Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
They really weren’t talking about her. You are so rude and dishonest. |
Everyone is so devastated to lose marrying good king Harry. He’s so good looking and incredibly talented, and excellent at managing relationships. His accent is class, right? Formal education and teeth that aren’t estranged from each other are overrated, and I also tend to like dashing darling men who wore Nazi regalia to parties and then blamed others for it. I’m so mad I can’t have him. I weep. I seethe. I yearn for the gentle touch of the Brillo-haired big dummy. Thank you for seeing me, sister. |
Ok, now you have an OB, a stranger off the street, and a bone surgeon doing bone surgery. If the other two can stay out of the bone surgeon’s way, maybe the project has a chance. |
Yes! Meghan was intimately responsible for the success of Suits and can write and cast this. It’ll be bigger than Bridgerton and Squid Games! |
If Shonda was the director or producer of this polo series, I'd watch it. |
This. |
LOL. So it really got under your skin that Harry put the blame for that Nazi outfit where it belongs, on Will and Kate, and he brought receipts. Surprised you even read Spare, tbh. I'll wait for the reviews on the polo drama. I don't watch complete trash, no matter who the showrunners are or who stars in it. If the reviews are good and it's popular enough to hit Netflix's top 10 or their recommendations, then I might watch an episode or two and then decide. From this thread, you'd think Harry and Meghan are cruelly forcing everyone to watch all ~10 episodes, lol. |
No matter who or where he got the idea, he’s the idiot who wore the costume. I don’t know if it reflects more poorly on him that he’s too stupid to know a bad idea when someone gave it to him or if he’s the one who thought of it. |
That Nazi costume was a terrible idea. But it's also hard to understand where your hate for them is coming from. Harboring so much hate is bad for you. |
DP. For the life of me, I can't figure out why he dredged all that up in Spare. It was an incredibly unflattering incident, but he was also 20 at the time, and he took accountability and apologized. He seemed genuinely remorseful. I'm not sure how or why that anecdote made it into the book. |
Why are you being so weird. I don't think it will be bigger than Bridgerton or Squid Games. I don't actually care of it's "big" or not. I just like the idea and hope they make something good that I would actually watch. And no, I didn't say Meghan was "intimately responsible" for the success of Suits (which was only moderately successful itself -- long running but as a basic cable show). I said she has a lot of connections with people who know how to make a watchable, somewhat sexy, dramatic show. Writers, directors, show runners, etc. Meghan didn't produce Suits but obviously you get to know people and learn something about how shows like that come together when you star on one for 8 years. The problem with this conversation is that you think it's a referendum on whether Meghan is a good person or not and I don't even care about that one way or another. Some of us are just having a conversation about whether this sounds like a good show or not, or what we'd hope to see in the show, or expressing optimism that it could be good. I don't actually care about Meghan one way or another. To quote Mariah: "I don't know her." |
He brought it up because that book was about how he felt sacrificed by his family to the press for decades, and that was an example of where he felt the family allowed him to take the blame for something that actually implicated his brother as well, but as "the spare" it was his job to absorb the criticism for it and protect "the heir." That's the entire thesis of the book. Of course he's going to discuss one of the single most embarrassing incidents of his life within that context. |
At the end of the day, he wore the costume. He took accountability and apologized and it seemed like he meant it. I stand by my comment. |
Right. He didn't bring it up in spare because he felt he needed to take accountability again. He brought it up as part of a different story, about how he felt his family used him as cannon fodder for the tabloids to protect his brother for his entire life. And bringing it up was fine, since it did not in fact lead to people rehashing the incident. |
Honestly I don't think that was from someone who likes Meghan or thinks she's a good person. It seems like lame sarcasm, in the same way a lot of the responses to even slightly pro-Meghan posts are met with lame ad hominems or lame deflections. I don't know if I've seen anything about Meghan being a wonderful person. But I've seen plenty of comments that want to turn this thread into how she's a terrible person. Agree, the original convo was about whether this would be fun to watch--or not. And about how Netflix hasn't cut ties with M&H, despite what all the reporting a week ago from Bowers and his ilk would have had us believe. None of us knows Meghan (or Harry, who's actually the polo guru), so making this about all Meghan's personality is just weird. |