Brazille considered replacing Clinton with Biden last September

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

If she cared one iota for the party she would be working to encourage the next generation of leaders in the Democratic party but she will not do that because she sees herself as the savior of the party.

I know this comment was about Hillary, but it also applies to Donna. Why the hell is this book coming out the day of an important election, so all of the promotion was going to be the week prior? Just terrible to relitigate all of this shite this week. If she cared about Democrats winning she would not have scheduled it this way.

If your concern is that her revelations are going to hurt your Democratic candidate, then he must really be a bad candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If I had to choose between believing Hillary or Donna, it would be the latter in a heart beat.

Hillary is a pathological liar.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clinton was more qualified than Biden. Would Biden have won? Maybe. Would a man with Clinton’s qualifications have won? Absolutely. I don’t think we understood how sexist this country is. The 2020 dem nominee needs to be a white male if the Dems want to win.

Or an electable woman.

It's not women, it's "that woman."

The funny thing is, "that woman" will never be electable. She will always be "too shill." "too unlikeable.""too ambitious." etc etc etc.


Do you think it only happened to Clinton? LOL forever

No one will EVER come close to Hillary R. Clinton.
No one.

Well her first problem is that she is "Hillary R. Clinton" rather than "Hillary Rodham." She chose to give up her identity to bow to her husband's political amibitions in Arkansas. Weak sister 101.

That was her only chance, and she grabbed it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If she cared one iota for the party she would be working to encourage the next generation of leaders in the Democratic party but she will not do that because she sees herself as the savior of the party.

I know this comment was about Hillary, but it also applies to Donna. Why the hell is this book coming out the day of an important election, so all of the promotion was going to be the week prior? Just terrible to relitigate all of this shite this week. If she cared about Democrats winning she would not have scheduled it this way.

Her timing is actually perfect.

For whom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If she cared one iota for the party she would be working to encourage the next generation of leaders in the Democratic party but she will not do that because she sees herself as the savior of the party.

I know this comment was about Hillary, but it also applies to Donna. Why the hell is this book coming out the day of an important election, so all of the promotion was going to be the week prior? Just terrible to relitigate all of this shite this week. If she cared about Democrats winning she would not have scheduled it this way.

If your concern is that her revelations are going to hurt your Democratic candidate, then he must really be a bad candidate.

There are a lot of elections tomorrow, not just one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If she cared one iota for the party she would be working to encourage the next generation of leaders in the Democratic party but she will not do that because she sees herself as the savior of the party.

I know this comment was about Hillary, but it also applies to Donna. Why the hell is this book coming out the day of an important election, so all of the promotion was going to be the week prior? Just terrible to relitigate all of this shite this week. If she cared about Democrats winning she would not have scheduled it this way.

Her timing is actually perfect.

For whom?

For all of us who want the truth.

[Anonymous]

Do ya’ll know Hillary Clinton isn’t running again? Just checking because you’re fixated on her sweet little self!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do ya’ll know Hillary Clinton isn’t running again? Just checking because you’re fixated on her sweet little self!

You should just ask her.

[Anonymous]

Sorry, she’s not!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do ya’ll know Hillary Clinton isn’t running again? Just checking because you’re fixated on her sweet little self!

You should just ask her.

You may have noticed her being interviewed on national TV like every other day since her book came out. People have asked her. She’s not running. She says in the gd book that she’s not running.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do ya’ll know Hillary Clinton isn’t running again? Just checking because you’re fixated on her sweet little self!

You should just ask her.

You may have noticed her being interviewed on national TV like every other day since her book came out. People have asked her. She’s not running. She says in the gd book that she’s not running.

Oooh, Hillary found Jesus, so no more lies!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, she’s not!

'course she has no history of changing her mind..

[Anonymous]

You want it so bad . . . SO bad . . . But she’s not running!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do ya’ll know Hillary Clinton isn’t running again? Just checking because you’re fixated on her sweet little self!

She's running -- from the law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brazile has been a DNC insider for more than 30 years, so it is ridiculous for her to pretend to be naive about the standard agreements and operating procedures for campaigns raising funds for the party for the general election. The Clinton campaign bailed the DNC out of debt & raised money for the DNC & state parties to get out the vote. Brazile came in and wanted to control the money the Clinton campaign had raised and wanted to use the DNC post to promote herself.

/\/\/\/\/\/\ So says a big Hillary supporter.

Not DSW --- God did she come off as a loon who could do simple math. No wonder the Awan famille took such advantage of her.