We can both believe Ben Shapiro is a dick who wet dreams about her AND think she’s a show pony when we need workhorses. Some of the criticism around her is accurate. We’re not going back to a 70% rate- have you seen the crazy new tax cuts?

We are going to have workhorses. Stop prattling on about AOC and you’ll have an easier time noticing them.

You lost me at prattle and “you understand nothing.” Were you trying to make a point?

Nope -def a misogynist Bernie bro.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many Democrats do not like her. We think she’s smart, a great dancer, charming, even, but she doesn’t understand basics concepts about how government works, she’s got pie-in-the sky ideas like a 70% tax bracket, she inflates her self almost like Eva Peron or Margaret Thatcher - start working, learn, then talk incessantly. If Hakim Jeffries is too conservative for her, if she wants to primary him, we are all effed. Different districts need different representatives. We can’t have these ideological purity tests over who’s left or progressive enough. She’s promoting this holier than though attitude about disrupting the Democratic Party - can’t we disrupt the Donald first?

You understand nothing. Fellow Democrat. The tax rate on highest earners - on a portion of earnings - was 90% in Eisenhower’s day, and around 70% during JFK’s tenure. She’s talking about looking at Reaganomics critically,as is Warren. As much or more to the point, the criticisms of her have been actual misogyny in action - creepy pics of her taken to try and prove she lied about financial anxiety based on her outfits, the shithead argument advanced here that she was somehow obligated to debate overrated dunce Ben Shapiro, and now all this deeply dumb fogey panic about how she’s the next coming of Stalin with the cult of personality bullshit. She voted for Pelosi and seems eager to learn. Let it breathe.

You use this black and white rhetoric at your peril. We can both believe Ben Shapiro is a dick who wet dreams about her AND think she’s a show pony when we need workhorses. Some of the criticism around her is accurate. We’re not going back to a 70% rate- have you seen the crazy new tax cuts?

We are going to have workhorses. Stop prattling on about AOC and you’ll have an easier time noticing them.

You lost me at prattle and “you understand nothing.” Were you trying to make a point?

Nope -def a misogynist Bernie bro.

Your powers of persuasion and perception seem pretty weak. I am a female Clinton supporter,

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many Democrats do not like her. We think she’s smart, a great dancer, charming, even, but she doesn’t understand basics concepts about how government works, she’s got pie-in-the sky ideas like a 70% tax bracket, she inflates her self almost like Eva Peron or Margaret Thatcher - start working, learn, then talk incessantly. If Hakim Jeffries is too conservative for her, if she wants to primary him, we are all effed. Different districts need different representatives. We can’t have these ideological purity tests over who’s left or progressive enough. She’s promoting this holier than though attitude about disrupting the Democratic Party - can’t we disrupt the Donald first?

You understand nothing. Fellow Democrat. The tax rate on highest earners - on a portion of earnings - was 90% in Eisenhower’s day, and around 70% during JFK’s tenure. She’s talking about looking at Reaganomics critically,as is Warren. As much or more to the point, the criticisms of her have been actual misogyny in action - creepy pics of her taken to try and prove she lied about financial anxiety based on her outfits, the shithead argument advanced here that she was somehow obligated to debate overrated dunce Ben Shapiro, and now all this deeply dumb fogey panic about how she’s the next coming of Stalin with the cult of personality bullshit. She voted for Pelosi and seems eager to learn. Let it breathe.

You use this black and white rhetoric at your peril. We can both believe Ben Shapiro is a dick who wet dreams about her AND think she’s a show pony when we need workhorses. Some of the criticism around her is accurate. We’re not going back to a 70% rate- have you seen the crazy new tax cuts?

We are going to have workhorses. Stop prattling on about AOC and you’ll have an easier time noticing them.

You lost me at prattle and “you understand nothing.” Were you trying to make a point?

Nope -def a misogynist Bernie bro.

Your powers of persuasion and perception seem pretty weak. I am a female Clinton supporter,

PP is talking to at least two different posters, and I’m also a female Clinton supporter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many Democrats do not like her. We think she’s smart, a great dancer, charming, even, but she doesn’t understand basics concepts about how government works, she’s got pie-in-the sky ideas like a 70% tax bracket, she inflates her self almost like Eva Peron or Margaret Thatcher - start working, learn, then talk incessantly. If Hakim Jeffries is too conservative for her, if she wants to primary him, we are all effed. Different districts need different representatives. We can’t have these ideological purity tests over who’s left or progressive enough. She’s promoting this holier than though attitude about disrupting the Democratic Party - can’t we disrupt the Donald first?

You understand nothing. Fellow Democrat. The tax rate on highest earners - on a portion of earnings - was 90% in Eisenhower’s day, and around 70% during JFK’s tenure. She’s talking about looking at Reaganomics critically,as is Warren. As much or more to the point, the criticisms of her have been actual misogyny in action - creepy pics of her taken to try and prove she lied about financial anxiety based on her outfits, the shithead argument advanced here that she was somehow obligated to debate overrated dunce Ben Shapiro, and now all this deeply dumb fogey panic about how she’s the next coming of Stalin with the cult of personality bullshit. She voted for Pelosi and seems eager to learn. Let it breathe.

You use this black and white rhetoric at your peril. We can both believe Ben Shapiro is a dick who wet dreams about her AND think she’s a show pony when we need workhorses. Some of the criticism around her is accurate. We’re not going back to a 70% rate- have you seen the crazy new tax cuts?

We are going to have workhorses. Stop prattling on about AOC and you’ll have an easier time noticing them.

You lost me at prattle and “you understand nothing.” Were you trying to make a point?

Nope -def a misogynist Bernie bro.

Your powers of persuasion and perception seem pretty weak. I am a female Clinton supporter,

PP is talking to at least two different posters, and I’m also a female Clinton supporter.

And a 3rd. I did prefer Bernie, but happily voted for Clinton in the general. WAY better than the alternative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many Democrats do not like her. We think she’s smart, a great dancer, charming, even, but she doesn’t understand basics concepts about how government works, she’s got pie-in-the sky ideas like a 70% tax bracket, she inflates her self almost like Eva Peron or Margaret Thatcher - start working, learn, then talk incessantly. If Hakim Jeffries is too conservative for her, if she wants to primary him, we are all effed. Different districts need different representatives. We can’t have these ideological purity tests over who’s left or progressive enough. She’s promoting this holier than though attitude about disrupting the Democratic Party - can’t we disrupt the Donald first?

You understand nothing. Fellow Democrat. The tax rate on highest earners - on a portion of earnings - was 90% in Eisenhower’s day, and around 70% during JFK’s tenure. She’s talking about looking at Reaganomics critically,as is Warren. As much or more to the point, the criticisms of her have been actual misogyny in action - creepy pics of her taken to try and prove she lied about financial anxiety based on her outfits, the shithead argument advanced here that she was somehow obligated to debate overrated dunce Ben Shapiro, and now all this deeply dumb fogey panic about how she’s the next coming of Stalin with the cult of personality bullshit. She voted for Pelosi and seems eager to learn. Let it breathe.

You use this black and white rhetoric at your peril. We can both believe Ben Shapiro is a dick who wet dreams about her AND think she’s a show pony when we need workhorses. Some of the criticism around her is accurate. We’re not going back to a 70% rate- have you seen the crazy new tax cuts?

We are going to have workhorses. Stop prattling on about AOC and you’ll have an easier time noticing them.

You lost me at prattle and “you understand nothing.” Were you trying to make a point?

Nope -def a misogynist Bernie bro.

Your powers of persuasion and perception seem pretty weak. I am a female Clinton supporter,

PP is talking to at least two different posters, and I’m also a female Clinton supporter.

And a 3rd. I did prefer Bernie, but happily voted for Clinton in the general. WAY better than the alternative.

4th HRC female voter. Time for certain PPs to stop this crybaby Bernie Bro whining.

[Anonymous]

The very fact that we are referring to her as AOS, means she is fomenting a cult of personality.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:The very fact that we are referring to her as AOS, means she is fomenting a cult of personality.

We actually refer to her as AOC. We are also members of the FDR, LBJ, MBS, and newly formed AMLO cults.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The very fact that we are referring to her as AOS, means she is fomenting a cult of personality.

We actually refer to her as AOC. We are also members of the FDR, LBJ, MBS, and newly formed AMLO cults.

MBS is a cult of personality- very apt comparison!

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The very fact that we are referring to her as AOS, means she is fomenting a cult of personality.

We actually refer to her as AOC. We are also members of the FDR, LBJ, MBS, and newly formed AMLO cults.

MBS is a cult of personality- very apt comparison!

Maybe in Saudi Arabia, but not among the DCUM posters who call that.