Kaya Henderson has Undermined her own Leadership

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are the reading increases?

http://dcist.com/attachments/dcist_sarah/reading_dccas2014.jpg

Now THAT's relevant data! Some improvement is better than none, at least. Point scored.

Scores have been inching up for many years before "reform." Should all those superintendents get "credit" too -- what about the teachers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://allthingsedu.blogspot.com/2014/06/a-dcps-teacher-resigns.html

Thanks for sharing, good nutshell of what is happening in this city. The cluster, in particular, is a good example of great teachers seeking greener pastures.

[Anonymous]

The problem with Kaya is that she isn't qualified for the Chancellor position. She has ZERO school management experience. She has never been an assistant principal or principal. DCPS has 13 Instructional Superintendent, and Kaya doesn't have the professional qualifications for that role either. The current head of DCPS has two years teaching experience (Spanish). The only thing that Kaya has going for her is that she surrounds herself with people who are more qualified to do the job that she is currently doing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are the reading increases?

http://dcist.com/attachments/dcist_sarah/reading_dccas2014.jpg

Now THAT's relevant data! Some improvement is better than none, at least. Point scored.

Indeed. Amazing how the Crestwood folks are willing to throw those results overboard and bring the disaster years back so that their little kids don't mix with their actual neighbors' kids.

[Anonymous]

I think you need to take a closer look at the results you seem to be celebrating. With the exception of the Asian subgroup scores have flatlined or declined since 2008. The jump from 2007 to 2008 is an anomaly.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I think you need to take a closer look at the results you seem to be celebrating. With the exception of the Asian subgroup scores have flatlined or declined since 2008. The jump from 2007 to 2008 is an anomaly.

Also, some of those gains are a result of erasures rather than students.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think you need to take a closer look at the results you seem to be celebrating. With the exception of the Asian subgroup scores have flatlined or declined since 2008. The jump from 2007 to 2008 is an anomaly.

Also, some of those gains are a result of erasures rather than students.

Ha ha ha. Are you claiming that is widespread enough to justify the totality of the improvement? If so, proof? And, if you believe the progress at Deal and Wilson are just the result of erasures...why the Crestwood obsession with them? Time to move on.

[Anonymous]

Totality of the improvement? OSSE data confirms that there is de minimis improvement at best, despite IMPACT, TFA recruits, and all the Ed reform gimmickry. .