More a product of the individual, not the college they attended. |
If you are going to make the assertion, then you need to separate in-state versus OOS applicants/matriculants. |
There is no purpose in separating in-state versus out-of-state applicants. Once they are enrolled, the freshman are all the same. I get that some elitist contend that OOS students are somehow superior to in-state students, but Michigan doesn't confer an OOS Michigan degree or an in-state Michigan degree. |
And somehow account for the fact that UM educated about 8000 more students. |
| The good news is that because Michigan has on balance relatively few SAT high scorers, applying ED with an SAT around 1450 should be an automatic admit. We'll have to wait and see how many students apply ED, but it should be a pretty big number. This will also help Michigan's yield rate get above that magic 50% number. |
Plus add in ACT scores too. |
No such thing as autoadmit for score level. That is not how admission works, not even close. |
Again, in-state and OOS are totally different pools. |
This person is delusional. I know kids higher SATs than that and good GPAs that were rejected at UM, but got in places like UVA. There is no autoadmit and, despite the nonsense above, there are many, many high SAT scoring students at UM. The poster wants to put down the school and looks pathetic. |
They do not have few high scorers. They also had 115K applications. That's a lot of scores. Someone is trying to trick people. |
Ha! DC with 1580 SAT was not an auto-admit during EA rounds. |
My TO DC was "an auto-admit" (OOS) in EA last cycle. |
Do you know the population at Yorktown? This is totally on point with the school demographics. |
It’s possible 70 students applied either EA OR ED. But it is not possible 70 applied ED from Yorktown. Not possible given last year’s numbers with a smaller class for 2026. |
PP, I was referring to the comment about the high cost of OOS tuition. I don't think most of Yorktown is concerned with that. |