Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
So in the future if Israel is overrun. Israeli jews are forced in to the Gaza and treated the same way Palestinians are treat, you will be fine with it? |
In the early 2000s Jihadists certainly did exist in the West Bank suicide bombers (male and female ones) which is why Israel freaked out and gave them Gaza. It’s actually when West Bank became peaceful and stopped violence that guess what? Israeli settlers and IdF moved in and started killing them more frequently. Israel never rewarded them for being peaceful . Some West Bank residents who hate Hamas even decided to ask Israel for permission to permanently relocate to Gaza to be safe. Go figure. What message does that show Palestinians if now plenty of West Bank people who were jailed get released because of Hamas? The peaceful resistance gave them nothing with Israel . Israel should’ve gave them more benefits for being peaceful but they did the opposite in fact. Rewarding and allowing Hamas to become millionaires and build underground cities. How could concrete come into Gaza if there’s an air, land, and sea blockade and the tunnels to Egypt werent built yet? Simple. They bought the concrete from Israeli companies with Qatari cash. Netanyahu the bribe taker is notorious for this kind of wheel and dealing and he should be in jail if Israel does the right thing. He made the country so unsafe |
Actually, my sympathies are, on balance, with Israel because I believe that Palestinians created the current situation. Their refusal to honor the initial 2 state solution and subsequent 80 years of terrorism is, in my view, the primary cause of the current conflict and misery. So this is not a question of "emotional attachment" for me--it's a question of who bears responsibility. It's also a case of believing that terror attacks targeted against civilians are unjust, regardless of circumstance. |
OMFG, you're being ridiculously obtuse and pedantic. When did German civilian casualties commence? (Hint, not 1939). What percentage of the German civilian population was under the age of 18? Apply this ratio to the total casualties over the appropriate period and you get...more than 1,000. Or, if you're feeling lazy, simply consider Hiroshima/Nagasaki. |
| But there hasn't been 80 years of terrorism, and the reason for Nakba wasn't terrorism, it was because the early Zionists didn't believe the Jewish state was possible with a large Arab minority within it. It wasn't terrorism that drove Israel to steal land. It was their desire to have more land. |
The bolded is pretty much my view. F*ck Bibi and F*ck the Palestinian terrorist sympathizers. |
| Slowly but surely, Hamas is being defeated. This may annoy much of the “youth vote” in the US, as well as many academics, but there it is. |
Serious question. You don’t think what Israel has done to them for 80 years constitutes terrorism? They don’t have an Iron Dome, have higher death counts -namely children, women, and elderly as homes get bombed. Is this not terrorism? They even crossed state borders to go to Lebanon to do a massacre with a Lebanese Christian paramilitary . Massacres Israeli soldiers still have nightmares about . Three of the Hamas founders come from the Shatila Lebanese refugee camp-the same massacre where a pregnant Palestinian woman’s baby was cut out of her stomach and the Israeli soldiers betted on if it were a boy or a girl (an IDF soldier’s words-not a Palestinians words). It’s something when you have even Israeli ex soldiers and Holocaust survivors saying what their country is doing is wrong. |
But what is the IDF creating to replace Hamas? There will be some very angry, traumatized, resentful young men and women growing up in Gaze over the next generation. |
Civil rights movement didn’t happen with terrorism. Neither did suffrage, or birth control or abortion. It occurred with peaceful activism and education and tolerance. You are falling over yourself to defend terrorism. And separately, the West Bank is not relevant to what’s happening in Gaza with Hamas, and your effort to conflate the two is an attempt to deflect from Hamas, an entity that is indefensible. |
This is true. That is why bibi has to go, settlers need to be reigned in, and there needs to be a two state solution. But that’s where I draw the line. No river to the sea bullish-t for me. And Israel has a right to defend itself, making a neighboring and radicalized Palestinian state very complicated, a truth and logistics of which the far left refuses to acknowledge. |
Serious answer: I agree that many of Israel's actions, especially over the last 20 years, have been terrible. That said, homes getting bombed, while horrible and sometimes criminal, is IMO a lesser evil than terrorism. As for the war crimes committed by Israeli forces, I deplore them 100%. If I had to summarize, I'd say this: 1. The Palestinians are largely responsible for starting/creating the conflict by rejecting UN resolution 181. 2. Israelis have behaved barbarously and criminally at times. 3. Most Palestinians' ultimate goal is the elimination of Israel and they are willing to continue to use terror and conflict as means to achieving this goal. 4. The Palestinians have turned down multiple offers of peace that, while imperfect, presented far better options than ongoing terror and conflict. 5. The current Israeli government and the Israeli right has no interest in peace with the Palestinians and is deliberately undermining the possibility of peace. They are willing to commit ethnic cleansing in order to expand Israel and are currently doing so in the West Bank (albeit in slow motion) and possibly Gaza (tbd). 6. My conclusion: both sides bear tremendous moral responsibility; the Palestinians had numerous chances to avoid all of this and failed to do so, b/c of #4. |
In other words, you don't want Israel to be accountable for the evils it perpetrates in West Bank. Yah okay. Predictable. Last time Palestinians had peaceful demonstrations, they got tear gassed, thrown in prison, or had their kneecaps shot. Hella recommendation. |
In other words, this thread is called “the war in Gaza,” and not “settlements in the West Bank.” Maybe try developing a coherent and applicable argument for your POV. |
LOL whereas Israel simply HAD to go and settle the West Bank? Simply HAD to practice administrative detention? Simply HAD to unleash crazy violent settlers? |