As long as liberals stop having kids the future of the country should be in great shape |
I’m an elder millennial and feel like I just missed the cutoff for learning how badly it sucks to have kids The constant noise, expense and loss of freedom. Women used to have kids because they had no other option. |
Yes we can end up just as great as the other countries where women have no rights. You know, the countries you like to bomb. |
The birth rates in red states are still under replacement rate so don’t get your hopes up too much. |
Imagine how tiresome she in in real life. |
Have only seen her post a couple times but fwiw it would be very easy for most of DCUM to buy a castle in France. They are not that expensive...but they are a pita! |
I don't agree with this framing. My parents, and my spouse's parents, were all public teachers - the textbook definition of middle class. They did all of the bolded. And while not entirely financing their grandkids' educations, they have made not insubstantial contributions to their 529 accounts, to the extent they are able. No one in their right mind would say that they have generational wealth. Paying for your kids' college is just expected. When I think of generational wealth, I think trust funds. Not necessarily at a "never have to work again and become a profligate dipsh!t like Paris Hilton" level, but something that kicks off income, and can be tapped for large expenses (tuition, substantial downpayment, etc.) without cleaning it out. I don't have a particular value in mind, it's more of an attitude. |
|
I have no motivation to leave my kid money. I don’t even think that expectation is good for young adults.
Maybe it is because my family of origin was blue collar, but I think she is lucky she has no college debt and won’t have to worry about my support (or LTC in retirement). (Don’t get me wrong, as an only child she probably will inherit some $, but that was not one of my financial goals.) |
That's right. That's the reason it's referred to as generational. The wealth is so substantial that at least one future generation will be wealthy without needing to lift a finger. |
|
Because I want to know that my kids and grandkids are safe and cared for - as much as I can anyway, even after I'm gone. People have left bequests to their children since time immemorial. It's a normal thing to do. What else am I going to do with my accumulated assets?
Sure people can and do give to charity but providing for your descendants is another normal thing to do. |
| I’d rather have my children enjoy generational wealth than slave away at Google, Morgan Stanley, a federal agency, or other soul crushing office work. If they pursue the arts, great. If they pursue being a teacher or something low paying, great. If they want to just work out and travel and live well with their own families, great. Any of it is better than the toil and striving and stress you see on this forum and in the DMV. |
I have no idea how much wealth you have, but have in laws on my spouse's side where the grandparents left $50MM to a son and two grandchildren...and it's all gone now (happened over 20 years). The all "traveled and lived well"...literally. None of the three ever held a real job...just a series of lifestyle businesses that ate capital and went nowhere, in addition to traveling a ton, living in resort towns and spending without abandon. Look...if the kids hadn't been such dumbf**ks of course they could have lived well off just the dividends, but the grandparents who made the money kind of had the same attitude as you and didn't instill any kind of stewardship over the estate. BTW, the money was all in generational trusts...if the ones who benefit from the trusts want to get at the principal, they can. In this case, it was all their stupid business ideas. The trustee was not going to risk getting sued for not releasing the principal even though they probably thought the ideas were not going anywhere. |
And you know what? At least they had fun. You live once. They weren’t going to be all star lawyers if they’re that foolish so at least they pursued travel and leisure. |
|
Pretty simple really in the 1960s 61 percent of people were considered middle class (https://theworld.org/stories/2015/12/11/american-middle-class-shrinking ) but the middle class is shrinking. In part because the upper middle class and above are growing. In a generation the numbers will continue to shift and income and wealth inequality will continue grow. Foresee a 30-70 split between the haves and have nots. Want my kids and grand kids to be in that 30%. Fortunately have the means to set my kids on the right path.
That is why generational wealth will become even more relevant going forward. |
I'm not obsessed, but there is only SO MUCH money I can spend. As we have gotten older our expenses are less and less. I do not get joy from buying things. At 48 I have the furntiure I need, I only gain and lose the same 10lbs so my clothes fit, we only travel with 3 often just 2 of us, and we are sitting at a very low interest rate and payment for a house that is now probably too big for us. I'm not going to just spend money becuase we have it. We just have a bunch of money left over each month and continue to dump into the market and occasionally buy a rental property when the right deal pops up. I'm not looking to leave my kids money, I'm looking to give it to them when they need it most when they are starting their own adult lives. |