The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

In awe of the whine privilege Tucker is airing.
You can violently break into the capitol, dressed like a buffalo, and the police will let you do it.
Crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

No, the prosecution didn't have the new 44,000 hours of video. Only Tucker Carlson has that. McCarthy only gave the footage to him, not to prosecutors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

So by your standards, if a black man kills a white man and there is video of the white man physically assaulting the black man first and screaming racist bs, you would be ok with the white man’s lawyers withholding that video from defense. After all the black man was arrested, charged and convicted so it doesn’t matter, right?

That's an interesting hypothetical unrelated to anything we're talking about. Go talk to your 1L buds about this on Thursday.

In other words, you know I’m right

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

No, the prosecution didn't have the new 44,000 hours of video. Only Tucker Carlson has that. McCarthy only gave the footage to him, not to prosecutors.

The prosecutors were the Feds, right? Yes, they did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In awe of the whine privilege Tucker is airing.
You can violently break into the capitol, dressed like a buffalo, and the police will let you do it.
Crazy.

Well, then you get 41 months of prison, afterwards. That's the downside of fooling around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Let’s say the Feds had no idea that footage existed. Now they do. New trial?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Let’s say the Feds had no idea that footage existed. Now they do. New trial?

Haha

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

No, the prosecution didn't have the new 44,000 hours of video. Only Tucker Carlson has that. McCarthy only gave the footage to him, not to prosecutors.

The prosecutors were the Feds, right? Yes, they did.

So, you don't live in the DMV, do you? Since you seem to think that one fed is the same as another fed and they all know the same things, like the Borg.

[Anonymous]

So… if I rob a bank, and the police are there and don’t stop me as I do it… does that mean I didn’t commit a crime?
Serious question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Let’s say the Feds had no idea that footage existed. Now they do. New trial?

That's not the question. You keep saying it was deliberately withheld. What's your evidence of that? DOJ created a huge database for January 6 and let the defendants lawyers have full access to it. It included tons of video. So what is your evidence that they didn't get any relevant video?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

And every person prosecuted unfairly on this BS is in pain too, as are their families

Then don't do the crime. If they have been prosecuted and been found guilty, that is our system.

And, they were prosecuted without their attorneys having access to video that could well exonerate them or, at a minimum, prove that they did not realize they were doing anything wrong since they were, you know, welcomed into the Capitol.

You’re accusing prosecution of a Brady violation?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In awe of the whine privilege Tucker is airing.
You can violently break into the capitol, dressed like a buffalo, and the police will let you do it.
Crazy.

All you gotta do is get dressed like the royal order of the buffalo and you're good to go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In awe of the whine privilege Tucker is airing.
You can violently break into the capitol, dressed like a buffalo, and the police will let you do it.
Crazy.

All you gotta do is get dressed like the royal order of the buffalo and you're good to go.

I meant to type “white privilege”, but whine works too
Lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Dems have no issue with what about ism so here is a few for them.

They seem to have no issue with the radical far left who rioted and destroyed property when Trump was inaugurated. Those were anarchists and yes we had a problem with them

They seem to have no issue with the far left radicals who actually set of a bomb in the Senate building in 1983 nor do they have an issue with the fact Clinton pardoned those convicted.yes we had a problem with that, but you realize, that was 40 years ago, right?

They also have no issue with the fact the bomb went off outside an office of a former leader of the Klan who was the longest serving member in Congress. Let’s see Dems can apologize for their abhorrent behavior and get a pass.
While not a fan of leaving bombs, I can understand why someone would want to bombs a former Klan leader
The hypocrisy never ever stops!

So sure, let's equate some one off bad acts from decades past with thousands of "patriots" storming the US Capitol in the name of overthrowing a validated and issue free election in 2021.