APS - Elementary school -who is opting for virtual in 2021/22

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I'm not even sure what they're advocating for anymore. If there's so much demand that 3 feet isn't viable anymore in in person education, wtf is APS supposed to do? I don't want my child in an office building, sorry. Or outside all day long.


Interestingly, a lot of people trashed one of the SB candidates a few weeks ago for playing around with this very idea - what happens if we can't fit everyone back even at 3ft. They mocked her drawings, which I don't think were mean to be totally done to scale but to point out potential problems. There's a 40-something page DCUM thread entitled Shifts in the Fall? based on exactly that, her contemplating what options exist if it becomes impossible to get every single child in a classroom 5 days per week all at the same time. Duran's message shows that APS staff are similarly thinking about options.

There are plenty, notably the APE crowd and their candidate, who continue to say 5 days per week as in the old days starting immediately. They're already screaming objections that the idea even needs to be considered. Maybe it will end up being unnecessary, but that's what contingency planning is for. We know APS did a horrible job last spring, and just possibly they are trying to do a better job under Duran this spring in preparation for fall.



I saw that thread. It devolved into APE vs SR ridiculousness.

I’m confident that we can safely open five days a week in the fall, with whatever mitigation measures needed by then. Interestingly, it’s the high schoolers who we don’t have to worry about next year. Hopefully enough of them will be vaxxed by then. Hoping that ms and es kids will start getting shots sooner rather than later.

The hysteria on both sides will hopefully have a summer to simmer down.



Ironically, the fact that lower ed won't be vaccinated by the fall, but, will be in person only supports the notion that they might as well go forward with additional days now. There will not be a substantive material change in their status or risk exposure between now and then.


I don't agree with this at all. It completely ignores all the concerns from the latina community we have heard already. And transmission rates should be lower in the fall than they are right now AND more parents and the families that kids live with should be fully vaxed by then, making the possiblity that kids bringing it home to them won't actually kill their families.


Enough with the propping up one demographic to try and make a point.

1. No one is saying to take away virtual, but, add additional days now for lower ed of whom many desperately want/need it.
2. I know Latino families in APS who desperately want additional days and would instantly move to 5 days because it is hard for them to juggle all of the demands of work and childcare with hybrid and virtual has not worked well for their children.

So, chupa en eso.


1. Since you would be forcing some people who can't swing 4 days of dealing with childcare and pickup at 3pm to move from 2 day to virtual, forcing 4 days makes it worse for some.
2. Some can and some can not! The people who did speak at the meeting said leave things the way they are now.

You have lost this argument but won the fall. Pick up the pieces of your shattered life and move on.
Anonymous
https://www.chop.edu/news/chop-researchers-find-elevated-biomarker-related-blood-vessel-damage-all-children-sars-cov-2

In every child regardless of severity, including asymptomatic children.
Anonymous
I'm in SR. I agree that ventilation lady seems be losing her sh*t over on AEM and that's unfortunate. My kids are in hybrid and will be FT in person next year. I am fine staying with hybrid as is for the rest of the school year and get back to (mostly) normal next school year. One thing that still concerns me, though, is when a kid or class has to quarantine and they basically just stay home for 2 weeks. That seems unworkable especially if it happens frequently.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://www.chop.edu/news/chop-researchers-find-elevated-biomarker-related-blood-vessel-damage-all-children-sars-cov-2

In every child regardless of severity, including asymptomatic children.


right an elevated bio-marker. biomarker: a measurable substance in an organism whose presence is indicative of some phenomenon such as disease, infection, or environmental exposure.

This is hardly suggestive that we need to be concerned about asymptomatic cases of COVID.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.chop.edu/news/chop-researchers-find-elevated-biomarker-related-blood-vessel-damage-all-children-sars-cov-2

In every child regardless of severity, including asymptomatic children.


right an elevated bio-marker. biomarker: a measurable substance in an organism whose presence is indicative of some phenomenon such as disease, infection, or environmental exposure.

This is hardly suggestive that we need to be concerned about asymptomatic cases of COVID.


Also the population studied was 50 pediatric patients hospitalized at CHOP with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection between April and July 2020. Of those 50 patients, 21 had minimal COVID-19, 11 had severe COVID-19, and 18 were diagnosed with MIS-C. Not sure why the 21 with minimal Covid 19 were hospitalized but it’s probably safe to assume they had some serious issue to be hospitalized.
Anonymous
VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?

I think she needs help. So does EHN and a few other frequent posters.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?

I think she needs help. So does EHN and a few other frequent posters.


Umm, 90% of AEM would fall under the category of needing help. It's pure entertainment at this point.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?

I think she needs help. So does EHN and a few other frequent posters.


Umm, 90% of AEM would fall under the category of needing help. It's pure entertainment at this point.


Are you talking about DCUM?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?

I think she needs help. So does EHN and a few other frequent posters.


EHN doesn't even really know what she's fighting for anymore. She just wants to win.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?

I think she needs help. So does EHN and a few other frequent posters.


EHN doesn't even really know what she's fighting for anymore. She just wants to win.


Is there really a point to MT running anymore? There aren't going to be more days this school year. It's almost May FFS. APE is getting what they want for the fall. What else she got?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?

I think she needs help. So does EHN and a few other frequent posters.


EHN doesn't even really know what she's fighting for anymore. She just wants to win.


Is there really a point to MT running anymore? There aren't going to be more days this school year. It's almost May FFS. APE is getting what they want for the fall. What else she got?


I’ll vote for her just because I remember how Kadera handled the school moves. I suspect I’m not the only one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?

I think she needs help. So does EHN and a few other frequent posters.


EHN doesn't even really know what she's fighting for anymore. She just wants to win.


Is there really a point to MT running anymore? There aren't going to be more days this school year. It's almost May FFS. APE is getting what they want for the fall. What else she got?


I’ll vote for her just because I remember how Kadera handled the school moves. I suspect I’m not the only one.


What happened?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?


This is truly bonkers. What if her kid gets the placebo???? Just stay in virtual!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:VL has lost it, now she says she's looking for a vaccine trial for her child. Now? This is what pushed her to do that?


This is truly bonkers. What if her kid gets the placebo???? Just stay in virtual!


Actually, those in the placebo trial get the vaccine after the trial is over. Months before everyone else. I signed my kid up too, but I’m sure there’s a lot of people in line, so not holding my breath.
post reply Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Message Quick Reply
Go to: