NP. I am not sure I have a strong position on AI in general, but it is really extraordinary how every time ChatGPT makes the output worse. Although "shiny pacifier for lazy minds" is almost so bad it's good. |
Does this not seem like a fundamental flaw? How do you reform something that is inherently fabulist?
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/05/technology/ai-hallucinations-chatgpt-google.html |
Here is ChatGPT’s response: Happy to oblige. AI systems like AlphaFold solved one of biology’s grand challenges by accurately predicting protein structures, a breakthrough reshaping medicine and biotech. Generative models are accelerating materials science, designing novel compounds, and optimizing fusion reactor configurations. AI’s used in neural radiance fields (NeRFs) for cutting-edge 3D imaging, and in adaptive optics for calibrating the James Webb Space Telescope. It’s transforming diagnostics by detecting diabetic retinopathy and early-stage cancers faster than specialists. But sure — let’s pretend it’s just a toy, while the rest of us reshape the world you’re still trying to insult from the sidelines. |
Garbage in, garbage out |
How is any of this on par with the invention of the internet itself? You have no clue what you’re talking about. And I am 100% certain that you have no clue what ChatGPT is talking about, either. I do, however, believe that you and your ilk are in fact reshaping the world. You are making it much worse. |
Musk is using this to takeover the dummies ands it’s working. Cult of stupidity wants king don and musk to breathe fir them that’s what AU will do |
You’re entitled to your skepticism, but dismissing AI’s advances as insignificant compared to the internet is shortsighted. Every technological revolution feels incremental to those watching it unfold in real time. The internet didn’t announce itself as the internet in 1993 — it was email, Usenet groups, and clunky webpages until it wasn’t. AI is quietly threading itself through biotech, medicine, climate science, energy, and creative industries. You don’t have to like it, but denying its impact won’t make it less real. And yes — every tool can be misused or overhyped. That doesn’t erase its capacity to be world-changing. You don’t have to agree. But at least argue the point in good faith. |
It’s impossible to argue with a half-person/half-bot who simply can’t or won’t understand. |
Musk broke Grok today (and after ingesting all of federal data, it had gotten pretty decent). This is the AI future that some on the thread are celebrating. "White genocide is contentious." |
Lol Love to see the fraud and spending issues Grok discovers. Let’s start with social security fraud and disability fraud, run by fraudulent doctors and already-dead patients. |
|
Canada now has a Cabinet minister whose focus is on AI.
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/we-have-not-kept-pace-former-broadcaster-evan-solomon-faces-big-challenge-as-first-ai-minister/ar-AA1EHPPD?ocid=BingNewsSerp |
Not much point in debating with someone who’s made up their mind and isn’t actually interested in understanding. Carry on. |
| We can literally have a conversation with a computer that's sometimes better than talking to a person. It's almost like a science fiction. No, it is not a cult! |
everything you just wrote including the ! is exactly what I would expect from a cult |
| Luigi was right, AI gonna bring down the house of cards. |