Generational wealth. What's behind the obsession?

Anonymous
You don’t need to worry about generational wealth because people take care of it with procreation. My great grandfather made a ton of money and nobody squandered much of it, but for 1/70th of a fortune to be a lot, it has to have started out really enormous.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV.


I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon.

Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate.

BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere.





Meh, my DH and his siblings have a trust fund and all of them work. One runs a farm and is at the farmers market each weekend and works her ass off, one works as ski patrol in winter and MTB patrol in summer, and my DH works in education but i do not want to get too specific here. The difference is the all do "work" they love. The principal of the trust is not even touched, there are rules and it is a whole process to get any extra money than the alloted and nobody has even tried it. The truest basucally gows on its own and is the money maker.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV.


I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon.

Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate.

BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere.





Meh, my DH and his siblings have a trust fund and all of them work. One runs a farm and is at the farmers market each weekend and works her ass off, one works as ski patrol in winter and MTB patrol in summer, and my DH works in education but i do not want to get too specific here. The difference is the all do "work" they love. The principal of the trust is not even touched, there are rules and it is a whole process to get any extra money than the alloted and nobody has even tried it. The truest basucally gows on its own and is the money maker.


Not getting your point. PP said they don’t care if their kids just travel and enjoy life.

Also, you admit that the principal of the trust can be touched…just that your DH and siblings haven’t. It just takes a couple of dumbf**ks to go after the principal (and they will get it…the trustee has little incentive to fight it) and blow it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV.


I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon.

Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate.

BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere.





And you know what? At least they had fun. You live once. They weren’t going to be all star lawyers if they’re that foolish so at least they pursued travel and leisure.


You are correct…but that’s not generational wealth then.
Anonymous
“fly first class or your kids will”

And yes to all the PP’s, if the kids never get a job and no outside income ever comes in, you can blow through a lot of money very fast.

My parents are very frugal and also fairly wealthy. They pay for all grandkids private schools but live modestly. I wish they would spend more on their lives but they won’t. Don’t get me wrong—they travel to Europe, have 2 homes, but they could definitely spend more. I guess it’s good for the generations. I’ll fly first class.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV.


I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon.

Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate.

BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere.





Meh, my DH and his siblings have a trust fund and all of them work. One runs a farm and is at the farmers market each weekend and works her ass off, one works as ski patrol in winter and MTB patrol in summer, and my DH works in education but i do not want to get too specific here. The difference is the all do "work" they love. The principal of the trust is not even touched, there are rules and it is a whole process to get any extra money than the alloted and nobody has even tried it. The truest basucally gows on its own and is the money maker.


Not getting your point. PP said they don’t care if their kids just travel and enjoy life.

Also, you admit that the principal of the trust can be touched…just that your DH and siblings haven’t. It just takes a couple of dumbf**ks to go after the principal (and they will get it…the trustee has little incentive to fight it) and blow it.


I suppose? but it is not easy. Has to be approved and theres narrow list of qualifiers. Something pretty devastating would have to happen thst the normal generous disbursements could not cover.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV.


I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon.

Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate.

BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere.





Meh, my DH and his siblings have a trust fund and all of them work. One runs a farm and is at the farmers market each weekend and works her ass off, one works as ski patrol in winter and MTB patrol in summer, and my DH works in education but i do not want to get too specific here. The difference is the all do "work" they love. The principal of the trust is not even touched, there are rules and it is a whole process to get any extra money than the alloted and nobody has even tried it. The truest basucally gows on its own and is the money maker.


Not getting your point. PP said they don’t care if their kids just travel and enjoy life.

Also, you admit that the principal of the trust can be touched…just that your DH and siblings haven’t. It just takes a couple of dumbf**ks to go after the principal (and they will get it…the trustee has little incentive to fight it) and blow it.


I suppose? but it is not easy. Has to be approved and theres narrow list of qualifiers. Something pretty devastating would have to happen thst the normal generous disbursements could not cover.


Often times they may allow for capital to start a business and other “good” reasons that can easily be abused.

The biggest issue is the trustee doesn’t want to be sued…if the request passes muster, they aren’t going to decline because they think it’s a bad idea.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV.


I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon.

Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate.

BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere.



That was poor planning on the grandfathers part and poor advice from whoever set up the trusts. The trusts should have had professional trustees with that amount of money involved. I doubt there was any thinking of preserving money for future generation.

If they had been generational trusts, the money would have been more tightly controlled. It would be used for housing, education, household needs, medical, vacations etc. The trustee would ask the beneficiaries to fill out a form listing all of the their expenses and the trustee would send a monthly payment. If a car was needed, new housing, the trustee would wire the money directly to the dealership or real estate agent.

That’s how you preserve money and leave incentive for them to work if they want some kind of lavish lifestyle.
Anonymous
I don’t understand OPs question. If you work and live below your means, you accumulate wealth and pass it on. This is just simple math and not an obsession. Teach good hardworking values to your kids.
Everyone should work, even if part-time. Gives you a sense of purpose, meaning, social outlet and keeps the mind sharp.

I no longer need to work for money even though I still have 2 kids who haven’t started college yet and I plan to pay for it. But I love my job in healthcare and love helping others. I would be depressed if I didn’t work.

3 generations from now, I have no idea if they’ll blow the money but that doesn’t mean I should blow it now.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:“fly first class or your kids will”

And yes to all the PP’s, if the kids never get a job and no outside income ever comes in, you can blow through a lot of money very fast.

My parents are very frugal and also fairly wealthy. They pay for all grandkids private schools but live modestly. I wish they would spend more on their lives but they won’t. Don’t get me wrong—they travel to Europe, have 2 homes, but they could definitely spend more. I guess it’s good for the generations. I’ll fly first class.


Why are your parents paying for your kids private school? Don't you guys have income? Or just put them in public school.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV.


I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon.

Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate.

BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere.



That was poor planning on the grandfathers part and poor advice from whoever set up the trusts. The trusts should have had professional trustees with that amount of money involved. I doubt there was any thinking of preserving money for future generation.

If they had been generational trusts, the money would have been more tightly controlled. It would be used for housing, education, household needs, medical, vacations etc. The trustee would ask the beneficiaries to fill out a form listing all of the their expenses and the trustee would send a monthly payment. If a car was needed, new housing, the trustee would wire the money directly to the dealership or real estate agent.

That’s how you preserve money and leave incentive for them to work if they want some kind of lavish lifestyle.


Not sure how many times it needs to be said, but often times these trusts allow for significant capital for a business as one example. That sounds like a “good” use of funds, but can be easily abused.

A professional trustee isn’t going to be able to deny the money because it’s a bad business idea…they only do what the trust guidelines indicate.

The problem is that the kids and grandkids weren’t raised with a strong work ethic. A motivated heir who really wants the principal will get their hands on it one way or another.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:“fly first class or your kids will”

And yes to all the PP’s, if the kids never get a job and no outside income ever comes in, you can blow through a lot of money very fast.

My parents are very frugal and also fairly wealthy. They pay for all grandkids private schools but live modestly. I wish they would spend more on their lives but they won’t. Don’t get me wrong—they travel to Europe, have 2 homes, but they could definitely spend more. I guess it’s good for the generations. I’ll fly first class.


Why are your parents paying for your kids private school? Don't you guys have income? Or just put them in public school.


My parents pay for private school because it’s generational wealth and a way to pass down money without tax implications. We have incomes.
Anonymous
not in this position myself by goal is for each generation to be in a better spot financially than the one before.

I've seen that passing down enough such that later generations don't have to work has led to a lot of issues.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV.


I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon.

Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate.

BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere.



That was poor planning on the grandfathers part and poor advice from whoever set up the trusts. The trusts should have had professional trustees with that amount of money involved. I doubt there was any thinking of preserving money for future generation.

If they had been generational trusts, the money would have been more tightly controlled. It would be used for housing, education, household needs, medical, vacations etc. The trustee would ask the beneficiaries to fill out a form listing all of the their expenses and the trustee would send a monthly payment. If a car was needed, new housing, the trustee would wire the money directly to the dealership or real estate agent.

That’s how you preserve money and leave incentive for them to work if they want some kind of lavish lifestyle.


Not sure how many times it needs to be said, but often times these trusts allow for significant capital for a business as one example. That sounds like a “good” use of funds, but can be easily abused.

A professional trustee isn’t going to be able to deny the money because it’s a bad business idea…they only do what the trust guidelines indicate.

The problem is that the kids and grandkids weren’t raised with a strong work ethic. A motivated heir who really wants the principal will get their hands on it one way or another.



The trustee will abide by the terms that the grantor set. The grantor could instruct no distributions for opening a business. There can be four grandchildren with four different needs. Instructions to the trustee can be tailored to each individual’s needs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand OPs question. If you work and live below your means, you accumulate wealth and pass it on. This is just simple math and not an obsession. Teach good hardworking values to your kids.
Everyone should work, even if part-time. Gives you a sense of purpose, meaning, social outlet and keeps the mind sharp.

I no longer need to work for money even though I still have 2 kids who haven’t started college yet and I plan to pay for it. But I love my job in healthcare and love helping others. I would be depressed if I didn’t work.

3 generations from now, I have no idea if they’ll blow the money but that doesn’t mean I should blow it now.


Where exactly do you find these satisfying part time jobs? Most part time work is in service sector where you are working for close to minimum wage and under the foot of of the supervisors and customers in your face. Not always pleasant or keeping your mind sharp. Driving uber or doing uber eats is a bit more pleasant if you like driving around and going places. The rest if the jobs you make for yourself, and to get there, you usually have to invest a lot of years of hard full time work. To grow some private practice, to establish yourself as a consultant, start a business where you don't have to show up every day, etc. Most of it is hobby stuff anyway. Reality of working for vast majority of people is grind.
post reply Forum Index » Money and Finances
Message Quick Reply
Go to: