Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If it were just her face that was weird in the photo, I would absolutely endorse the puffy face from steroids and she edited it out of vanity explanation (as many, many people would do that). However, it doesn't explain the hands. Who would be so embarrassed about their own hands that they'd edit them? And, if they were to do that specifically for vanity purposes, they'd be hyper focused on what they looked like... so how could they forget their ring? The whole thing is really weird.

I agree. From the start, the photo editing was weird to me because it focused on weird parts of the photo. Like there really wasn't a ton of obvious photoshopping of her face (some blurring and issues near her neck and neckline, but not her face). All the really obvious photoshopping was around Charlotte and Louis. Well they didn't recently have abdominal surgery and are very cute kids, so I didn't get it.

The whole thing about it being an old photo and them altering the clothes to disguise this makes perfect sense now. In which case of course they didn't photoshop her face in, that's ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Isn't Rose also married?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is William still cheating? Is it the same person as before? Is that why H&M were always thrown under the bus, to cover for his cheating stories?

Ugh why do you guys have to keep bringing up H&M? This thread isn’t about them.

Because they’ve been trying to tell us for years what’s going on in that house and everyone just thinks they’re a bunch of liars, now we are seeing they’ve been telling us the basic truth, even if it’s their version of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this is 2024. She has three young kids and enough money to do whatever she wants. Zero chance she is going to ditch her kids. C'mon.

Who said she's ditching her kids? Are you trying to say by getting a divorce she would be ditching her kids? I hope not.

Yeah, that doesn't make sense. If they divorce it will be highly public and there is no way the British people would endorse denying a woman access to her children. The BRF would be destroyed for that. It's not even on the table.

Until recently I thought it was very unlikely she'd divorce even if she was very unhappy, because I think she enjoys her role and I think she loves her kids and would want to keep the family intact for their sake. But the last couple months have been wild. Now I don't know what I think. Only time will tell what is actually going on. I do think something is going on, though. Something other than Catherine just recovering from a planned surgery.

Since the Q died she’s been fading out of the picture.
Check their IG

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty convincing that the Mother’s Day photo was an old photo edited to look new. But why - the Mothers Day 2023 insta photo was from the same photo shoot as the Christmas 2022 shoot; they also used a photo in the same clothes for Kate & Wills’ anniversary in 2023. So old photos shouldn’t matter.

My question is, whoever did the editing, why did they edit out her ring? Photos from the charity event show her wearing it, so one would assume they intentionally edited it out. But why? Bizarre.

I agree, it's so odd. The easiest explanation is that she just wasn't wearing the ring for this photo. I do think it was taken the same day as the baby bank video based on the clothes, but it looks like it was taken at home. Maybe she doesn't wear that giant ring 100% of the time at home but always wears it for public events, and this might have just been a photo taken at home (maybe even actually by William) because the kids were dressed up and Kate's hair and makeup were done for the event and they wanted a cute pic of the four of them together.

I also don't see any obvious photoshopping on her hand itself that would indicate the ring was removed from the photo. I think she just wasn't wearing it.

This person thinks Kate's hand was photoshopped. https://twitter.com/byetwit/status/1766844203445657913?s=20

Yikes! As if Kate would be photoshopping her whole hands like this. They need a better excuse

OMG!! SHE LOST HER HANDS!!!

Dear her fingers are clearly photoshopped. Nothing about this situation is funny.

No it's not funny. She was probably wearing her ring in the original photo, but they photoshopped and deleted her ring or added someone's hand without the ring. It's a sign for us "The crazies" to prepare for something big coming on the Sunday after Easter!!! Everything they are giving us so far are actually preludes, not PR disasters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this is 2024. She has three young kids and enough money to do whatever she wants. Zero chance she is going to ditch her kids. C'mon.

no one's saying she's ditching her kids. no one.

It’s just she may not have legal custody of them. The British Royal family will have custody of her children and she may get to see them once a week.

stop. even Diana saw her kids post divorce. This isn't scientology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are we ever going to find out what really happened? If so, when?

I’m hoping that she shows back up right on schedule and they don’t make a peep about it. I’ll be an annoyed royal gossip follower but I think that would the right move.

Part of me would also love this (I really believe she has a right to medical privacy and I also think it's crazy how intense the rumors have gotten).

But because of the weird behavior from William and from the KP press office, I suspect the issues are too dramatic for this to happen. Even if they try it, I suspect the cracks will show. There is something very wrong here. No way it stays hushed up forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this is 2024. She has three young kids and enough money to do whatever she wants. Zero chance she is going to ditch her kids. C'mon.

Who said she's ditching her kids? Are you trying to say by getting a divorce she would be ditching her kids? I hope not.

Yeah, that doesn't make sense. If they divorce it will be highly public and there is no way the British people would endorse denying a woman access to her children. The BRF would be destroyed for that. It's not even on the table.

Until recently I thought it was very unlikely she'd divorce even if she was very unhappy, because I think she enjoys her role and I think she loves her kids and would want to keep the family intact for their sake. But the last couple months have been wild. Now I don't know what I think. Only time will tell what is actually going on. I do think something is going on, though. Something other than Catherine just recovering from a planned surgery.

Kate loves the role but I think she loves her kids more. I think if it got to the point them being together was detrimental to the kids she would leave.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is William still cheating? Is it the same person as before? Is that why H&M were always thrown under the bus, to cover for his cheating stories?

Yes and they’re was a very flattering piece about the mistress in British news last week. Soft launch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is William still cheating? Is it the same person as before? Is that why H&M were always thrown under the bus, to cover for his cheating stories?

Ugh why do you guys have to keep bringing up H&M? This thread isn’t about them.

Because the BRF PR strategy is to hide bad press about the monarch(s) by feeding bad stories to the press about someone lower in line. Hence why I’m wondering what William is hiding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Likely answers

https://x.com/tess78606957/status/1767245156577648788

Why would anyone believe this? It makes no sense. Why would some podunk chunk on X be cited as an authority on anything outside of her own not important life?

Why would anyone believe “Harry and Meg were thrown under the bus” after witnessing the absolute failure of Spare and +1 to produce content for Spotify and Netflix? Did MI6 make that happen, too, along with a car crash in Paris?

[Anonymous]

I can’t wait until after Easter when all you crazies will finally shut the f up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this is 2024. She has three young kids and enough money to do whatever she wants. Zero chance she is going to ditch her kids. C'mon.

no one's saying she's ditching her kids. no one.

It’s just she may not have legal custody of them. The British Royal family will have custody of her children and she may get to see them once a week.

stop. even Diana saw her kids post divorce. This isn't scientology.

This is like people thinking Charles would take Harry's kids lol. She will see the kids and be an active part of their lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this is 2024. She has three young kids and enough money to do whatever she wants. Zero chance she is going to ditch her kids. C'mon.

Who said she's ditching her kids? Are you trying to say by getting a divorce she would be ditching her kids? I hope not.

The people saying she tried to kill herself. I just don't see any way that would be happening. Over an affair?!? Please.

Gotcha. I think those kind of theories are inappropriate because of the discussions they yield, so I avoid them. Its always a possibility and people take their lives for much less. Their mindsets are wrapped and they're not thinking clearly.

She wouldn’t be killing herself over the affair. She’d be killing herself because her husband wants a divorce so he can be with the other woman, and then she will no longer have full custody over her children.

Oh, I see. Is this why Diana killed herself in that tunnel? Since of course you’ve aptly, succinctly identified why women kill themselves and all

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Likely answers

https://x.com/tess78606957/status/1767245156577648788

Why would anyone believe this? It makes no sense. Why would some podunk chunk on X be cited as an authority on anything outside of her own not important life?

Why would anyone believe “Harry and Meg were thrown under the bus” after witnessing the absolute failure of Spare and +1 to produce content for Spotify and Netflix? Did MI6 make that happen, too, along with a car crash in Paris?

They have just thrown Kate under the bus. What makes you think they didn't with Harry?