Husband voting for Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find that most libs are the least tolerant people on the planet.

Should someone be tolerant of someone else’s intolerance? Why should I be tolerant of someone who wants, either actively or indirectly, to take rights away from people I care about?

I’m sure I’m neighbors or casual friends with people like you, but to be comfortable having a close relationship with someone who is so callous about the rights of others? Nope. Not for me.

- Educated, successful, wealthy woman who is the child of a legal immigrant. I have a lot of friends that would be significantly disadvantaged if the policies promoted by Trump and his ilk would become law.

Would you mind expanding on this a bit?

Nope. You do the work.

Hahahaha. Ok. So you’re using hyperbole and then can’t actually back it up. Not surprising.

DP. To start, every woman in the US. Every person who interacts with the government in some way. Every disenfranchised voter. And the list goes on.

How? How are they impacted? Be specific please.
I interact with the government. How will I be impacted? I’m a woman. How will I be impacted?

Have you read project 2025? Can you read?

How is this relevant? Trump has disavowed Project 2025.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a deal breaker to me and I had a visceral response to his admission. How can someone be so uneducated and unconcerned with the implications of a repeated Trump presidency on his two daughters? I’m frankly so grossed out and feel like this is the end of our marriage.

HAHAHAHAHAAH!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH!!!!!

You're literally a hysterical mess bc DH is voting for Trump? Your world is ending. DO YOU HEAR YOURSELF?

Such drama!!!! You get what you get for all that drama. Good luck!!!

You seem normal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Late to the party here. I'm a left leaning centrist who has generally voted democratic for as long as I can remember. I can say that it would be VERY hard for me to vote for Kamala. Based solely on her actions, she was ranked as the most liberal senator just five years ago. And it looks like she's leaning toward Buttigieg, who is similarly liberal. Such an administration would almost certainly focus its energies on social change and cause a myriad of problems while more pressing existential issues fall to the wayside. I don't want to vote for Trump, but it's like the dems have lost their minds in their echo chamber and are coercing me to do so. Why can't they come up with someone better?

Except here's the problem... in our 2 party system, if you don't vote for Harris, you are helping elect Trump. Hold your nose if you must, but vote for Harris and then work like hell to change the whole system. Taking some "stance" is only going to destroy what little is left of our democracy anyway. I don't understand how people don't understand this

[Anonymous]

Are we talking “just voting for Trump and being normal otherwise” or are we talking “addicted to Rogan, Tucker Carlson, and Tim Pool; can’t form a sentence without referring to how 2020 was robbed; and is obsessive about shopping for guns and ammo?”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the party here. I'm a left leaning centrist who has generally voted democratic for as long as I can remember. I can say that it would be VERY hard for me to vote for Kamala. Based solely on her actions, she was ranked as the most liberal senator just five years ago. And it looks like she's leaning toward Buttigieg, who is similarly liberal. Such an administration would almost certainly focus its energies on social change and cause a myriad of problems while more pressing existential issues fall to the wayside. I don't want to vote for Trump, but it's like the dems have lost their minds in their echo chamber and are coercing me to do so. Why can't they come up with someone better?

Except here's the problem... in our 2 party system, if you don't vote for Harris, you are helping elect Trump. Hold your nose if you must, but vote for Harris and then work like hell to change the whole system. Taking some "stance" is only going to destroy what little is left of our democracy anyway. I don't understand how people don't understand this

+1.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find that most libs are the least tolerant people on the planet.

Should someone be tolerant of someone else’s intolerance? Why should I be tolerant of someone who wants, either actively or indirectly, to take rights away from people I care about?

I’m sure I’m neighbors or casual friends with people like you, but to be comfortable having a close relationship with someone who is so callous about the rights of others? Nope. Not for me.

- Educated, successful, wealthy woman who is the child of a legal immigrant. I have a lot of friends that would be significantly disadvantaged if the policies promoted by Trump and his ilk would become law.

Would you mind expanding on this a bit?

Nope. You do the work.

Hahahaha. Ok. So you’re using hyperbole and then can’t actually back it up. Not surprising.

DP. To start, every woman in the US. Every person who interacts with the government in some way. Every disenfranchised voter. And the list goes on.

How? How are they impacted? Be specific please.
I interact with the government. How will I be impacted? I’m a woman. How will I be impacted?

Have you read project 2025? Can you read?

How is this relevant? Trump has disavowed Project 2025.

No he hasn’t he just had Paul dans fired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find that most libs are the least tolerant people on the planet.

Should someone be tolerant of someone else’s intolerance? Why should I be tolerant of someone who wants, either actively or indirectly, to take rights away from people I care about?

I’m sure I’m neighbors or casual friends with people like you, but to be comfortable having a close relationship with someone who is so callous about the rights of others? Nope. Not for me.

- Educated, successful, wealthy woman who is the child of a legal immigrant. I have a lot of friends that would be significantly disadvantaged if the policies promoted by Trump and his ilk would become law.

Would you mind expanding on this a bit?

Nope. You do the work.

Hahahaha. Ok. So you’re using hyperbole and then can’t actually back it up. Not surprising.

DP. To start, every woman in the US. Every person who interacts with the government in some way. Every disenfranchised voter. And the list goes on.

How? How are they impacted? Be specific please.
I interact with the government. How will I be impacted? I’m a woman. How will I be impacted?

Have you read project 2025? Can you read?

How is this relevant? Trump has disavowed Project 2025.

Did you read his presidential plan for the last election?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the party here. I'm a left leaning centrist who has generally voted democratic for as long as I can remember. I can say that it would be VERY hard for me to vote for Kamala. Based solely on her actions, she was ranked as the most liberal senator just five years ago. And it looks like she's leaning toward Buttigieg, who is similarly liberal. Such an administration would almost certainly focus its energies on social change and cause a myriad of problems while more pressing existential issues fall to the wayside. I don't want to vote for Trump, but it's like the dems have lost their minds in their echo chamber and are coercing me to do so. Why can't they come up with someone better?

Except here's the problem... in our 2 party system, if you don't vote for Harris, you are helping elect Trump. Hold your nose if you must, but vote for Harris and then work like hell to change the whole system. Taking some "stance" is only going to destroy what little is left of our democracy anyway. I don't understand how people don't understand this

DP
Oh I understand it perfectly. And I’m not voting for Kamala. Or Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are we talking “just voting for Trump and being normal otherwise” or are we talking “addicted to Rogan, Tucker Carlson, and Tim Pool; can’t form a sentence without referring to how 2020 was robbed; and is obsessive about shopping for guns and ammo?”

NP. You would have had a point in 2016, before we knew what Trump actually would do and be in the Oval Office. At this point in the game, when we know what we know, especially Jan. 6 and what he recently said about his followers “never having to vote again,” there is no longer a difference between “just voting for Trump” and all those other nutbag indicators. There is no longer a “Trump spectrum.” Any shade of Trump is full-on, knowingly voting against democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find that most libs are the least tolerant people on the planet.

Should someone be tolerant of someone else’s intolerance? Why should I be tolerant of someone who wants, either actively or indirectly, to take rights away from people I care about?

I’m sure I’m neighbors or casual friends with people like you, but to be comfortable having a close relationship with someone who is so callous about the rights of others? Nope. Not for me.

- Educated, successful, wealthy woman who is the child of a legal immigrant. I have a lot of friends that would be significantly disadvantaged if the policies promoted by Trump and his ilk would become law.

Would you mind expanding on this a bit?

Nope. You do the work.

Hahahaha. Ok. So you’re using hyperbole and then can’t actually back it up. Not surprising.

DP. To start, every woman in the US. Every person who interacts with the government in some way. Every disenfranchised voter. And the list goes on.

How? How are they impacted? Be specific please.
I interact with the government. How will I be impacted? I’m a woman. How will I be impacted?

Have you read project 2025? Can you read?

How is this relevant? Trump has disavowed Project 2025.

Did you read his presidential plan for the last election?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c977njnvq2do.amp

I read this article. Don’t see anything horrible here.

The problem is posters make these sweeping generalizations about people being significantly disadvantaged, yet it looks like they’re basing this on incorrect information. If you’re citing Project 2025 your argument is already invalid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find that most libs are the least tolerant people on the planet.

Should someone be tolerant of someone else’s intolerance? Why should I be tolerant of someone who wants, either actively or indirectly, to take rights away from people I care about?

I’m sure I’m neighbors or casual friends with people like you, but to be comfortable having a close relationship with someone who is so callous about the rights of others? Nope. Not for me.

- Educated, successful, wealthy woman who is the child of a legal immigrant. I have a lot of friends that would be significantly disadvantaged if the policies promoted by Trump and his ilk would become law.

Would you mind expanding on this a bit?

Nope. You do the work.

Hahahaha. Ok. So you’re using hyperbole and then can’t actually back it up. Not surprising.

DP. To start, every woman in the US. Every person who interacts with the government in some way. Every disenfranchised voter. And the list goes on.

How? How are they impacted? Be specific please.
I interact with the government. How will I be impacted? I’m a woman. How will I be impacted?

Have you read project 2025? Can you read?

How is this relevant? Trump has disavowed Project 2025.

No he hasn’t he just had Paul dans fired.

“I have no idea who is behind it,” Trump continued on Truth Social. “I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/07/05/politics/trump-distance-project-2025

[Anonymous]

Let us know when he’s single.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find that most libs are the least tolerant people on the planet.

Should someone be tolerant of someone else’s intolerance? Why should I be tolerant of someone who wants, either actively or indirectly, to take rights away from people I care about?

I’m sure I’m neighbors or casual friends with people like you, but to be comfortable having a close relationship with someone who is so callous about the rights of others? Nope. Not for me.

- Educated, successful, wealthy woman who is the child of a legal immigrant. I have a lot of friends that would be significantly disadvantaged if the policies promoted by Trump and his ilk would become law.

Would you mind expanding on this a bit?

Nope. You do the work.

Hahahaha. Ok. So you’re using hyperbole and then can’t actually back it up. Not surprising.

DP. To start, every woman in the US. Every person who interacts with the government in some way. Every disenfranchised voter. And the list goes on.

How? How are they impacted? Be specific please.
I interact with the government. How will I be impacted? I’m a woman. How will I be impacted?

Have you read project 2025? Can you read?

How is this relevant? Trump has disavowed Project 2025.

Did you read his presidential plan for the last election?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c977njnvq2do.amp

I read this article. Don’t see anything horrible here.

The problem is posters make these sweeping generalizations about people being significantly disadvantaged, yet it looks like they’re basing this on incorrect information. If you’re citing Project 2025 your argument is already invalid.

Well if you don’t see anything horrible then u r horrible.

Did you read his presidential plan for the last election?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the party here. I'm a left leaning centrist who has generally voted democratic for as long as I can remember. I can say that it would be VERY hard for me to vote for Kamala. Based solely on her actions, she was ranked as the most liberal senator just five years ago. And it looks like she's leaning toward Buttigieg, who is similarly liberal. Such an administration would almost certainly focus its energies on social change and cause a myriad of problems while more pressing existential issues fall to the wayside. I don't want to vote for Trump, but it's like the dems have lost their minds in their echo chamber and are coercing me to do so. Why can't they come up with someone better?

Except here's the problem... in our 2 party system, if you don't vote for Harris, you are helping elect Trump. Hold your nose if you must, but vote for Harris and then work like hell to change the whole system. Taking some "stance" is only going to destroy what little is left of our democracy anyway. I don't understand how people don't understand this

DP
Oh I understand it perfectly. And I’m not voting for Kamala. Or Trump.

Then thanks for electing Trump, you dimwit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the party here. I'm a left leaning centrist who has generally voted democratic for as long as I can remember. I can say that it would be VERY hard for me to vote for Kamala. Based solely on her actions, she was ranked as the most liberal senator just five years ago. And it looks like she's leaning toward Buttigieg, who is similarly liberal. Such an administration would almost certainly focus its energies on social change and cause a myriad of problems while more pressing existential issues fall to the wayside. I don't want to vote for Trump, but it's like the dems have lost their minds in their echo chamber and are coercing me to do so. Why can't they come up with someone better?

Except here's the problem... in our 2 party system, if you don't vote for Harris, you are helping elect Trump. Hold your nose if you must, but vote for Harris and then work like hell to change the whole system. Taking some "stance" is only going to destroy what little is left of our democracy anyway. I don't understand how people don't understand this

DP
Oh I understand it perfectly. And I’m not voting for Kamala. Or Trump.

Then thanks for electing Trump, you dimwit.

You’re welcome!