Barr personally asked foreign intelligence officials to aid inquiry into US CIA, FBI officials

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prosecutor John Durham, appointed 5 months ago to investigate the origins of the Russia probe, has not requested interviews with any of the FBI or DOJ officials who were involved in opening it. So what exactly are Durham and Barr looking at?
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2019/10/05/justice-department-russia-probe-028545?__twitter_impression=true

An actual witch hunt. Fortunately, both the Aussies and Italians told them where to stick it. Not sure if the UK will do the same, we'll see. If they want the "dirt" from Mifsud, they should go to Moscow.

According to the massively sourced Post article on Trump’s calls with foreign leaders, he told May that he didn’t believe the UK intelligence that Putin has the Skripals poisoned. So hopefully they’re skeptical of every damn thing he says.

With Boris in charge at the moment, it is hard to say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

Ask Ivanka. She has roundtable sessions with business leaders all the time when she isn't even qualified to hold their jockstraps. Maybe she can tell you what the secret is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

Hunter Biden did not get a $1.5 billion contract in China. That is false no matter how many times Trump repeats it. Please learn the FACTS. Thank you.

The origin of the $1.5 billion figure cited by Mr. Trump about Hunter Biden’s business in China is unclear, but the Journal in July 2014 quoted BHR Partners executives as saying the firm was trying to raise that much money to invest outside China. The plan, they said, aimed to take advantage of a new free-trade zone in Shanghai that Chinese authorities were promoting as a streamlined route to make acquisitions abroad for companies registered there, such as BHR Partners.

The Journal article was cited as the only source for the $1.5 billion figure when it appeared in a book published last year that is critical of Mr. Biden’s business activities, and which has been praised by Mr. Trump. “Secret Empires,” by Peter Schweizer, says that after Hunter Biden’s flight to Beijing aboard Air Force Two, “Hunter’s firm would seal a highly unusual $1.5 billion deal with funding from the Chinese government.”

BHR Partners hasn’t said if it met its fundraising target, but a former employee said it was never more than a long-term goal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

Hunter Biden did not get a $1.5 billion contract in China. That is false no matter how many times Trump repeats it. Please learn the FACTS. Thank you.

The origin of the $1.5 billion figure cited by Mr. Trump about Hunter Biden’s business in China is unclear, but the Journal in July 2014 quoted BHR Partners executives as saying the firm was trying to raise that much money to invest outside China. The plan, they said, aimed to take advantage of a new free-trade zone in Shanghai that Chinese authorities were promoting as a streamlined route to make acquisitions abroad for companies registered there, such as BHR Partners.

The Journal article was cited as the only source for the $1.5 billion figure when it appeared in a book published last year that is critical of Mr. Biden’s business activities, and which has been praised by Mr. Trump. “Secret Empires,” by Peter Schweizer, says that after Hunter Biden’s flight to Beijing aboard Air Force Two, “Hunter’s firm would seal a highly unusual $1.5 billion deal with funding from the Chinese government.”

BHR Partners hasn’t said if it met its fundraising target, but a former employee said it was never more than a long-term goal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403

Even Politifact says it is unconfirmed. Which means it could be true. We don't know. Biden's folks dispute it. So, perhaps an investigation is in order.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/oct/02/donald-trumps-accusations-about-hunter-biden-and-c/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

Hunter Biden did not get a $1.5 billion contract in China. That is false no matter how many times Trump repeats it. Please learn the FACTS. Thank you.

The origin of the $1.5 billion figure cited by Mr. Trump about Hunter Biden’s business in China is unclear, but the Journal in July 2014 quoted BHR Partners executives as saying the firm was trying to raise that much money to invest outside China. The plan, they said, aimed to take advantage of a new free-trade zone in Shanghai that Chinese authorities were promoting as a streamlined route to make acquisitions abroad for companies registered there, such as BHR Partners.

The Journal article was cited as the only source for the $1.5 billion figure when it appeared in a book published last year that is critical of Mr. Biden’s business activities, and which has been praised by Mr. Trump. “Secret Empires,” by Peter Schweizer, says that after Hunter Biden’s flight to Beijing aboard Air Force Two, “Hunter’s firm would seal a highly unusual $1.5 billion deal with funding from the Chinese government.”

BHR Partners hasn’t said if it met its fundraising target, but a former employee said it was never more than a long-term goal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403

Even Politifact says it is unconfirmed. Which means it could be true. We don't know. Biden's folks dispute it. So, perhaps an investigation is in order.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/oct/02/donald-trumps-accusations-about-hunter-biden-and-c/

Lies told in a book by RWNJ Peter Schweizer who is a right wing nut job are not sufficient basis for an investigation of anybody.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

Really? do you really care? Really? If you care so much then why aren't you asking about foreign govts, our govt, businesses booking trump hotels? Why don't you ask about why people who were mar a lago members are now suddenly qualified for govt positions?

I find your calls for an "investigation" to be disingenuous. You don't care about corruption or nepotism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

Hunter Biden did not get a $1.5 billion contract in China. That is false no matter how many times Trump repeats it. Please learn the FACTS. Thank you.

The origin of the $1.5 billion figure cited by Mr. Trump about Hunter Biden’s business in China is unclear, but the Journal in July 2014 quoted BHR Partners executives as saying the firm was trying to raise that much money to invest outside China. The plan, they said, aimed to take advantage of a new free-trade zone in Shanghai that Chinese authorities were promoting as a streamlined route to make acquisitions abroad for companies registered there, such as BHR Partners.

The Journal article was cited as the only source for the $1.5 billion figure when it appeared in a book published last year that is critical of Mr. Biden’s business activities, and which has been praised by Mr. Trump. “Secret Empires,” by Peter Schweizer, says that after Hunter Biden’s flight to Beijing aboard Air Force Two, “Hunter’s firm would seal a highly unusual $1.5 billion deal with funding from the Chinese government.”

BHR Partners hasn’t said if it met its fundraising target, but a former employee said it was never more than a long-term goal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403

Even Politifact says it is unconfirmed. Which means it could be true. We don't know. Biden's folks dispute it. So, perhaps an investigation is in order.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/oct/02/donald-trumps-accusations-about-hunter-biden-and-c/

Lies told in a book by RWNJ Peter Schweizer who is a right wing nut job are not sufficient basis for an investigation of anybody.

Sure they aren't.
After that, we can move on to why the donations to the Clinton Foundation precipitously dropped when she lost the election.

But not before we investigate this mystery:

Politico’s investigation nearly three years ago found that:

A Ukrainian-American operative consulting for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) met with top officials in Ukraine's U.S. embassy to publicize ties between Trump, his top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia. (It worked.)
Ukrainian officials tried to help Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office.
Ukrainian officials “disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election.”
Ukrainian officials helped Clinton allies dig up damaging information on Trump and his advisers.
“The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to … Russia.”

https://thehill.com/opinion/international/462709-ukraine-scandal-shows-that-foreign-influence-is-a-bipartisan-affair
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

[Anonymous]

#ArmsforDirt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

Well the answer to a. is obvious but it isn't remotely illegal unless you also have a problem with how George W. Bush got all.of his jobs and also many, many thousands of others going back to John Quincy Adams.

[Anonymous]

Also George H. Bush. After losing two senate races, he "failed up" and got appointments thanks to republican presidents. That's how he ended up in China as a liaison from 74-75.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

LOL, so that's where you're getting the "make shit up" accusation? First, we've been told there was an investigation and it turned up nothing on Hunter. So was there not an investigation? Trump saying, "look into what actually happened with Burisma and Hunter Biden" means "make some shit up?" Please.

Of course it does! How do you think Trump would react if Ukraine got back to him with the finding that Biden was clean as a whistle? They know exactly what they’re expected to do for their money. People like you think that you’re patriots for trusting the President, but you are really ignorant fools who are undermining our country.

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

Hunter Biden did not get a $1.5 billion contract in China. That is false no matter how many times Trump repeats it. Please learn the FACTS. Thank you.

The origin of the $1.5 billion figure cited by Mr. Trump about Hunter Biden’s business in China is unclear, but the Journal in July 2014 quoted BHR Partners executives as saying the firm was trying to raise that much money to invest outside China. The plan, they said, aimed to take advantage of a new free-trade zone in Shanghai that Chinese authorities were promoting as a streamlined route to make acquisitions abroad for companies registered there, such as BHR Partners.

The Journal article was cited as the only source for the $1.5 billion figure when it appeared in a book published last year that is critical of Mr. Biden’s business activities, and which has been praised by Mr. Trump. “Secret Empires,” by Peter Schweizer, says that after Hunter Biden’s flight to Beijing aboard Air Force Two, “Hunter’s firm would seal a highly unusual $1.5 billion deal with funding from the Chinese government.”

BHR Partners hasn’t said if it met its fundraising target, but a former employee said it was never more than a long-term goal.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-we-know-about-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-china-11570181403

Even Politifact says it is unconfirmed. Which means it could be true. We don't know. Biden's folks dispute it. So, perhaps an investigation is in order.

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2019/oct/02/donald-trumps-accusations-about-hunter-biden-and-c/

Do you people have to lie about EVERYTHING? Politifact did NOT say the accusation is ‘unconfirmed’. And the article basically shoots down the idea that it’s true. And if the accusation was started by Peter Schweizer (author of the widely disparaged book Clinton Cash), then it’s almost definitely untrue. More to the point, however, NONE OF THIS MATTERS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People, this was put out there to move your interest away from the real problem: Trump threatening to withhold military aid unless Ukraine helped him make dirt about his political opponent -- bad conduct.

All of that is unrelated to the Justice department conspiracy-theory probe into the origins of Russiagate. That investigation may be stupid and waste of money, but it probably isn't illegal.

Keep your eye on the ball and don't let them whip you up about the side-show. They really, really want to roll Ukraine into that, and it isn't the same thing at all.

Actually, that thing about the "dirt" was entirely fabricated by Adam Schiff in his opening statement to DNI Maguire's testimony. Later on during the hearing, Schiff claimed he wasn't "lying," it was simply his version of a "parody."

Yet the MSM are using Schiff's "lie/parody" of "digging up dirt" supposedly requested by Trump as the prevailing meme. And so are you.

Parodies are for clowns. Schiff is a clown. Are you?

And, let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi then went on 60 Minutes and accused Trump of trying to get Ukraine to "create" information.

It is no surprise that the Democrats are making statements that simply are not true.

Given that there was no investigation that involved Hunter Biden and no evidence of any wrongdoing, the only way there was going to be "dirt" is if it were manufactured.

If there was no investigation of Hunter Biden, then how could Joe Biden keep saying the accusations against his son have been "debunked"? Seems to me like you can't have a conclusion without having the investigation first. So let's have at it.

You also haven't been investigated for illegal behavior, have you? Let's have at it.

In the case of Hunter Biden, though, it's not quite so easy. Since we want another country to investigate him for ... something. And they have said they won't, because there's no reason to. So now what?

Then you lose a piece of your country and we send a cut up map of Ukraine to Australia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Perhaps Biden (Joe) is clean as a whistle. Perhaps Hunter is clean as a whistle.

Meanwhile, I would like to know:
a. How a person with no expertise in gas/energy gets a more than $50,000/month compensation by serving on a board overseeing something he knows nothing about in a foreign country.
b. How a person can be given a $ 1.5 BILLION contract with a bank in China just two short weeks after returning from China on AF2 with dad who just happens to be VP.

How does Jared get a billion dollars from Qatar to bail out 666 Park Avenue right when UAE and KSA were threatening war?
How do Eric and Junior rake in hundreds of millions for doing nothing?
How does Ivanka get chinese trademarks and an $82M payout last year for being a white house advisor?

These are real things. I am not saying Hunter is necessarily clean, but how about we deal with the present situation in total. Or how about we pass an ethics package that defines Emoluments, bans any relative from working in the government (this includes Barr's daughter and son in law) and closes all of the legal ambiguities that Trump has shattered?