My dad is a professor in STEM discipline. He didn't take any calculus until undergrad and routinely laughs at my wanting Algebra 1 in 7th grade and Calc BC in 11th (the track I took) to be an option for my kids. Anyone who says Algebra 1 in 5th is "basic elementary math learning" is a troll or so seriously divorced from reality that a meaningful conversation is not possible. Do you people even remember high school math...at all? Do you remember how much it takes to learn Algebra 2 for even decently bright, hard working kids? |
This statement is ridiculous. There are no barriers to basic elementary math learning. |
And my guess is your child is not an URM. That's what is unjust, barriers established that only college educated parents can crack through. Barriers to exclude URMs from advanced math. So much for equity. |
equity more than often involves reducing everyone to the same floor. Never involves enabling the under represented to enroll in advanced math. |
Serious question: what do you believe the advanced math track is? What do you believe a standard math track is? What about remedial? |
I did not have the opportunity to skip a grade in math. I spent all of Algebra 2 reading fiction books under the desk, not paying the slightest bit of attention, and still acing the course. I got perfect scores on the ACT math and SAT math in 8th grade. The regular path was not challenging enough. I have one kid who did Algebra I in 7th grade. I have another who took it in 4th. Both of them were appropriately placed, and neither of them found any step of the way overly challenging. My 4th grade Algebra I kid felt that 8th grade AP Calculus was the first time that school math was even slightly challenging. Kids have a range of giftedness, motivation, and temperament that may make acceleration appropriate or inappropriate. There is no obvious answer. Also, PP, is your kid just at the 99th percentile cut, or are they far above it? My 7th grade Algebra I kid was right around the 99th percentile cut. My other one was off the charts. Not all 99th percentile scores are equal. |
Sure. Back in the day, people didn't take Calculus in high school. I hope your dad realizes that nowadays, kids who don't take Calc BC in high school won't even be admitted to the STEM programs at his college. He's very out of touch with current admissions practices if he's laughing at you for wanting your kid on a track that would make it possible for you kid to be admitted into decent STEM programs. |
Sure and I've told him that. But there's still a difference between the track I'm asking for (which is pretty widely available, honestly) and acting like all kids should be offered an even more advanced track which is much less widely available. There's an even bigger difference between what I'm talking about and acting like Algebra 1 is "basic elementary math." Kids for whom Algebra 1 is basic aren't average, I'm sorry. That's like saying all NBA players are merely average for basketball. |
Your father, like many Boomers, doesn't understand how the modern world is more advanced and competitive. Also, back then, advanced students like my parents didn't take calculus in high school... because they skipped and graduated high school a year early. Modern students don't skip, if they have access to advanced curriculum at high school. Which is good. |
I agree with you. I don't think there's any benefit of pushing for an even more advanced track than 7th grade Algebra if the kid is thriving in the 7th grade Algebra track. But, I don't see the point in adding barriers or gatekeeping for kids who are eminently capable of greater acceleration and who are bored out of their minds in their current track. If a kid is scoring 3+ years above grade level in iready, FCPS should treat the kid like an outlier whose needs must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. For some kids, acceleration is the right answer. For others, it might not be. |
Maybe my problem with not understanding some posters is that, at our school, kids are pushed pretty well and accelerated pretty well. No principal is saying, "Hey, you meet all the criteria for Algebra 1 in 6th, but I don't want to so you can't." People are acting like it's super common in FCPS for that kind of thing to happen, or like the Algebra 1 in 6th track is super hidden. But no one has proof. And the one poster who is specifically saying it's hidden from URM certainly hasn't provided proof. Plus people are speaking as if it's common to be prepared for that track, and I really don't think it is. Maybe common in small, very selective circles of friends, but not common county-wide. |
The really gifted ones skipped more than a year. Katherine Johnson, for example, graduated from high school and started college at age 14. She probably didn't take calculus in high school, but she almost certainly took it as a 14 or 15 year old. |
IAAT specifically, or a lower level Iowa Test? How do you know DC isn't ready for Algebra? |
IAAT. And DC's was not ready because the early units for math 7 this year threw her for a loop - there were a few concepts she needed to brush up on and it would have been tough to be in a credit bearing honors course while brushing up on them. Will be ready by next year. I wonder if the people pushing for more kids to just be plunked into Algebra 1 honors in 6th whether they want it or not are even thinking about the fact that this course goes on the transcript? |
So move to Loudoun County already. |