Breaking: Cohen exploring possible plea deal to be reached as early as today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter reporting that Cohen just said in court under oath that Trump directed him to commit a Federal crime.

Twitter is incorrect. What Federal crime? Why hasn't Trump been arrested?

1. Federal Campaign finance laws? Using campaign money or in kind donations to pay off stormy

2. Current “policy” that sitting presidents can’t be indicted, and this also *just* happened.

Plea didn't say Trump used campaign money

What else could the campaign finance violation be?

It was worded in a squirrelly manner. There was no judge nor jury. It's words, nothing else.

What are you even talking about? Yes, when someone pleads guilty, they don't need a trial by judge or jury. You go straight to sentencing.

He pled to lesser charges. Now do you think that would have been allowed if they had something huge on Trump? No. You are allowed to influence a campaign. You are not allowed to break the law. Prove Trump broke the law please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter reporting that Cohen just said in court under oath that Trump directed him to commit a Federal crime.

Twitter is incorrect. What Federal crime? Why hasn't Trump been arrested?

1. Federal Campaign finance laws? Using campaign money or in kind donations to pay off stormy

2. Current “policy” that sitting presidents can’t be indicted, and this also *just* happened.

Plea didn't say Trump used campaign money

What else could the campaign finance violation be?

It was worded in a squirrelly manner. There was no judge nor jury. It's words, nothing else.

What are you even talking about? Yes, when someone pleads guilty, they don't need a trial by judge or jury. You go straight to sentencing.

He pled to lesser charges. Now do you think that would have been allowed if they had something huge on Trump? No. You are allowed to influence a campaign. You are not allowed to break the law. Prove Trump broke the law please.

Oh, my God. You are not allowed to spend money to "influence a campaign," as you so politely refer to the porn star payoff, without reporting it as a campaign expense!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how do we prove Trump ordered Cohen to pay them off with campaign funds? I assume Cohen's word is not enough to impeach a president.

My money’s on that somebody has tapes. Mueller et al wouldn’t deal if they felt it was only his word, in my opinion.

Sure he would! Goal is to have Dems win the house and THEN file for impeachment. This creates a narrative.

You do know that mueller is a Republican? I hate to bring it up because it should not matter. Just two years ago of course it would not matter because back then people in positions of power did not casually and forcefully impugn the motivations of public servants who have devoted their careers to the good of the country and of all Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter reporting that Cohen just said in court under oath that Trump directed him to commit a Federal crime.

Twitter is incorrect. What Federal crime? Why hasn't Trump been arrested?

1. Federal Campaign finance laws? Using campaign money or in kind donations to pay off stormy

2. Current “policy” that sitting presidents can’t be indicted, and this also *just* happened.

Plea didn't say Trump used campaign money

What else could the campaign finance violation be?

It was worded in a squirrelly manner. There was no judge nor jury. It's words, nothing else.

What are you even talking about? Yes, when someone pleads guilty, they don't need a trial by judge or jury. You go straight to sentencing.

He pled to lesser charges. Now do you think that would have been allowed if they had something huge on Trump? No. You are allowed to influence a campaign. You are not allowed to break the law. Prove Trump broke the law please.

Cohen said so in the plea. That’s why it’s so important. Trump ordered Cohen to break the law. And Trump broke the law to get elected. It’s really looking bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how do we prove Trump ordered Cohen to pay them off with campaign funds? I assume Cohen's word is not enough to impeach a president.

Maybe Cohen has tapes, notes, or a corroborating witness. BTW, there is plenty to impeach Trump with, if Congress were willing.

I can almost guarantee he has tapes of him ordering it. Obviously he knew trump would throw him under the bus, hence why he recorded the tape we already heard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is INSANE. POTUS DIRECTLY implicated in Cohen pleas.

I know but are we really surprised ? Maga denizens on the verge of losing it all lol

Where are they? They’re always saying, “where’s the proof? Where’s the proof? Trump’s not implicated!’”

Now he is.

Now they'll do their classic spin where even if there is proof, it doesn't matter because the crimes are not that bad and irrelveant. A "nothingburger" if you will.

The real question is can you (a) believe Cohen and (b) if he's 'flipping' to protect his family, can you believe what he says, given his family has been clearly threatened?

Oh, it's so hard for you Trumpists when justice is done.

I don't give a crab about Trump. He goes and I'm happy with the VP. What I DO care about is this rampant corruption in the DOJ and the FBI and down the line.

Can you enlighten us with information about the corruption you discovered in DOJ and FBI? How did you find out about it?

From hannity, tucker c and Jeanine pirro of course !! And talk radio and breitbart

Actually, from the emails and texts of the individuals themselves.

Did they let you read their emails?

[Anonymous]

It’s not up to us to prove Trump directed this action (payoff) and therefore committed a crime. That will be up to prosecutors to show and then a grand jury to decide, unless enough people agree he can’t be indicted as a sitting president or unless he pleads (lol).

The point is, Cohen stated that he was directed by a candidate to do the payoff so unflattering information wouldn’t come to light, that it was done with the principal purpose of influencing the election, and it was done knowing it was wrong illegal.

[Anonymous]

The Worst Hour of Trump’s Presidency

Two massive clouds that have been hanging over Donald Trump's presidency for months broke open almost simultaneously on Tuesday afternoon -- and poured rain all over the President.

Between 4 p.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern time, two narratives -- both disastrously bad for Trump -- emerged:
1. Paul Manafort, the man who spent five critical months leading Trump's campaign in 2016, was found guilty of eight financial crimes. On the 10 other charges brought against Manafort, the jury couldn't reach a unanimous conclusion and the presiding judge declared a mistrial on those counts.
2. Longtime Trump personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen agreed to a plea deal with the Southern District of New York in which he admitted guilt on eight charges and acknowledged that he had discussed or made hush payments to two women alleging affairs with Trump in order to keep damaging information from becoming public, at the direction of and in coordination with a candidate for federal office. That candidate, although Cohen didn't name him, is obviously Donald Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter reporting that Cohen just said in court under oath that Trump directed him to commit a Federal crime.

Twitter is incorrect. What Federal crime? Why hasn't Trump been arrested?

1. Federal Campaign finance laws? Using campaign money or in kind donations to pay off stormy

2. Current “policy” that sitting presidents can’t be indicted, and this also *just* happened.

Plea didn't say Trump used campaign money

What else could the campaign finance violation be?

It was worded in a squirrelly manner. There was no judge nor jury. It's words, nothing else.

What are you even talking about? Yes, when someone pleads guilty, they don't need a trial by judge or jury. You go straight to sentencing.

He pled to lesser charges. Now do you think that would have been allowed if they had something huge on Trump? No. You are allowed to influence a campaign. You are not allowed to break the law. Prove Trump broke the law please.

WTF are you blathering on about? Nothing in Cohens plea deal prevents Mueller from bringing additional charges— larger or smaller— at any time he damn well pleases.

What do you mean by “lesser charges”? Lesser than homicide but greater than speeding?

Please, leave the law to lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Trump could literally shoot someone on 5th Avenue and the apologists in the forum would excuse it.

Sad.

[Anonymous]

Illegitimate president, full stop.

There should be no more judicial hearings until the Trump corruption issues are resolved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Illegitimate president, full stop.

There should be no more judicial hearings until the Trump corruption issues are resolved.

I’ll be calling my senators tomorrow to say just that.

[Anonymous]

I’ll miss Barry Zuckerkorn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is INSANE. POTUS DIRECTLY implicated in Cohen pleas.

I know but are we really surprised ? Maga denizens on the verge of losing it all lol

Where are they? They’re always saying, “where’s the proof? Where’s the proof? Trump’s not implicated!’”

Now he is.

Now they'll do their classic spin where even if there is proof, it doesn't matter because the crimes are not that bad and irrelveant. A "nothingburger" if you will.

The real question is can you (a) believe Cohen and (b) if he's 'flipping' to protect his family, can you believe what he says, given his family has been clearly threatened?

Oh, it's so hard for you Trumpists when justice is done.

I don't give a crab about Trump. He goes and I'm happy with the VP. What I DO care about is this rampant corruption in the DOJ and the FBI and down the line.

Can you enlighten us with information about the corruption you discovered in DOJ and FBI? How did you find out about it?

From hannity, tucker c and Jeanine pirro of course !! And talk radio and breitbart

Actually, from the emails and texts of the individuals themselves.

Did they let you read their emails?

Didn't have to get permission. They were delivered by subpoena

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Illegitimate president, full stop.

There should be no more judicial hearings until the Trump corruption issues are resolved.

I’ll be calling my senators tomorrow to say just that.

+1