Trump/ICE deports a 4 year old girl (legal immigrant) who relies on daily nutrient transfusion to survive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

522,000 children and adults are enrolled in West Virginia Medicaid. Total Medicaid spending in West Virginia is $5.5
billion. Financing for Medicaid is shared by states and the federal government; West Virginia receives $4.5 billion in federal Medicaid funding. I'd LOVE to cut them off as well.

So if I get the foreigner children to West Virginia their lives will be saved forever?! Can tourist visa ill children go on this Medicaid?

Is there a Whats App number we can text?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

The little girl had to show she had enough money to pay for care in the United States in order to be granted humanitarian parole. This would have been an element of her visa interview and she would have gone into CBP secondary upon arrival in the United States.

Excellent, send the foia results here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

You do know that people who think like you will ultimately be the ones who kill medicare, affordable quality healthcare for olds people.

Don’t come crying the sympathetic non ghouls on this board to save you when the death panel comes for you. I’ll be there with the “nay, not on my taxes” health care is only for the young and healthy poster board.

So Medicare and quality healthcare for old people also services new-to-the-country foreign children who are very ill?! That’s fantastic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

The little girl had to show she had enough money to pay for care in the United States in order to be granted humanitarian parole. This would have been an element of her visa interview and she would have gone into CBP secondary upon arrival in the United States.

The article explains that they didnt enter that way. She had several surgeries in a Mexico and was getting care there but understandably the parents wanted better care. She was immediately hospitalized for weeks at a children’s hospital in San Diego when they arrived at the border. She requires Total Parenteral Nutrition. California taxpayers are paying for her care through medi-cal (Medicaid program in California).

I’ll spread the good word, gracias America!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

The little girl had to show she had enough money to pay for care in the United States in order to be granted humanitarian parole. This would have been an element of her visa interview and she would have gone into CBP secondary upon arrival in the United States.

The article explains that they didnt enter that way. She had several surgeries in a Mexico and was getting care there but understandably the parents wanted better care. She was immediately hospitalized for weeks at a children’s hospital in San Diego when they arrived at the border. She requires Total Parenteral Nutrition. California taxpayers are paying for her care through medi-cal (Medicaid program in California).

No. She was granted humanitarian parole. Making an appointment through Trump’s CBP app doesn’t remove the obligation for a CBP officer to interview and grant parole. The article says that it was granted for two years.

Then it gets renewed, right?

It needs to get renewed or else she will die! She needs the CA taxpayer funded daily nutrition treatment to live! That’s why her parents came to America with all of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

The little girl had to show she had enough money to pay for care in the United States in order to be granted humanitarian parole. This would have been an element of her visa interview and she would have gone into CBP secondary upon arrival in the United States.

The article explains that they didnt enter that way. She had several surgeries in a Mexico and was getting care there but understandably the parents wanted better care. She was immediately hospitalized for weeks at a children’s hospital in San Diego when they arrived at the border. She requires Total Parenteral Nutrition. California taxpayers are paying for her care through medi-cal (Medicaid program in California).

No. She was granted humanitarian parole. Making an appointment through Trump’s CBP app doesn’t remove the obligation for a CBP officer to interview and grant parole. The article says that it was granted for two years.

Further, this treatment is not available in Mexico which is the pprimary reason they came here...not free healthcare.
People are so damned dumb and cruel

Exactly! Come one, come all! Free R&D and treatments in America!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have no idea who is paying for her care. So next.

We know it isn’t her family.

Often times, humanitarian organizations pay for that care. In order to receive legal entry into the states, you have to show proof you can pay for care. I don’t know the circumstances behind this child’s care, but it was likely paid for.

For two years and then it wasn’t. She was born very premature and can over at age 2. Now is age 4 and her program term has ended. Parents don’t have the next step in place and visas expired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m sure they have TPN in Mexico!

They do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s also sad is that this family was working hard and doing all the right things to help their daughter. They were here legally, and working. They weren’t the kind of immigrants MAGA says they hate, so I think MAGA must hate all immigrants.

As workers, they have also paid into social security. This is money that they will never see.

Like all working non-naturalized immigrants, they are paying into the system, and ultimately subsidizing the retirement of American workers who will draw upon social security when they are able to upon retirement.

What income and SS taxes did they pay the two years the entire family was here for her free treatment term? Quantify the on the books w-2 income reported.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Mexico such a mess with vast natural resources and intelligent and hard working people?

Because USA pays billions of dollars to drug cartels.

Exactly, maybe the drug cartels can run free treatment programs for Mexican premies, with all their drug profits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

The little girl had to show she had enough money to pay for care in the United States in order to be granted humanitarian parole. This would have been an element of her visa interview and she would have gone into CBP secondary upon arrival in the United States.

The article explains that they didnt enter that way. She had several surgeries in a Mexico and was getting care there but understandably the parents wanted better care. She was immediately hospitalized for weeks at a children’s hospital in San Diego when they arrived at the border. She requires Total Parenteral Nutrition. California taxpayers are paying for her care through medi-cal (Medicaid program in California).

No. She was granted humanitarian parole. Making an appointment through Trump’s CBP app doesn’t remove the obligation for a CBP officer to interview and grant parole. The article says that it was granted for two years.

Further, this treatment is not available in Mexico which is the pprimary reason they came here...not free healthcare.
People are so damned dumb and cruel

how much have you donated through her gofundme page?

Clever retirt I actually donated a hundred dollars because my guess this is for the legal fees to stop the deportation that will most likely kill her daughter.

You are still dumb and cruel

is a token amount the max you can afford? if you believe the story and true and you care about this particular child, why don't you do something meaningful to help her.

Keep digging your inhuman hole. You are a douche and classic deflection. Instead of focusing on random scum posters, reflect on what the govt is doing to this child. Its not going away because you want it to.

Be a human instead of a botted troglodyte.

How dare Mexico not support its young.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When confronted with the fact that the parents are paying for this treatment.... When confronted with the fact that they are here legally.. when confronted with the fact that the doctor says that this treatment has to happen within us borders.. all these idiots can come up with are ad hominem attacks and weird ass deflections about the Pole.

They've lost the plot in the argument and this is all they have. Their dark bitter souls bear to the world

They are absolutely not paying for this treatment. California taxpayers are. An article in the LA times states the girl is on medi-cal (the CA version of medicaid), ""S.G.V.’s care is covered through Medi-Cal."
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-05-27/deportation-trump-healthcare-immigration-humanitarian


The father is an uber Driver from Colombia and the mother works cleaning restaurants and is from the Mexican state of Oaxaca. The parents met in Cancun, where they were working. Just before S.G.V. was born, the couple moved to nearby Playa del Carmen so her husband could work as an Uber driver. The girl spent most of her life in a hospital in Playa del Carmen, Mexico, tethered to feeding tubes 24 hours a day. She has short bowel syndrome, a rare condition that prevents her body from completely absorbing the nutrients of regular food. Doctors told them to relocate to Mexico City to get better care.

So when they heard the US government begun offering migrants appointments with border agents through a phone application called CBP One they signed up. Those let in received two-year protection from deportation and work permits. The father "told agents that he had once been kidnapped by cartel members in Mexico who extorted money and threatened to kill him. They also looked at the girl, whose vulnerable condition was obvious."

It would be heartbreaking for her to go back to Mexico since she is already here, but the US need better policies on who is let in and who isn't long-term. And if they accept people who cost a substantial amount to care for then the federal government should be responsible not each city or county or state.

People talk about Canada and Australia and wanting to leave for those countries. Neither of those countries allow anyone who is going to cost their health care or education system to easily immigrate or once in those country to stay. No allowing elderly migrant parents to immigrate and use expensive free health care. Australia has visa health care requirements. A few years ago a German doctor who was who legally working in Australia in a rural area was denied permanent residency because he had a son with Down syndrome and was judged by officials as likely to be a permanent drain on taxpayer funding due to his condition.

Thanks for the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A two year humanitarian parole was provided to get her stabilized. She had that and was back at home, out of the hospital. It was never the government’s intent, not Biden’s and not Trump’s, to have her and her family live in the US permanently.

So did they go home to Mexico after the two year free treatment ended and their two year family visas expired?

[Anonymous]

Thank gawd we cut university life science R&D grants so we can stop going bankrupt giving away free treatments to pregnant and ill people bum-rushing the border to get to that same San Diego or Del Rio hospital.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am fine with her staying as long as the above posters are paying for the care and not just tax payers.

Lemme guess. You’re fine with a $45 million birthday (oh sorry, “Army”) parade and Trump using his position to generate more wealth while giving inside trading info to his rich buddies.

But a sick little girl receiving humanitarian aid is a bridge too far.