Trump fires commissioner of labor statistics to be fired after weak jobs figures

[Anonymous]

Trump again claimed the numbers were fake this morning. He should be impeached for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

??? Didn't Trump politically benefit from his inflated numbers over the summer? Then the numbers were downgraded once more data came in? You need to take another shot at your propaganda point I think. I appreciate you're all still working out the kinks on it, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

??? Didn't Trump politically benefit from his inflated numbers over the summer? Then the numbers were downgraded once more data came in? You need to take another shot at your propaganda point I think. I appreciate you're all still working out the kinks on it, though.

That may be the case--I don't know. If so, the person is incompetent for a systemically broken methodology and I continue to say good riddance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

+1 I just hate "a lack of honesty." Trump = honesty

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

??? Didn't Trump politically benefit from his inflated numbers over the summer? Then the numbers were downgraded once more data came in? You need to take another shot at your propaganda point I think. I appreciate you're all still working out the kinks on it, though.

That may be the case--I don't know. If so, the person is incompetent for a systemically broken methodology and I continue to say good riddance.

How do you not know? That's why Trump is incessantly whining right now and fired her. How are you opining on any of this if you don't know any of the facts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

+1 I just hate "a lack of honesty." Trump = honesty

No, Trump isn't honest, but neither was Biden, Hillary, nor Harris. They're all liars. If you're criticizing Trump for lying, you better never have voted for a Clinton. Otherwise, you're full of it if you claim honesty matters to you in a politician.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

??? Didn't Trump politically benefit from his inflated numbers over the summer? Then the numbers were downgraded once more data came in? You need to take another shot at your propaganda point I think. I appreciate you're all still working out the kinks on it, though.

That may be the case--I don't know. If so, the person is incompetent for a systemically broken methodology and I continue to say good riddance.

How do you not know? That's why Trump is incessantly whining right now and fired her. How are you opining on any of this if you don't know any of the facts?

Were you aware of the absurd pattern under Biden? I only know about it because it went on for so long that it was unavoidable. Trump hasn't been POTUS long enough for the same pattern to be revealed.

I don't know because I need a bigger sample. Unlike you, I am driven by the data, not politics. I am waiting to see if the pattern persists. I'll check back in once Trump has been in office for 18 months. Until then, it's premature.

[Anonymous]

Trump is a total liar claiming the BLS numbers aren’t real. He should be impeached. He cannot lead as a complete liar!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

They did go in both directions. Why are you lying?

[Anonymous]

Looks like the right move. Market show their approval today. Stock market way up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

??? Didn't Trump politically benefit from his inflated numbers over the summer? Then the numbers were downgraded once more data came in? You need to take another shot at your propaganda point I think. I appreciate you're all still working out the kinks on it, though.

That may be the case--I don't know. If so, the person is incompetent for a systemically broken methodology and I continue to say good riddance.

How do you not know? That's why Trump is incessantly whining right now and fired her. How are you opining on any of this if you don't know any of the facts?

Were you aware of the absurd pattern under Biden? I only know about it because it went on for so long that it was unavoidable. Trump hasn't been POTUS long enough for the same pattern to be revealed.

I don't know because I need a bigger sample. Unlike you, I am driven by the data, not politics. I am waiting to see if the pattern persists. I'll check back in once Trump has been in office for 18 months. Until then, it's premature.

You're clearly not waiting to see if the pattern persists because you're saying "good riddance". You're obviously driven by politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

??? Didn't Trump politically benefit from his inflated numbers over the summer? Then the numbers were downgraded once more data came in? You need to take another shot at your propaganda point I think. I appreciate you're all still working out the kinks on it, though.

That may be the case--I don't know. If so, the person is incompetent for a systemically broken methodology and I continue to say good riddance.

How do you not know? That's why Trump is incessantly whining right now and fired her. How are you opining on any of this if you don't know any of the facts?

Were you aware of the absurd pattern under Biden? I only know about it because it went on for so long that it was unavoidable. Trump hasn't been POTUS long enough for the same pattern to be revealed.

I don't know because I need a bigger sample. Unlike you, I am driven by the data, not politics. I am waiting to see if the pattern persists. I'll check back in once Trump has been in office for 18 months. Until then, it's premature.

You're clearly not waiting to see if the pattern persists because you're saying "good riddance". You're obviously driven by politics.

No, I said if the pattern is still presenting, then good riddance. It is a conditional statement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this the same person whose estimates under Biden had to be consistently downgraded after the fact? Honest mistakes go in both directions. A pattern of mistakes to benefit a political party shows a lack of honesty.

Good riddance.

+1 I just hate "a lack of honesty." Trump = honesty

No, Trump isn't honest, but neither was Biden, Hillary, nor Harris. They're all liars. If you're criticizing Trump for lying, you better never have voted for a Clinton. Otherwise, you're full of it if you claim honesty matters to you in a politician.

I'll give you that. The difference with Trump is that he is a self-dealing thief of a kind we have not seen before. The others (to include both Bushes) were/are just generic, self-interested phony politicians. There is no limit to what Trump will do, or lie about, or steal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rubio to the Rescue. There is no better or more obedient toadie.

He has no background in statistics and cannot run BLS.

He will run it just like trumpy wants it....filled with fictional numbers that will praise the king. America WAKE UP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump again claimed the numbers were fake this morning. He should be impeached for this.

This- blatant lies and right in front of cameras. The media has to stand together and combat all these lies.