+1 |
We are considering pulling our kid in fear of ruining his education and chances into getting into a decent school. |
Odyssey was 7th grade curriculum for GT (back when that was the program). |
The amount of misunderstanding you're displaying here is astounding. By all measures the White, Asian, and affluent students at McLean are still performing at the top of the district. The updated GS score is absolutely meaningless. West Springfield HS has a 9/10 but the SAT and AP scores out of there are literally below the county average. McLean's AP scores are leading the county besides TJ, and SAT scores fall just short of Langley (also ignoring TJ). |
I read the “sad” at the end in Trump’s voice. Anyone else? |
There is some question as to whether PP actually has kids at McLean, although Jeff continues to allow them to post. Most of the people at McLean are very happy with the education that their kids are getting, despite the overcrowding and less than stellar physical plant. Of course, if we acknowledge this, someone else will turn that against us and say there's no reason to pay any attention to the building conditions as long as most parents are happy with the academics, teachers, extra-curriculars, etc. |
McLean also just came in second in the Class 6 Scholastic Bowl state championship behind TJ, after having won a regional competition that included Langley, Madison, Marshall, Oakton, Yorktown, W-L, and South Lakes, among other schools (TJ was in a different region). |
Yep, it came across as a bit of a verbal tic, as if someone who was trolling couldn't help but say something to give it away. Kind of like "TIA" is also used in some cases. |
Shameful! They're neglected and it shows in these scores! McLean HS is a shadow of its former self. Time for everyone to pull their kids and send them to Potomac. Or anywhere as long as its not McLean HS! |
I think the McLean frustration also stems from the fact that it’s going to be 10+ years before any renovation can be evaluated, planned or begun. It’s pretty unfortunate to think that a kid in 2nd grade right now will attend a school that is so far deteriorated (and if it’s bad now, where will it be in 10 years). I guess it’s great that the current three year olds in the pyramid will benefit!!??
|
"the school's current physical condition" |
Yorktown is not in the same district as McLean. The point about scaling back some of the current renovations was not to suggest that we should not spend at least as much, if not more, money on improvements to school facilities. The point is that, if there is a fixed capital budget, we might consider whether spreading that money around to more schools makes more sense than concentrating it on a relatively small number of schools at any time. It's consistent with some of the recent statements made by Chuck Fanshaw, the acting head of FCPS Facilities and Transportation, who took over after Jeff Platenberg's departure. Platenberg seemed to favor a smaller number of "big projects" that make some schools look great, and get a lot of money into the pockets of contractors, but leave other schools neglected. Fanshaw wants to have more money set aside to deal with schools that have pressing maintenance challenges, even if they aren't otherwise currently in the queue for a full, soup-to-nuts renovation. |
Seems like a nice set-up: first, post some way over-the-top rhetoric that McLean has been uniquely neglected and is now on the verge of total and complete collapse; and then, second, follow up by saying it comes across as so clueless that McLean should get nothing. I mean, well played, maybe, but others will still rightfully advocate for FCPS to build an addition to the school and address the most pressing facilities needs. I'm sure you'd do likewise if it were your school. |
DP but: 1. Yes, Yorktown is APS, not FCPS. 2. Most McLean families wanted to stay at McLean; others argued for a boundary change and/or asserted they should be the ones moved to Langley. If you check the materials circulated by McSpaces, which was the most "formal" advocacy group for McLean parents in 2019, their position was "the situation calls for a two-prong approach: a targeted boundary adjustment with Langley HS and an expansion to McLean HS." [In comparison, the position of a spokesperson for the Great Falls Citizens Association, which represented many Langley parents, was as follows: "Shadid said that an expansion of McLean High School in place of a boundary adjustment would have been the best solution. "It would offer long-term relief for MHS while leaving more room for growth at Langley. We believe that more capacity at MHS is still urgent because of the rapid growth in the two pyramids."] 3. The bathrooms are gross, because they are regularly out of order due to the obsolete plumbing, and when confronted with bathrooms that aren't working, students will express their frustration in predicable ways (the bathrooms are set to be renovated this summer, and we'll see whether that improves things). 4. No comment. |
The students aren't neglected. |