Updates on LAMB at Kingsbury?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I would be fully in favor of this solution but that’s not even on the table.

It could be.

Kingsbury is going to sell to whomever it gets the most money from - it has to, in order to finance a move and continue operations.

If not LAMB, then any entity that fits the ZONING, could buy it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

Get over yourself. LAMB will be there whether you like it or not. What you’re doing is causing a school to spend money on lawyers instead of books. You’re taking resources directly away from CHILDREN, a good number of whom are from vulnerable populations. And for what? To delay a slight increase in traffic for a year? You should be ashamed of yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

Get over yourself. LAMB will be there whether you like it or not. What you’re doing is causing a school to spend money on lawyers instead of books. You’re taking resources directly away from CHILDREN, a good number of whom are from vulnerable populations. And for what? To delay a slight increase in traffic for a year? You should be ashamed of yourself.

If you really want to look at who’s stealing money from children then you should look at Building Hope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

Get over yourself. LAMB will be there whether you like it or not. What you’re doing is causing a school to spend money on lawyers instead of books. You’re taking resources directly away from CHILDREN, a good number of whom are from vulnerable populations. And for what? To delay a slight increase in traffic for a year? You should be ashamed of yourself.

You would have a point except that lamb is doing exactly nothing for the vulnerable population they serve who will be displaced by kingsbury. Nothing. So don’t act like the Neighbors are the only bad guys out there.

- definitely will be forced to switch schools once Kingsbury happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

Get over yourself. LAMB will be there whether you like it or not. What you’re doing is causing a school to spend money on lawyers instead of books. You’re taking resources directly away from CHILDREN, a good number of whom are from vulnerable populations. And for what? To delay a slight increase in traffic for a year? You should be ashamed of yourself.

You would have a point except that lamb is doing exactly nothing for the vulnerable population they serve who will be displaced by kingsbury. Nothing. So don’t act like the Neighbors are the only bad guys out there.

- definitely will be forced to switch schools once Kingsbury happens.

We don’t know where LAMB will land on that issue because they’ve never gotten close enough to moving for decisions to be made.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

Get over yourself. LAMB will be there whether you like it or not. What you’re doing is causing a school to spend money on lawyers instead of books. You’re taking resources directly away from CHILDREN, a good number of whom are from vulnerable populations. And for what? To delay a slight increase in traffic for a year? You should be ashamed of yourself.

You would have a point except that lamb is doing exactly nothing for the vulnerable population they serve who will be displaced by kingsbury. Nothing. So don’t act like the Neighbors are the only bad guys out there.

- definitely will be forced to switch schools once Kingsbury happens.

We don’t know where LAMB will land on that issue because they’ve never gotten close enough to moving for decisions to be made.

I’m sorry but that is also a lie. In all the paperwork, lamb promised not to have buses, and instead that it would “encourage” carpools.

There are and never have been any plan or impact study on the lamb population. Many of us, including myself, were told that lamb would not be leaving South Dakota, which served grades pk3-5th. I totally understand that charters can move, but we were told that this would not happen.

The neighbors only have to see how lamb has treated us to know lamb will not follow through on their promises.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I would be fully in favor of this solution but that’s not even on the table.

Or they could find someone like the organization who was bidding against Kingsbury when they bought the building, and end up with a giant half way house for offenders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

Get over yourself. LAMB will be there whether you like it or not. What you’re doing is causing a school to spend money on lawyers instead of books. You’re taking resources directly away from CHILDREN, a good number of whom are from vulnerable populations. And for what? To delay a slight increase in traffic for a year? You should be ashamed of yourself.

You would have a point except that lamb is doing exactly nothing for the vulnerable population they serve who will be displaced by kingsbury. Nothing. So don’t act like the Neighbors are the only bad guys out there.

- definitely will be forced to switch schools once Kingsbury happens.

We don’t know where LAMB will land on that issue because they’ve never gotten close enough to moving for decisions to be made.

I’m sorry but that is also a lie. In all the paperwork, lamb promised not to have buses, and instead that it would “encourage” carpools.

There are and never have been any plan or impact study on the lamb population. Many of us, including myself, were told that lamb would not be leaving South Dakota, which served grades pk3-5th. I totally understand that charters can move, but we were told that this would not happen.

The neighbors only have to see how lamb has treated us to know lamb will not follow through on their promises.

That all happened under Diane. We have no idea how the current administration and the new Board will handle the issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

Get over yourself. LAMB will be there whether you like it or not. What you’re doing is causing a school to spend money on lawyers instead of books. You’re taking resources directly away from CHILDREN, a good number of whom are from vulnerable populations. And for what? To delay a slight increase in traffic for a year? You should be ashamed of yourself.

You would have a point except that lamb is doing exactly nothing for the vulnerable population they serve who will be displaced by kingsbury. Nothing. So don’t act like the Neighbors are the only bad guys out there.

- definitely will be forced to switch schools once Kingsbury happens.

We don’t know where LAMB will land on that issue because they’ve never gotten close enough to moving for decisions to be made.

I’m sorry but that is also a lie. In all the paperwork, lamb promised not to have buses, and instead that it would “encourage” carpools.

There are and never have been any plan or impact study on the lamb population. Many of us, including myself, were told that lamb would not be leaving South Dakota, which served grades pk3-5th. I totally understand that charters can move, but we were told that this would not happen.

The neighbors only have to see how lamb has treated us to know lamb will not follow through on their promises.

That all happened under Diane. We have no idea how the current administration and the new Board will handle the issue.

Just so everyone is clear- does that mean all the concessions lamb has put forward are also possibly going to be rolled back too? Or are you just lying to the people being displaced by the kingsbury move?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I would be fully in favor of this solution but that’s not even on the table.

Or they could find someone like the organization who was bidding against Kingsbury when they bought the building, and end up with a giant half way house for offenders.

My preference was the Scientologists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I would be fully in favor of this solution but that’s not even on the table.

Or they could find someone like the organization who was bidding against Kingsbury when they bought the building, and end up with a giant half way house for offenders.

Pretty clear to me that it would be a developer who would buy it and create some townhouses. With two car garages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The city will not decline if LAMB does not move into the Kingsbury building.

Honestly given the demographics of Ward 4 I think it should be returned to its original mission and made into a home for low-income seniors.

I'm saying, if you want to avoid change you should try living in a place that isn't growing.

I’m saying, if you want to build whatever you want you should try living in a place that doesn’t have zoning laws.

Get over yourself. LAMB will be there whether you like it or not. What you’re doing is causing a school to spend money on lawyers instead of books. You’re taking resources directly away from CHILDREN, a good number of whom are from vulnerable populations. And for what? To delay a slight increase in traffic for a year? You should be ashamed of yourself.

You would have a point except that lamb is doing exactly nothing for the vulnerable population they serve who will be displaced by kingsbury. Nothing. So don’t act like the Neighbors are the only bad guys out there.

- definitely will be forced to switch schools once Kingsbury happens.

We don’t know where LAMB will land on that issue because they’ve never gotten close enough to moving for decisions to be made.

I’m sorry but that is also a lie. In all the paperwork, lamb promised not to have buses, and instead that it would “encourage” carpools.

There are and never have been any plan or impact study on the lamb population. Many of us, including myself, were told that lamb would not be leaving South Dakota, which served grades pk3-5th. I totally understand that charters can move, but we were told that this would not happen.

The neighbors only have to see how lamb has treated us to know lamb will not follow through on their promises.

That all happened under Diane. We have no idea how the current administration and the new Board will handle the issue.

Just so everyone is clear- does that mean all the concessions lamb has put forward are also possibly going to be rolled back too? Or are you just lying to the people being displaced by the kingsbury move?

There were never any enforceable concessions. Were you born yesterday

[Anonymous]

And clearly lamb has zero intention of abiding by any of them.