Did you believe Amanda Knox was guilty?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whose s*it was in the toilet? Ok another note -is Amanda really HIV+ Or was that some kind of scare tactic?

Rudy Guede's.

She was told that she tested positive for HIV so that she would produce a list of every person she had had sex with. From what I understand they were hoping to find Rudy Guede on that list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If she is not guilty:

Why was Sollecito's DNA on Meredith's bra straight?

Why was Amanda and Meredith's DNA on a knife at Sollecito's home?

The DNA of several people was found on the bra clasp after it had been kicked around a dirty floor, handled with dirty gloves, tossed in a random box and then exposed to who knows what in a poorly run lab. The prosecution conveniently didn't mention the other DNA, only Sollecito's. If Sollecito had actually touched the clasp there would be much more f his DNA there than was found.

Amanda's DNA was on the handle of that knife because she had used it while cooking.

Meredith's DNA was not on the blade in any amount that is scientifically relevant. The machine that the sample was tested on found nothing relevant. The controls were overridden and eventually a ridiculously tiny scrap of DNA was found- so tiny that any reputable forensic scientist would know that it was easily a bit of contamination from all the other Kercher material being tested in the lab at that time. And it wasn't blood, btw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the violent nature of the crime in the apartment where I was residing would have had me more upset than the death of a roommate I wasn't close to.

You have no idea how you might react in an upsetting circumstance. I think she went a little numb, honestly. The footage I've seen of her at the crime scene while to police were inside her apartment, she looked dazed.

I think that she was a combination of sad, numb, terrified and outraged. All normal emotions that manifested at different times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whose s*it was in the toilet? Ok another note -is Amanda really HIV+ Or was that some kind of scare tactic?

It was Rudy Guede's feces. The HIV+ status was a scare tactic used by the police/prosecutor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she is not guilty:

Why was Sollecito's DNA on Meredith's bra straight?

Why was Amanda and Meredith's DNA on a knife at Sollecito's home?

The DNA of several people was found on the bra clasp after it had been kicked around a dirty floor, handled with dirty gloves, tossed in a random box and then exposed to who knows what in a poorly run lab. The prosecution conveniently didn't mention the other DNA, only Sollecito's. If Sollecito had actually touched the clasp there would be much more f his DNA there than was found.

Amanda's DNA was on the handle of that knife because she had used it while cooking.

Meredith's DNA was not on the blade in any amount that is scientifically relevant. The machine that the sample was tested on found nothing relevant. The controls were overridden and eventually a ridiculously tiny scrap of DNA was found- so tiny that any reputable forensic scientist would know that it was easily a bit of contamination from all the other Kercher material being tested in the lab at that time. And it wasn't blood, btw.

So in every other case, DNA is the be all end all. But in this case, it's fake.

[Anonymous]

She deserved jail, after doing splits and cartwheels at the police station while being questioned.

The experience seemed to straighten her out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she is not guilty:

Why was Sollecito's DNA on Meredith's bra straight?

Why was Amanda and Meredith's DNA on a knife at Sollecito's home?

The DNA of several people was found on the bra clasp after it had been kicked around a dirty floor, handled with dirty gloves, tossed in a random box and then exposed to who knows what in a poorly run lab. The prosecution conveniently didn't mention the other DNA, only Sollecito's. If Sollecito had actually touched the clasp there would be much more f his DNA there than was found.

Amanda's DNA was on the handle of that knife because she had used it while cooking.

Meredith's DNA was not on the blade in any amount that is scientifically relevant. The machine that the sample was tested on found nothing relevant. The controls were overridden and eventually a ridiculously tiny scrap of DNA was found- so tiny that any reputable forensic scientist would know that it was easily a bit of contamination from all the other Kercher material being tested in the lab at that time. And it wasn't blood, btw.

So in every other case, DNA is the be all end all. But in this case, it's fake.

Not fake. Falsified.

[Anonymous]

Having Amanda's dna in the apartment is not that big of a deal because she lives there and is shedding cells all the time? It would be a surprise if her dna wasn't there.The meredith dna on that knife was too small and is considered unreliable because it was "detected" by amplifying it thousands of times so it was probably a lab contaminant. If you see the pictures of the bloody room, if Amanda were really in that room during the crime, she would have left a foot/hand print on something if she was involved. It's impossible to clean up only her prints and leave Rudy's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did she act weird?
I don't know. If someone had been murdered that I had only known a couple weeks, I wouldn't be super upset. I'd be upset, but I doubt I'd cry about it.

Wow.

Wow what? You get worked over people you barely know? I had a co worker pass really unexpectedly a few years ago. Some people really went over the deep end about it. These were people with I was sad for her and her family. She was robbed of a lot of life and it really made me take stock. I didn't get all weepy about it. It wasn't about me, and I didn't make it about me.
My guess is that she didn't really wrap her brain around the violent nature of what happened. Not sure I would have either.

Meredith was brutally murdered. And she wasn't a random stranger whose death was reported on the news. This was her roommate and the murder occurred in her home. Most normal people would be very upset over that. You don't need to be BFF with someone to find that scenario horrifying and for it to be very upsetting.

So yea, Wow. Something is definitely off with you that you wouldn't view that as super upsetting. But your responses speak volumes.

Sounds like you would make a great prosecutor in Italy. Maybe you shouldn't judge people based on their reactions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Having Amanda's dna in the apartment is not that big of a deal because she lives there and is shedding cells all the time? It would be a surprise if her dna wasn't there.The meredith dna on that knife was too small and is considered unreliable because it was "detected" by amplifying it thousands of times so it was probably a lab contaminant. If you see the pictures of the bloody room, if Amanda were really in that room during the crime, she would have left a foot/hand print on something if she was involved. It's impossible to clean up only her prints and leave Rudy's.

No shit Sherlock.
The knife was in Sollecito's apartment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Having Amanda's dna in the apartment is not that big of a deal because she lives there and is shedding cells all the time? It would be a surprise if her dna wasn't there.The meredith dna on that knife was too small and is considered unreliable because it was "detected" by amplifying it thousands of times so it was probably a lab contaminant. If you see the pictures of the bloody room, if Amanda were really in that room during the crime, she would have left a foot/hand print on something if she was involved. It's impossible to clean up only her prints and leave Rudy's.

No shit Sherlock.
The knife was in Sollecito's apartment.

What's your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did she act weird?
I don't know. If someone had been murdered that I had only known a couple weeks, I wouldn't be super upset. I'd be upset, but I doubt I'd cry about it.

Wow.

Wow what? You get worked over people you barely know? I had a co worker pass really unexpectedly a few years ago. Some people really went over the deep end about it. These were people with I was sad for her and her family. She was robbed of a lot of life and it really made me take stock. I didn't get all weepy about it. It wasn't about me, and I didn't make it about me.
My guess is that she didn't really wrap her brain around the violent nature of what happened. Not sure I would have either.

Meredith was brutally murdered. And she wasn't a random stranger whose death was reported on the news. This was her roommate and the murder occurred in her home. Most normal people would be very upset over that. You don't need to be BFF with someone to find that scenario horrifying and for it to be very upsetting.

So yea, Wow. Something is definitely off with you that you wouldn't view that as super upsetting. But your responses speak volumes.

Sounds like you would make a great prosecutor in Italy. Maybe you shouldn't judge people based on their reactions.

You're being judged based on the non-reaction you said you would have. Sorry that you're so callous about human life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Having Amanda's dna in the apartment is not that big of a deal because she lives there and is shedding cells all the time? It would be a surprise if her dna wasn't there.The meredith dna on that knife was too small and is considered unreliable because it was "detected" by amplifying it thousands of times so it was probably a lab contaminant. If you see the pictures of the bloody room, if Amanda were really in that room during the crime, she would have left a foot/hand print on something if she was involved. It's impossible to clean up only her prints and leave Rudy's.

No shit Sherlock.
The knife was in Sollecito's apartment.

What's your point?

What is your point saying that Amanda's Dna would be in the apartment?
Nobody said it shouldn't be, it's a non issue.

[Anonymous]

Just watched the documentary. The prosecuter is so biased and idiotic. He actually says he got his training from reading Sherlock Holmes. He should be ashamed. It was like a fun game to him. And yeah, Amanda acted in a strange way, but that doesn't make her a murderer. Add to that the total botching of the processing of DNA evidence and I am convinced they were on a witch hunt. All I can think now is about meredith's poor family who have no idea what really happened.

[Anonymous]

Why did Amanda wear that crazy "all you need is love " Tshirt? During trial.

She is nuts,