Personal theories that may or may not be based on facts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Any theory on why girls are developing sooner but boys aren’t? My child’s 5th grade girls are all growing, in puberty. Boys are so young and like little boys. The 5th graders are like 8th graders from my time.

Girls have always hit puberty on average 2 years earlier than boys. It’s just happening even earlier now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Children who are encouraged to use language like like "trauma" and "harm" to describe normal hardships and difficult but manageable setbacks end up becoming college students who lack resilience and intellectual rigor.

"Children up to age of 30 are NOW encouraged...." is really what this should say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
My theory is that attacks on abortion rights are a response to the browning of American. More white babies are needed, so access to abortion goes away to increase that demographic.

I've heard this many times and thought it was common knowledge.

really? are whites more likely to abort when it's legal?

No whites are the least likely to abort:

https://erlc.com/resource-library/articles/the-demographics-of-abortion-in-america/

https://www.guttmacher.org/infographic/2017/abortion-rates-race-and-ethnicity

so how is abortion restriction a response to the "browning" of america

It's not the first poster about this was incorrect and clearly mistaken as the data above shows.

You should use punctuation. It will be easier forreaders to understand you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
My theory is that attacks on abortion rights are a response to the browning of American. More white babies are needed, so access to abortion goes away to increase that demographic.

????????????????????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Children who are encouraged to use language like like "trauma" and "harm" to describe normal hardships and difficult but manageable setbacks end up becoming college students who lack resilience and intellectual rigor.

Add “triggered” to the list

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On the topic of religion, my theory is God created the universe a few thousand years ago but he made it appear billions of years old right off the bat. Therefore evolution is correct and so is religion. Not my actual belief but why doesn’t anyone make this argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think women who eat a lot of peanut butter when pregnant end up with kids who have peanut allergies

I wonder if women who work out too hard and raise their body temp too much cause disabilities/autism. We know being in a sauna or hot tub is not ok for pregnant women. You can cook the fetus. I also wonder if women who have to work around very loud noises end up with children with similar issues. I don’t assume this is true but wonder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
My theory is that attacks on abortion rights are a response to the browning of American. More white babies are needed, so access to abortion goes away to increase that demographic.

I've heard this many times and thought it was common knowledge.

really? are whites more likely to abort when it's legal?

No whites are the least likely to abort:

https://erlc.com/resource-library/articles/the-demographics-of-abortion-in-america/

https://www.guttmacher.org/infographic/2017/abortion-rates-race-and-ethnicity

so how is abortion restriction a response to the "browning" of america

It's not the first poster about this was incorrect and clearly mistaken as the data above shows.

You should use punctuation. It will be easier forreaders to understand you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think women who eat a lot of peanut butter when pregnant end up with kids who have peanut allergies

I thought it was the opposite.

[Anonymous]

Our reliance upon plastics has led to the rise in allergies and cancers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m like the anti-vaxxer of sun screen. I can’t wrap my head around the fact that wearing SPF daily is the answer to preventing aging and skin cancer. Is smearing chemicals on our face really healthier for us than natural sunlight? All the research seems to say yes, but I just can’t get on board with this and kind of thing sunscreen is a scam. I also think sunscreen is destroying our reefs.

I totally agree on this one. I see a neurologist for migraines and he preaches how crucial sun exposure is.

I’m so confused too by people who live in northern climates who believe you have to apply sunscreen every day even if you work in an office and barely go outside. Can anyone explain?

I do avoid going outside between 10 and 3, when the sun is strongest, or if I have to go out during those times I apply sunscreen. But other than that I don’t see the need.

In other words, you agree that protecting your skin from the sun is necessary.

You basically just said:
"I am so confused why people protect their skin from the sun. I protect my skin from the sun."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Our reliance upon plastics has led to the rise in allergies and cancers.

Agree. My children drink from glass cups at home.
I can’t do glass or steel always, but I have more of it than average.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
My theory is that attacks on abortion rights are a response to the browning of American. More white babies are needed, so access to abortion goes away to increase that demographic.

????????????????????

White women have always been able to find a way to get abortions. If repugnicans are actually doing it for this reason, they are even more stupid than we all assume.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Taking drugs for ADHD, ASD, anxiety, depression only masks the symptoms and doesn’t solve the real problem.

Hilarious. You think ADHD and ASD can be solved? Please explain. Dying to hear your thoughts.

[Anonymous]

We have more learning disabilities, ADD, and mental illness in the United States than exists in other countries because the people who couldn't hack it in their countries of origin immigrated to the United States, whereas the high-functioning people stayed there.