Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DP. It depended on what group your child was placed in. Agree - count yourself lucky.
Please stop repeating this myth over and over. Kids were in separate spelling groups according to ability based on a spelling test, yes. But the reading groups were up to the kids - they choose what books to read from several choices. And those group were constantly changing based on what book the kid chose. There were not two separate groups - unless you are saying the teacher had a group of favorites, but they were not assigned different work - except for levels of spelling words. Or when the kids got to choose which type of project to do - or how involved to get in the project. At least we never saw that in the two years we experienced with the 4th grade teacher with two different kids.
Yes, you are correct. This poster is stretching the truth or is delusional. Both my kids had her. Sure, she was tough but not anything like what they're describing.
Two groups in the same class. One group had "Thursday" and "apple" on their spelling exam when the other group had "tetrarchy" but were graded on the same grading rubric?
But if you were someone who signed off on the paperwork or a parent who's kid benefitted from that, I can see why you would try to defend it?
I've posted this before but my kid was in the lower spelling group. I thought the words were easy. I asked to move him to the higher group. She moved him. Zero issues. Maybe you're overthinking it?
Same with us, but I couldn't even tell there was a difference between the groups. DC wanted to switch to be with their friends and the teacher said it was fine.
Which book?
You must not have a kid, @PBES. The groups were for spelling words. It wasn't a big deal.
About books, my kids read approximately a book a month in CES. Kids could choose 1 of 3-4 books each month; these choices were set by the CES curriculum used by every center. It had nothing to do with spelling groups. That poster just forgot to take their meds again.
Now I know you're you're not a PBES parent or teacher.
I don't know why MCPS CO staff and BOE members get on this post and pretend to be parents? It's very strange.
The poster obsessed with the teacher that left years ago could be a parent but definitely has mental health issues.
The poster who keeps lying (why?) about when a teacher left even though it’s verifiably true that it was last year clearly has mental health issues and compulsive lying tendencies on a par with Trump.
There are several other posters with multiple but different concerns. All of whom know that the teacher was there last year and wonder why there are so many weird posts on this thread,
It seems to be just one poster obsessed with the CES teacher that left a few years ago. They seem unhinged and would be well served by seeking therapy.
I’ve posted several times. I’m not the poster who complains about reading groups and spelling (which I’ve seen before on DCUM but didn’t jive with my kids experience). I’m not the poster/s who shared many of the complaints. There are multiple posters.
I’m beginning to think that there is just one person saying the opposite (she’s tough but “my child grew tremendously”, parents didn’t want homework, she left years ago (untrue for the record), was promoted, CES is the same curriculum etc) again and again, posting the same things using the same language for pages.
Talk about obsessive! You won’t let it drop!
I mean how obsessive can you be to keep insisting a teacher left “years ago” when that’s a bold faced lie. I’m not even sure why that is even important and have no clue why you are lying and continuing to do so.