Here is a situation I haven't come across before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, not to sockpuppet -- last two posts were from me, 5 person office (we hired someone today)

Hey, congrats on the new coworker! Looks like the economy is finally improving.

Yes, hooray, was-4-person-but-now-is-5-person-office! A ray of sunshine in the middle of an otherwise dismal (but weirdly fascinating) thread.

[Anonymous]

"These go to 11."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. I will only admit to almost eating the whole thing.

This Pacific Westcoaster clearly thinks very highly of herself. Yet she does not understand the difference between identifiable and non-identifiable information. Meanwhile, Jeff is running circles around her, sounding a lot like an information law attorney I know only too well.

The posting of non-identifiable information is not personal. Neither is it a threat, direct or implied. For all of this Banker's tra-la-la and oh-I'm-so articulate, she keeps making mistakes that belie the fact that, whatever fancy degrees she may have or fancy place she works, she's pretty fucking stupid.

The one time there was a highly controversial person on this thread? And everyone knew her name? Jeff did not mention her place of employment, even when he wanted to literally beat her with a stick. That would have been identifiable information. Potentially harmful. But he didn't go there. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

And I agree with the poster who mentioned Morrisette. Everyone thought that song was soooo deep. But it should not have been titled, "Isn't it ironic?" It should have been titled, "Isn't it a bummer?"

I think the Banker is a bummer. A pretty fucking stupid bummer. And I KNOW she's reading this.

Hi, JEFF! LOL

Are you really that stupid? That doesn't even sound like Jeff. It sounds like ME.

You're stupid, stupid!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree with PP. I will only admit to almost eating the whole thing.

This Pacific Westcoaster clearly thinks very highly of herself. Yet she does not understand the difference between identifiable and non-identifiable information. Meanwhile, Jeff is running circles around her, sounding a lot like an information law attorney I know only too well.

The posting of non-identifiable information is not personal. Neither is it a threat, direct or implied. For all of this Banker's tra-la-la and oh-I'm-so articulate, she keeps making mistakes that belie the fact that, whatever fancy degrees she may have or fancy place she works, she's pretty fucking stupid.

The one time there was a highly controversial person on this thread? And everyone knew her name? Jeff did not mention her place of employment, even when he wanted to literally beat her with a stick. That would have been identifiable information. Potentially harmful. But he didn't go there. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

And I agree with the poster who mentioned Morrisette. Everyone thought that song was soooo deep. But it should not have been titled, "Isn't it ironic?" It should have been titled, "Isn't it a bummer?"

I think the Banker is a bummer. A pretty fucking stupid bummer. And I KNOW she's reading this.

Hi, JEFF! LOL

Are you really that stupid? That doesn't even sound like Jeff. It sounds like ME.

You're stupid, stupid!

But this one goes to 11....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BTW, not to sockpuppet -- last two posts were from me, 5 person office (we hired someone today)

Hey, congrats on the new coworker! Looks like the economy is finally improving.

Yes, hooray, was-4-person-but-now-is-5-person-office! A ray of sunshine in the middle of an otherwise dismal (but weirdly fascinating) thread.

Seriously! I'm psyched. We really needed the help. The position has been open for some time because we are non-profit and can't really pay well in the best of economic times.

[Anonymous]

Jeff, do you have a day job? If so, where is it at? I'm just wondering since you seem to have so much time to monitor the site for unniceness..

From,
Not the banker or any of her friends

[Anonymous]

You are kidding, right? You don't know who Jeff is? That's rich.

Oh, and I think the banker is a bummer poster is Amy, and I agree with her defense of Jeff.

Signed,
Long time DCUM

[Anonymous]

I realize he runs the site. But aside from snark patrol what is his full time Real job?

[Anonymous]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/02/AR2005050201307.html

[Anonymous]

So he's a stay-at-home dad? This explains everything. LOL

[Anonymous]

Those asking if he has a full time job because he spends so much time on here. I ask this question: How much time do any of you really spend with your kids or work yourselves? You seem to be on here an awful lot. I'm the poster that said that I think he's great and can referee anytime he wants. I know him and he's a terrific father and yes, he works. He loves the site and spends as much time on here as any of you do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are kidding, right? You don't know who Jeff is? That's rich.

Oh, and I think the banker is a bummer poster is Amy, and I agree with her defense of Jeff.

Signed,
Long time DCUM

DING DING DING DING DING! You won. I may be a bitch, but I am a fair and loyal bitch.

[Anonymous]

Do most people on here go through each thread on snark patrol? I think not.
I rarely go on many different threads at all. So I would bet that he IS actually on here a lot more than most.

[Anonymous]

oh boy... if jeff didn't know me I would post nasty nasty comments about that photo LOL

[Anonymous]

I cannot believe this has gone on for as long as it has-11 pages-someone has an agenda that has nothing to do with solving the nation's economic problems-people, get a life, move on, let it lie, go swimming, anything but prolonging this brain dead thread. Can anyone recommend a good boppy pillow? Just trying to get things back on track so we all can worry about the important issues.