We were just talking in our family how feds often make the choice for much lower salary for much higher job security As for stress -- not many people's experience |
Where are you getting this? Only 3.9% of all federal workers make $150,000 or more. |
If someone has that many other "expenses" in their lives, they probably shouldn't be considering $90K+/year colleges while making only $300K and having not saved for it. Once again, life happens. everyone has things that come up and suck, you deal with them. But for someone who has that many financial ills along the way, overextending themselves to go to an elite private University is probably still not a smart financial decision. So the reasons don't really matter. It's the fact they cannot afford those schools, so they should make the financial choices they can afford. Like literally most people are forced to do for college and everything else in life. |
So if you have been only making $200K as a family, are you actually considering $90K+ universities for each of your kids? Serious question. Because I cannot imagine doing that unless I had it already saved. Is that fair? No, but much of life isn't "fair". Nobody is saying the kids cannot attend college, just that they will have to attend one the family can afford. just like most responsible people do. |
Yes, two people losing their jobs at the same time (jobs that are actually protected by law, mind you) is just like “everything else in life.” |
No, because we always planned for/to be able to live on only one salary. The rest was used for all the "extras" in life. And with a 12 month EF, we would bust our asses to find any work we could to bring in income so we could stretch that EF as long as possible. All while still searching for a new career position we actually wanted. |
$400k??? Who the F is that? |
Lol this is about living on zero salaries, not one. Reading is not this group’s strong suit. You would not be calm in this situation. Especially if you had worked a job that didn’t have clear parallels in the private sector. |
+1 There are a couple of very angry-sounding people on this thread. Maybe it's just one person. But someone out there is fixated on how feds "should have planned better," can't possibly be dealing with things like medical expenses/elder care/etc. (Should have planned better than to be chronically ill or have an aging parent!), and also are expecting to send kids to $90K-a-year colleges. All of that is such nonsense. So many assumptions that a dual-fed famliy is upset because they can't send the kid to Harvard or Stanford, when the reality is that they're upset they might not be able to afford Podunk State U. The PP who responded with "this is why we always planned to live on one salary" is the worst. Many couples do just that, but planning for the sudden loss of both people's jobs, simultaneously, is another level altogether. Such smugness, and lack of empathy in some PPs here. |
Who said anyone with such expenses WAS "considering $90K+/year colleges" at all? You seem to enjoy making up scenarios to support your belief that people are naive and stupid about money, and your belief that feds who are parents are clamoring for "an elite private university" for their kids, budget be damned. Not everyone in federal service, or on DCUM, is the idiot you want to believe they are. Guess it makes you feel superior to think you plan better than anyone ever has, and have a right to wag your finger at others. |
In private, there are always layoffs, and yes, we plan for it being on one salary. We've been fortuante but we know its a possibility at any time. With two incomes, you have more ability to save. |
Do you not get some of it is lifestyle choices. If you choose to spend to the max, that's on you. Its not smug, its common sense. |
NP. That family would get FA at top.schools. |
+1. A thread filled with strawmen just to make people feel better about themselves. |
Yes, as others have said, many feds trade income for job security and the notion of contributing to society. So much for that with this administration. Feds are a convenient patsy for the greedy power mongers in office. |