IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

You are delusional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

Which specific dem senators do you think would vote for conviction?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

A $40,000 check to Biden (10 percent for the big guy!) isn’t evidence?

A check is not evidence if there is no underlying crime as the source of the money, so no, not evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

No, there aren't 22 Dems in the House who will vote for a Biden impeachment. And you realize if the Dems get washed out in the Senate, then it is likely Biden would have lost re-election. so what is the point?

There is no crime, no evidence, nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

Name 'em. You don't need to name 22. You can name like 5 or 10. Those votes do not exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

Bibi has nothing to do with this, go discuss him on literally every other thread here. I maintain that if you actually believe 17 Democratic Senators will vote to convict Biden with zero evidence you need your head examined.

[Anonymous]

This is a must watch

And remind me again, McCarthy and Jordan were both "elected officials" too, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a must watch

And remind me again, McCarthy and Jordan were both "elected officials" too, right?

They really the dumbest people alive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a must watch

And remind me again, McCarthy and Jordan were both "elected officials" too, right?

Wow, he is dumb as a stump. How did he ever get elected to Congress?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

The Republicans are great at losing (maybe they even enjoy losing?) but they’re not going to have an actual impeachment hearing because it won’t even pass the House. You understand how high the bar is for high crimes, yeah?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

The Republicans are great at losing (maybe they even enjoy losing?) but they’re not going to have an actual impeachment hearing because it won’t even pass the House. You understand how high the bar is for high crimes, yeah?

Lol sure like republicans are going to hold Biden’s impeachment to a high bar. Impeachment is not a trial. It is a political process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

Name 'em. You don't need to name 22. You can name like 5 or 10. Those votes do not exist.

22 in the house and the following in the senate

Kyrsten Sinema
Jon Tester
Michael Bennet
Mark Warner
Joe Manchin
Tom Carper
Angus King
Jeanne Shaheen
Hassan, Maggie
Chris Coons

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

Name 'em. You don't need to name 22. You can name like 5 or 10. Those votes do not exist.

22 in the house and the following in the senate

Kyrsten Sinema
Jon Tester
Michael Bennet
Mark Warner
Joe Manchin
Tom Carper
Angus King
Jeanne Shaheen
Hassan, Maggie
Chris Coons

That is a joke of a list. And it's still not enough to get a conviction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More gaslighting from Jim Jordan

Why won’t the republicans move forward with impeach? What is their problem?

They haven’t found any evidence of a crime. It’s all innuendo based on misinformation. No quid. No pro. No quo.

You do not need evidence. All you need is votes. They would be doing the dems a big favor removing Biden.

If you think they have the votes to remove Biden you need to have your head examined.

Well there are 22 dems in house who will vote against his. Bibi does not like Biden and has campaigned against him in the past. So the house is not a problem. I could easily see the Republicans picking up the needed votes from dem senators to get to 2/3.

The Republicans are great at losing (maybe they even enjoy losing?) but they’re not going to have an actual impeachment hearing because it won’t even pass the House. You understand how high the bar is for high crimes, yeah?

Lol sure like republicans are going to hold Biden’s impeachment to a high bar. Impeachment is not a trial. It is a political process.

Yes, it is, and many house republicans realize how impeaching him over nothing will blow back on them in the next election.

[Anonymous]

First post in full:

BREAKING‼️ More subpoenas and interview requests issued today in the Biden family investigation by
@GOPoversight
Chairman
@RepJamesComer
. These cover 3 of Hunter Biden’s business associates, his NYC gallerist and an art patron, a Delaware donor of his father’s, and two people associated with his uncle Jim Biden:
•Eric Schwerin (Subpoena)
•Mervyn Yan (Subpoena)
•George Bergès (Subpoena)
•Elizabeth Naftali (Subpoena)
•Carol Fox
•Joey Langston
•John Hynansky
•Jason Galanis