2030 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How was the UMD play day over the weekend?

Think this is the results of games in A bracket.

Coppermine 2-0-1
Nxt 2-1
YJ 1-2
Skywalkers 0-2-1

Does this mean that coppermine tied skywalkers??!!

Yes, and YJ beat Skywalkers

[Anonymous]

After the top 3 2030 teams (MDU East; M&D Black and Hero’s Green), a lot of the others are very similar in skill level and can all beat each other depending on who is playing well that day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After the top 3 2030 teams (MDU East; M&D Black and Hero’s Green), a lot of the others are very similar in skill level and can all beat each other depending on who is playing well that day.

I know exactly what you mean. Like the time Skywalkers took Heros Green to overtime a few weeks ago. Game could have gone either way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After the top 3 2030 teams (MDU East; M&D Black and Hero’s Green), a lot of the others are very similar in skill level and can all beat each other depending on who is playing well that day.

Is it the same Hero's team who has a record of 11-11-1??

[Anonymous]

All of the teams named above, at the HS level, ultimately all the same and will get their players seen by college coaches. There is no college that only looks at M&D, MDU, Hero's Green or White, Coppermine, YJ, NXT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All of the teams named above, at the HS level, ultimately all the same and will get their players seen by college coaches. There is no college that only looks at M&D, MDU, Hero's Green or White, Coppermine, YJ, NXT.

True, but being in the top brackets brings more colleges and more frequency. Not sure big difference between bracket 1 or 3, but certainly when you get to Presidents Cup or LFTC with 28 brackets, you wanna be in the top ones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of the teams named above, at the HS level, ultimately all the same and will get their players seen by college coaches. There is no college that only looks at M&D, MDU, Hero's Green or White, Coppermine, YJ, NXT.

True, but being in the top brackets brings more colleges and more frequency. Not sure big difference between bracket 1 or 3, but certainly when you get to Presidents Cup or LFTC with 28 brackets, you wanna be in the top ones.

There's a noticeable difference between the top 5-10 teams in each age group and the next tier. That's not to say they are more talented, they just play better as a team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of the teams named above, at the HS level, ultimately all the same and will get their players seen by college coaches. There is no college that only looks at M&D, MDU, Hero's Green or White, Coppermine, YJ, NXT.

True, but being in the top brackets brings more colleges and more frequency. Not sure big difference between bracket 1 or 3, but certainly when you get to Presidents Cup or LFTC with 28 brackets, you wanna be in the top ones.

There's a noticeable difference between the top 5-10 teams in each age group and the next tier. That's not to say they are more talented, they just play better as a team.

I think the big difference is depth. Our team is mediocre overall but we have 5-8 girls who could compete with some of the best. The top teams have 24 girls who are as good as our top 5-8 players are we cannot keep up with the skill at every position for their first and second string. We often start strong and lose badly in the 2nd half.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of the teams named above, at the HS level, ultimately all the same and will get their players seen by college coaches. There is no college that only looks at M&D, MDU, Hero's Green or White, Coppermine, YJ, NXT.

True, but being in the top brackets brings more colleges and more frequency. Not sure big difference between bracket 1 or 3, but certainly when you get to Presidents Cup or LFTC with 28 brackets, you wanna be in the top ones.

There's a noticeable difference between the top 5-10 teams in each age group and the next tier. That's not to say they are more talented, they just play better as a team.

I think the big difference is depth. Our team is mediocre overall but we have 5-8 girls who could compete with some of the best. The top teams have 24 girls who are as good as our top 5-8 players are we cannot keep up with the skill at every position for their first and second string. We often start strong and lose badly in the 2nd half.

Are you M&D DC?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of the teams named above, at the HS level, ultimately all the same and will get their players seen by college coaches. There is no college that only looks at M&D, MDU, Hero's Green or White, Coppermine, YJ, NXT.

True, but being in the top brackets brings more colleges and more frequency. Not sure big difference between bracket 1 or 3, but certainly when you get to Presidents Cup or LFTC with 28 brackets, you wanna be in the top ones.

There's a noticeable difference between the top 5-10 teams in each age group and the next tier. That's not to say they are more talented, they just play better as a team.

I think the big difference is depth. Our team is mediocre overall but we have 5-8 girls who could compete with some of the best. The top teams have 24 girls who are as good as our top 5-8 players are we cannot keep up with the skill at every position for their first and second string. We often start strong and lose badly in the 2nd half.

Are you M&D DC?

I don’t think M&D DC plays any top teams for this to occur, I’d guess more like YJ.

[Anonymous]

That description fits many of the mid-level A teams. It could be anyone of them.

[Anonymous]

I would not describe a mid-level A team as mediocre. But I would M&D DC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All of the teams named above, at the HS level, ultimately all the same and will get their players seen by college coaches. There is no college that only looks at M&D, MDU, Hero's Green or White, Coppermine, YJ, NXT.

True, but being in the top brackets brings more colleges and more frequency. Not sure big difference between bracket 1 or 3, but certainly when you get to Presidents Cup or LFTC with 28 brackets, you wanna be in the top ones.

There's a noticeable difference between the top 5-10 teams in each age group and the next tier. That's not to say they are more talented, they just play better as a team.

I think the big difference is depth. Our team is mediocre overall but we have 5-8 girls who could compete with some of the best. The top teams have 24 girls who are as good as our top 5-8 players are we cannot keep up with the skill at every position for their first and second string. We often start strong and lose badly in the 2nd half.

Are you M&D DC?

I don’t think M&D DC plays any top teams for this to occur, I’d guess more like YJ.

Probably YJ. They have around 5 or 6 players that could play anywhere. DD plays with some of them on other teams. Not sure what's going on with the rest of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: I would not describe a mid-level A team as mediocre. But I would M&D DC

If there were tiers, M&D DC would be around 4th or 5th tier. Can't imagine what MDU DC would be. Certainly worse.

[Anonymous]

Yellowjackets DMV is ranked 34th nationally.

M&D DC is 99th.

No comparison.