Maret’s brand of progressive

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How progressive are they? Toured last year and saw some interesting things like a “Unapologetically Queer” in the elementary school library. Do they talk to elementary aged kids about gender identity? Any insight is appreciated.

Are you referring to an adult, a child, a poster, a book? What exactly did you see? And if anything being unapologetically queer bothers you, go elsewhere.


Ok, calm down. I see OP's concern - would a straight child be welcome?


A couple of years ago, a trans Maret kid killed himself. However progressive Maret is, it is not enough to save him.




First of all, that’s super sad and tragic. Poor kid and his poor family.

Well, that’s the problem. A bunch of posters do nothing to address real issues.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How progressive are they? Toured last year and saw some interesting things like a “Unapologetically Queer” in the elementary school library. Do they talk to elementary aged kids about gender identity? Any insight is appreciated.

Are you referring to an adult, a child, a poster, a book? What exactly did you see? And if anything being unapologetically queer bothers you, go elsewhere.


This. Also, there are all types of kids there but it is a progressive school. More power to them.


Not OP, but I think many parents are somewhat concerned about the extent to which progressive political sloganeering has become part of the educational environment. I don't think the concern is with queer people per se, but rather, having everything be such a main focus of time and attention. Of course, everyone wants their kids to be accepting and welcoming. That is not the same thing as having an environment where certain groups are essentially put on a pedestal, and then there is social pressure to be like that or to go out of your way to praise it (when other kids aren't getting that praise just for being who they happen to be).


The entire culture is designed to support cisgendered heterosexual relationships. Straight kids get validation for who they happen to be every day - that's the default in our culture. Every plotline in a movie where a man and a woman fall in love, every ad that shows an opposite sex couple, every story that talks about a family with a mom and a dad -- that's praise, and it's been the default for centuries. It's more than a little disingenuous to claim that straight kids are harmed when they aren't centered for 30 seconds.


The vast super majority of the world population is not gay, or trans, or confused about their gender. That is a tiny sliver of people, so no that doesn’t warrant all the wall space in an elementary school library or half the book list, or every assembly.
To do that is the glorification of a small tiny minority, and no time to study actual topics helpful to science or math or reading comp.

If you want to be an activist or a social worker, do it as an EC, not 5-10 hours a week at elementary school curricula.


This
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How bizarre that overnight we are living in a world where we are even talking to elementary school kids about if they want to be a boy or a girl and that “gender identity” is even a concept to be discussed at school. Who is pushing this and why are we going along with it? 25 years ago you would have been thought to be mentally unwell if you suggested a K student with a penis could be a girl.

Lgbtqia2+ activists did this and liberal public and private schools love it. Brainwashing kids works! In college before and now in pk-12. Perfect delivery method.
All these books are copyright 2019+.
Big time money makers.
Jump on the lgbtqia2+ and DEI bandwagon.
Internet influencers can help your kid change as well. Go for it!
Explore your gender, Explore your orientation. That’s what school is for. In America.

UK and EU formally and politically pulled all of this nonsense from schools and pulled affirmative therapy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How bizarre that overnight we are living in a world where we are even talking to elementary school kids about if they want to be a boy or a girl and that “gender identity” is even a concept to be discussed at school. Who is pushing this and why are we going along with it? 25 years ago you would have been thought to be mentally unwell if you suggested a K student with a penis could be a girl.


The priests, pastors,... all those child molesters.



Priests and pastors are pushing this? Huh? You have lost your marbles.


you spend all your time railing about imaginary problems that you ignore the real abusers. That’s why they’ve got got you mindless morons all freaked out
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Their brand of being progressive seems like the worst kind -- very performative but they don't walk the walk given that they are restricting access to a public field. SMH

https://wamu.org/story/19/09/02/a-d-c-private-school-has-had-special-access-to-a-public-field-for-almost-a-decade/


Not a Maret parent, but this one is so ridiculous. Maret paid to improve the field and a deal was signed for them to have access for HS sports. If you don't like the deal, then blame the city who agreed to it.


The deal was structured to be below the level for meaningful scrutiny and it was fine when a Market parent was on the city council. You can argue about whether Market was in the right or not, but it was definitely not a progressive move or a move that increased equity in the city


Actually it does. That field is in service and used by everyone. The Duke Ellington field is used by no one. Wish my kids could use the Duke Ellington field for sports after school.


It is a city field. Marie should be not have preferential access to it. Full stop.


It’s a DCPR field and no one was using it during the time Maret wanted to use it(2-5 week days in the fall and spring). It was a great deal for the city and all the neighborhood kids, teams and clubs who use the field. Hardy was not using it for the 30 years before DCPR and Maret agreed to renovation and maintenance. They have no plans to use in the future. So there is no conflict with anyone.

Why should a middle school which has a field, tennis courts, a track and a large parking lot take control of a public park and deny access to everyone? Everyone knows DCPS will not maintain the field. It will be like the abandon Duke Ellington Field but locked all the time. No more club sports, rec team, public access.

Nope I want my kids to use the field.


Have you spoken to the BGCGW kids at Jelleff about how much they get to use the field?

Maret is progressive enough within its bubble but has never been a good neighbor, regardless of the marketing rhetoric on their website.


So what? It is a private school that charges a premium. What do you expect? Start your own if you are so salty.


This makes you uncomfortable but it’s on point. This thread is about how progressive Maret, a private school, is. The Jelleff arrangement is an example of how it isn’t.
Anonymous
Reading the Holton post about all the white girls getting invited to Mrs. Simpson's and wondering if this happens at Maret too. Any insight? I hope Maret families are considered "too progressive" to be part of those blatantly racist "classes."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Reading the Holton post about all the white girls getting invited to Mrs. Simpson's and wondering if this happens at Maret too. Any insight? I hope Maret families are considered "too progressive" to be part of those blatantly racist "classes."


Based on what I've read on this thread, I suspect the Maret parents and kids are too busy gatekeeping the Jelleff fields from the Georgetown neighborhood riffraff to be bothered with this kind of nonsense.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How bizarre that overnight we are living in a world where we are even talking to elementary school kids about if they want to be a boy or a girl and that “gender identity” is even a concept to be discussed at school. Who is pushing this and why are we going along with it? 25 years ago you would have been thought to be mentally unwell if you suggested a K student with a penis could be a girl.


The priests, pastors,... all those child molesters.



Priests and pastors are pushing this? Huh? You have lost your marbles.


you spend all your time railing about imaginary problems that you ignore the real abusers. That’s why they’ve got got you mindless morons all freaked out


Stop deflecting. You are all too busy literally abusing kids psychologically at mass scale followed by drugging and mutilating them to change their gender and you want to deflect to a small minority of clergy who commit sexual abuse. Nice try.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How bizarre that overnight we are living in a world where we are even talking to elementary school kids about if they want to be a boy or a girl and that “gender identity” is even a concept to be discussed at school. Who is pushing this and why are we going along with it? 25 years ago you would have been thought to be mentally unwell if you suggested a K student with a penis could be a girl.


The priests, pastors,... all those child molesters.



Priests and pastors are pushing this? Huh? You have lost your marbles.


you spend all your time railing about imaginary problems that you ignore the real abusers. That’s why they’ve got got you mindless morons all freaked out


Stop deflecting. You are all too busy literally abusing kids psychologically at mass scale followed by drugging and mutilating them to change their gender and you want to deflect to a small minority of clergy who commit sexual abuse. Nice try.


The percentage of kids who are trans is minuscule compared to the percentage of the clergy who abused and abuse kids. Not to mention the church’s complicity in covering it up.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How progressive are they? Toured last year and saw some interesting things like a “Unapologetically Queer” in the elementary school library. Do they talk to elementary aged kids about gender identity? Any insight is appreciated.

Are you referring to an adult, a child, a poster, a book? What exactly did you see? And if anything being unapologetically queer bothers you, go elsewhere.


Ok, calm down. I see OP's concern - would a straight child be welcome?


A couple of years ago, a trans Maret kid killed himself. However progressive Maret is, it is not enough to save him.




First of all, that’s super sad and tragic. Poor kid and his poor family.

Well, that’s the problem. A bunch of posters do nothing to address real issues.


The real issue being what? Unmanaged mental disorders?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How bizarre that overnight we are living in a world where we are even talking to elementary school kids about if they want to be a boy or a girl and that “gender identity” is even a concept to be discussed at school. Who is pushing this and why are we going along with it? 25 years ago you would have been thought to be mentally unwell if you suggested a K student with a penis could be a girl.


The priests, pastors,... all those child molesters.



Priests and pastors are pushing this? Huh? You have lost your marbles.


you spend all your time railing about imaginary problems that you ignore the real abusers. That’s why they’ve got got you mindless morons all freaked out


Stop deflecting. You are all too busy literally abusing kids psychologically at mass scale followed by drugging and mutilating them to change their gender and you want to deflect to a small minority of clergy who commit sexual abuse. Nice try.


The percentage of kids who are trans is minuscule compared to the percentage of the clergy who abused and abuse kids. Not to mention the church’s complicity in covering it up.



Put some numbers on that. Less semantics.

# of USA kids total. (20, 15, 10, 5, 0 years ago)
# of USA kids as trans (“) (is this just a self ID? No neuropsych or duration required?)

# of USA kids total (60, 40, 20, 10, 0 years ago)
# of clergy (“) (or annual avg over 60 yr span?)
# of clergy molesters (“)
# of USA kids molested by clergy (“)

Thx.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How bizarre that overnight we are living in a world where we are even talking to elementary school kids about if they want to be a boy or a girl and that “gender identity” is even a concept to be discussed at school. Who is pushing this and why are we going along with it? 25 years ago you would have been thought to be mentally unwell if you suggested a K student with a penis could be a girl.


The priests, pastors,... all those child molesters.



Priests and pastors are pushing this? Huh? You have lost your marbles.


you spend all your time railing about imaginary problems that you ignore the real abusers. That’s why they’ve got got you mindless morons all freaked out


Stop deflecting. You are all too busy literally abusing kids psychologically at mass scale followed by drugging and mutilating them to change their gender and you want to deflect to a small minority of clergy who commit sexual abuse. Nice try.


The percentage of kids who are trans is minuscule compared to the percentage of the clergy who abused and abuse kids. Not to mention the church’s complicity in covering it up.



More trendy to be non-binary. Fairfax public school student surveys are clocking in at 33% of the class IDing as such.

Unclear how widespread or concentrated abusive clergy were.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How bizarre that overnight we are living in a world where we are even talking to elementary school kids about if they want to be a boy or a girl and that “gender identity” is even a concept to be discussed at school. Who is pushing this and why are we going along with it? 25 years ago you would have been thought to be mentally unwell if you suggested a K student with a penis could be a girl.


The priests, pastors,... all those child molesters.



Priests and pastors are pushing this? Huh? You have lost your marbles.


you spend all your time railing about imaginary problems that you ignore the real abusers. That’s why they’ve got got you mindless morons all freaked out


Stop deflecting. You are all too busy literally abusing kids psychologically at mass scale followed by drugging and mutilating them to change their gender and you want to deflect to a small minority of clergy who commit sexual abuse. Nice try.


The percentage of kids who are trans is minuscule compared to the percentage of the clergy who abused and abuse kids. Not to mention the church’s complicity in covering it up.



More trendy to be non-binary. Fairfax public school student surveys are clocking in at 33% of the class IDing as such.

Unclear how widespread or concentrated abusive clergy were.


Amazing how much you want to minimize actual child abuse.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How bizarre that overnight we are living in a world where we are even talking to elementary school kids about if they want to be a boy or a girl and that “gender identity” is even a concept to be discussed at school. Who is pushing this and why are we going along with it? 25 years ago you would have been thought to be mentally unwell if you suggested a K student with a penis could be a girl.


The priests, pastors,... all those child molesters.



Priests and pastors are pushing this? Huh? You have lost your marbles.


you spend all your time railing about imaginary problems that you ignore the real abusers. That’s why they’ve got got you mindless morons all freaked out


Stop deflecting. You are all too busy literally abusing kids psychologically at mass scale followed by drugging and mutilating them to change their gender and you want to deflect to a small minority of clergy who commit sexual abuse. Nice try.


The percentage of kids who are trans is minuscule compared to the percentage of the clergy who abused and abuse kids. Not to mention the church’s complicity in covering it up.



More trendy to be non-binary. Fairfax public school student surveys are clocking in at 33% of the class IDing as such.

Unclear how widespread or concentrated abusive clergy were.


Amazing how much you want to minimize actual child abuse.


Clergy sexual abuse existing and being real doesn’t take away from the gender identity indoctrination version of child abuse. They are not mutually exclusive, you doodoo for brains.
Anonymous
Fairfax public school student surveys are clocking in at 33% of the class IDing as such.


They are expressing their support. Or they are pushing-back against surveys, in general, and adults trying to analyze students. Or they are just plain trying to mess with adults and this is an easy way to get a reaction.
Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools
Go to: