Lawsuit targeting LGTBQ books in classrooms

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a non believer and ain’t no way in hell my kid is gonna be read soft porn at 7

I really hope you're a troll and not an actual parent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m a non believer and ain’t no way in hell my kid is gonna be read soft porn at 7

I'm a non believer and ain't no way in hell my kid is gonna learn how to throw hand grenades at 7 in PE

(equally relevant to MCPS)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Parents need to stay in their lane and let the professionals educate children and make these decisions.

It’s precisely BECAUSE of parents like those who filed the suit that we must make children read these books. We are educating them to make society a better place, not to allow the perpetuation of backwards and hateful attitudes that some parents and their churches groom and indoctrinate children to believe.

Not wanting our kids be taught that it's easy peasy to change your gender at 5 years old is hateful??

DP. Actually, your characterization of the book "A boy named Penelope" as "teaching that it's easy peasy to change your gender at 5 years old" does indicate, to me, that you have a hateful attitude about this.

Do you think it’s appropriate to tell a 5 yo that they can easily change back and forth from a girl to a boy?

Would you approve of the book if there were another page or two depicting Penelope's family's neighbor saying, "No way! I don't care what anybody says! Penelope is a girl, she will always be a girl, she will never be a boy, and that's that!" and then Penelope and Penelope's family were sad?