It really wouldn't. Annandale has capacity, so no need to drag Woodson or Falls Church into this. Of course, moving part of Lee to West Springfield probably would necessitate moving part of WS to Lake Braddock, and perhaps part of LB elsewhere (South County or Robinson). Life would go on. You are so transparent about the purported county-wide chain effect this would trigger. Heck, the last time a school was closed (regular Jefferson) the entire student body moved to a single high school (Annandale). By your reckoning, the Jefferson kids would have had to move to each of Annandale, Stuart, Lee and Edison, and triggering further redistrictings to Falls Church, Woodson, Fort Hunt (now West Potomac), etc. A number of schools in eastern Fairfax have extra capacity. Western Fairfax is a different story. |
In the other thread gatehouse poster wrote the issue is the older esol students who are required to take SOL starting this year. It's expected they won't do well and likely of losing school accreditation. 1. I wondering if Older esol students can be moved to an alternative school, Is this not the easiest solution? 2. Instead of the HB lawnwood structures (no neighborhood students), Go with the Bailey and hunting magnet program structures (neighborhood and lottery students) but strink the boundary for Lee (draw a new boundary with consideration for spreading out the apartments and condos) and remove IB from other local HS. So less Lee in boundary students but good mix (equity) which open the school to accept lottery students, and less redistricting (reduce overcrowding at other HS). Plus Lee in boundary families can pupil place out for AP. |
| I don’t see a lot of excess capacity in the eastern HS. Annandale has over 2,100 students. The only reason they had 2,500 before was because of the modular - and having 2,500 was deemed “too much” and was the reason for the re-drawing of boundaries. Edison is closed to transfers because it is at capacity. Stuart is at/over capacity. It looks like there may be a little space at Hayfield. But there are no other options for absorbing Lee students. It would have to be a re-drawing of boundaries for many schools. Quite honestly, I think they should re-draw every boundary county-wide before they build any more schools. |
Most of the eight schools being discussed in the proposal are projected to be under-enrolled and keep in mind that the goal here is to make more use of the projected excess capacity at Lee with a New IB magnet. You are analyzing this as if kids would only be redistricted out of Lee without considering the students who would be enrolling there. |
How many kids from all of those high schools, including Lee, graduate with the IB diploma? I thought it is very few of them and not nearly enough to fill a high school. |
| Lee will probably not start out as a magnet, but can we all agree that there are too many IB schools in that area? Can at least this change happen? |
Way too many. There’s no reason for Lee and Edison and Annandale to all have IB. Lee and Edison are on the same road! You could take a nice jog between the two. I still think that they could keep Lee as both a neighborhood school and an IB magnet. Send the Saratoga kids to either Hayfield or South County, and one of the elementary schools on the western part of the Lee boundary to WS. The IB magnet wouldn’t be as big as they maybe want it to be but there’d still be plenty of capacity. |
| As existing AP schools close to transfers, it makes perfect sense some of the under-enrolled IB programs would be shut down. Parents no longer have the pupil placement option for AP. The question is whether trying to make Lee an IB magnet at the same time is feasible. |
|
Agree there are too many IB in the Eastern Fairfax. I would like to write to the school board. What's the best way to get my support for one IB in this area heard?
I'm in Tamara Kaufax district, no children in high school yet, would like to send them to a IB program (if they are interested), the magnet program does not need to be at Lee. Also should I reach out to the SB member at large? What about McKay? Superintendent? Others? What organizations may also support the one IB idea? Springfield Civil Association? Thanks |
just go on to fcps.edu and you will see a link for School Board. And that will bring you to a page where you can find your rep and email all the reps if you like. It's pretty automated. |
I completely agree with this. The whole show of public input is just that...a show. When a decision is made, it's made. And they aren't going to broadcast the sausage being made. I definitely see something dramatic like this happening under the cover of other decisions like opening a new West county high school. |
This is true of every boundary "discussion" in the county. Certainly, it is not limited to South County. In fact, it is not even limited to boundary decisions. See the name change at Stuart. That was all pre-arranged from the very beginning. Unfortunately, the two SB members who started the whole thing forgot that FCPS already had a "Marshall" High School. From the time they began the discussion of getting rid of "Stuart" they had decided that it would be "Thurgood Marshall." If other SB members had not realized that two Marshall Highs would not be wise, it would have happened. Some even thought they could pull it off--that it didn't matter. |
| No point in writing to the school board? |
DP. I thought it would be fine to have a Marshall and a Thurgood Marshall. There's South County and South Lakes, West Potomac and West Springfield and Westfield. Not that confusing. But I know, you don't like it. |
Sure, write to the school board. |