“Domestic supply of infants”

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:"Domestic supply of infants" = human trafficking = P*zz*g*te. Look up adre no chrome. Moloch worshipers.


You're not a q person, and neither are people worried about fertility rates.


Live birthrates is an extreme issue. At our present pace, we will be outstripped by non-Americans by 2050. Same for Europe.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I really take issue with the concept of increasing the birth rate as a means to take care of elderly generations. That is not the solution we should be going for.



Tell me you have no understanding of economics without telling me you have no understanding of economics.


Old people do not work. Old people generally do not buy stuff. The big consumer group is young parents. The younger generation is providing *financial* basis for elderly care. Old people live on fixed incomes and depend on stable financial markets and stable economy, which is provided by the younger generation. It’s always worked this way in the modern era.


Do you get turned on talking down to people?

Overpopulation in the face of scarce resources is a legitimate concern.



Yes condescension and sarcasm are my kinks. Are you new to DCUM?


What about the overpopulation concern? Economy goes to the crapper no matter what when resources become scarce.

"Winter is coming"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:"Domestic supply of infants" = human trafficking = P*zz*g*te. Look up adre no chrome. Moloch worshipers.


You're not a q person, and neither are people worried about fertility rates.


Live birthrates is an extreme issue. At our present pace, we will be outstripped by non-Americans by 2050. Same for Europe.


So? Who cares? It’s survival of the fittest- maybe white folks aren’t the fittest.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:"Domestic supply of infants" = human trafficking = P*zz*g*te. Look up adre no chrome. Moloch worshipers.


You're not a q person, and neither are people worried about fertility rates.


Live birthrates is an extreme issue. At our present pace, we will be outstripped by non-Americans by 2050. Same for Europe.


So? Who cares? It’s survival of the fittest- maybe white folks aren’t the fittest.


I understand mob rule wasn't trendy until a particular group wasn't the mob.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The elderly crisis is coming. The demographics are not good:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/14/health/long-term-care-facilities-costs.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

I do not see a need to go out and multiply because of this
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I agree that ALL adoption should be illegal. I have seen it use in a way that the children are just pawns. There is no reason that children cannot be in guardianship relationships. In fact, in my will, I have stated that my parents will become my children's guardian if I die but that they should NEVER be able to adopt them. My children do not need new parents. That is disgusting. They have parents (dead ones, but parents). I don't want the grandparents (or anyone else) being called "mom" and "dad" and pretend that I didn't exist (it's mean to the children!)

And, same with surrogacy -- if you cannot have children, I am sorry but take on a guardianship of an older child. There is a privacy right to have sex/babies but no right of surrogacy. It just devalues older children which is disgusting.


You’re super into yourself and getting acknowledgment - is it all about you all the time? Poor kids. I hope you don’t have a daughter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The obsession with getting a "healthy infant" at all costs confounds me. I definitely believe it's part of the forced-birth ideology. There are a lot of women out there praying nightly that some 15 year old white girl who never drank or did drugs gets pregnant in red state far from a blue state, just so she can have her perfect newborn.


I believe this is part of the propaganda fed to vulnerable women who don't have children, but want to adopt a healthy white child. That's why they support banning abortion. They want to have these lovely, healthy white children to adopt, and for their childless friends to adopt.

Sickening. Sick.

No, they want to ban abortion because they don’t think women are full people, entitled to the same rights to bodily autonomy and self determination as men. That they think they can pick off some infants to take as their own and rear to be equally extremists is a bonus.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:"Domestic supply of infants" = human trafficking = P*zz*g*te. Look up adre no chrome. Moloch worshipers.


You're not a q person, and neither are people worried about fertility rates.


Live birthrates is an extreme issue. At our present pace, we will be outstripped by non-Americans by 2050. Same for Europe.


"Outstripped"? Is this some sort of race?

But if too many "non-Americans" is the issue, we should let in as many pregnant immigrants as possible, right?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The elderly crisis is coming. The demographics are not good:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/14/health/long-term-care-facilities-costs.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

I do not see a need to go out and multiply because of this



Ok but you can’t post complaining about old homeless people pooping in the street.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The elderly crisis is coming. The demographics are not good:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/14/health/long-term-care-facilities-costs.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

I do not see a need to go out and multiply because of this


Plenty of hardworking young people want to immigrate, illegal or otherwise. We don't need to force women to have babies they can't afford to take care of.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: