Britney Spears attacking her kids

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

Yeah, it’s telling that all the people here attacking Britney are attacking her because she said her kids would have to make their way in the world. My guess is the people attacking Britney are probably exes living off of child support, and they are themselves freaking out at that getting cut off.

DP. I'm not "living off of child support" but our kids will get whatever money is left when DH and I die. Sure, we're not rich so we don't have to consider the problems that lots of money causes for children, but we also don't threaten to cut them off when they act "hateful" towards us. Of course teens act hateful towards their parents sometimes - if they never did, I would worry about insincerity.

She isn't totally cut off from her kids, she's had custody and/or visitation for their entire lives. Why wouldn't she want the best for them? Will she also "want her new baby to make his/her way in the world"? Or will the new baby get lots of money from her?

DP. So it’s okay for Britney to start working at 14 and then support her entire family but absurd for her to expect her kids to be independent at 18? Plenty of people from all backgrounds do not support their children after they reach adulthood. Add to that the fact that KFed should have money to give them as well considering the CS he receives doesn’t include the house they live in (owned and paid for by BS) or their private school tuition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

You are crazy. Her children "live off" of her money because they are her minor children. They are not leaches. They are her minor children. What kind of sick adult are you? There is something wrong with you if this is how you refer to her children.

You need to keep up. This is about when her minor children become ADULTS.

And you are the only one using the word “leaches”.

Triggered much?

Can you both please learn how to spell?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

What a dismal dysfunctional view of families, mothers and children. How bleak.

How so?

Let me guess, you believe a Mom is only good if she’s a martyr. Having no boundaries, okay with being gaslit, disrespected, okay with only giving without any receiving.

The dad is a loser, the boys will be men taught to disrespect their mother and women in general. They need time to learn how to adult without mommy’s money and hopefully they will learn that they need to unlearn the ways of their dad to get there.

But my guess is that they’ll find some rich young woman and try to hook them and live off of them too.

Britney had free choice to date, marry and have children with Kevin.

You can’t have it both ways. She’s so mentally ill that she can’t be legally in charge of herself for 10 years but sane enough to have the capacity to consent to getting married to a grifter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t condone her talking about her kids. But I do believe Kevin started all this with the intent to push her, knowing she was vulnerable. He wants her back in the conservatorship. Clearly, he’s worried about losing his income in a couple years. And I do see how Britney could actually in part be driven crazy by supporting umpteen members of her family while she feels taken advantage of. I don’t know if her perception of that is accurate with her parents but it does seem that way with Kevin.

K Fed is not only worried about losing child support in two years, he’s trying to make sure she doesn’t get more custody than 70/30 right now. Because that would mean he would get less money in the two years remaining. I think he will stir the pot and try to get 100%.

+100

She was also working much more during the conservatorship so maybe he’s also worried she could go to court and get a downward adjustment of CS based on her income decreasing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

Yeah, it’s telling that all the people here attacking Britney are attacking her because she said her kids would have to make their way in the world. My guess is the people attacking Britney are probably exes living off of child support, and they are themselves freaking out at that getting cut off.

DP. I'm not "living off of child support" but our kids will get whatever money is left when DH and I die. Sure, we're not rich so we don't have to consider the problems that lots of money causes for children, but we also don't threaten to cut them off when they act "hateful" towards us. Of course teens act hateful towards their parents sometimes - if they never did, I would worry about insincerity.

She isn't totally cut off from her kids, she's had custody and/or visitation for their entire lives. Why wouldn't she want the best for them? Will she also "want her new baby to make his/her way in the world"? Or will the new baby get lots of money from her?

DP. So it’s okay for Britney to start working at 14 and then support her entire family but absurd for her to expect her kids to be independent at 18? Plenty of people from all backgrounds do not support their children after they reach adulthood. Add to that the fact that KFed should have money to give them as well considering the CS he receives doesn’t include the house they live in (owned and paid for by BS) or their private school tuition.

Not only has she supported the entire lot but they have been terrible towards her, turning he kids against her etc. Horrible people. Why doesn't the court make her ex get a job?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

You are crazy. Her children "live off" of her money because they are her minor children. They are not leaches. They are her minor children. What kind of sick adult are you? There is something wrong with you if this is how you refer to her children.

You need to keep up. This is about when her minor children become ADULTS.

And you are the only one using the word “leaches”.

Triggered much?

Can you both please learn how to spell?

Quotes are not meant to correct spelling. That’s why they’re quoted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people are so invested in this drama and so convinced that they have personal, inside knowledge of the facts. People get hysterical over this topic and it is so bizarre.

We have no idea what's going on in that family. From all accounts it looks like the kids are well taken care of and are living a somewhat normal life, which is what most people would want for their children. Britney seems mentally ill, Federline seems cheesey, but other than that we have no idea if he's nice or a jerk or has other income. None.

Sounds like most posters on this thread didn't even read what she wrote. She didn't attack her kids at all.

Exactly.

Facts. Did you guys actually read what she wrote? She’s the one who should be mad. Like why are they even talking and giving interviews about her at all? Kfed is trash and her kid are old enough to know better. If they said that $hit about me, there would be hell to pay (in private). Y’all giving them too much. They know what’s up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saying her boys would be cut off from access to her money once they are adults snd would need to work is not abuse.

Her boys have learned from their dad to live off this woman’s money without any respect for the work she did for it. Not only that, she worked for it and had no access to it herself for most of her adult life while her ex and her kids, and every other family member did.

Her ex is a loser and absolutely scum for parading his teenage sons in TV encouraging them to badmouth her. Why? So she can be shamed into a corner and give them her purse.

The kids need to learn how to adult once they are adults. She can change her mind about inheritance down the road but they are not entitled to anything.

What a dismal dysfunctional view of families, mothers and children. How bleak.

How so?

Let me guess, you believe a Mom is only good if she’s a martyr. Having no boundaries, okay with being gaslit, disrespected, okay with only giving without any receiving.

The dad is a loser, the boys will be men taught to disrespect their mother and women in general. They need time to learn how to adult without mommy’s money and hopefully they will learn that they need to unlearn the ways of their dad to get there.

But my guess is that they’ll find some rich young woman and try to hook them and live off of them too.

Britney had free choice to date, marry and have children with Kevin.

You can’t have it both ways. She’s so mentally ill that she can’t be legally in charge of herself for 10 years but sane enough to have the capacity to consent to getting married to a grifter?

You're supporting my point...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people are so invested in this drama and so convinced that they have personal, inside knowledge of the facts. People get hysterical over this topic and it is so bizarre.

We have no idea what's going on in that family. From all accounts it looks like the kids are well taken care of and are living a somewhat normal life, which is what most people would want for their children. Britney seems mentally ill, Federline seems cheesey, but other than that we have no idea if he's nice or a jerk or has other income. None.

Sounds like most posters on this thread didn't even read what she wrote. She didn't attack her kids at all.

Exactly.

Facts. Did you guys actually read what she wrote? She’s the one who should be mad. Like why are they even talking and giving interviews about her at all? Kfed is trash and her kid are old enough to know better. If they said that $hit about me, there would be hell to pay (in private). Y’all giving them too much. They know what’s up.

The kids are being manipulated by their parent, someone they trust. They’re kids. No, they do not “know better”. The person to blame is K Fed, who is cashing in. You think they’re doing those interviews for free? Of course not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I hope for Preston's and Jayden's benefits there is a college trust for them. A trust so they can buy a first house. A trust so they can be comfortable. I hope Britney isn't really cutting them off at the age of 18 and they will have to struggle for college/whatever.

It is/was up to their father to set up a college trust for the kids out of the 40k per month they got since B has no say over any of her money until recently. And now I wouldn't give them a dime more than the court ordered amount.

JFC you are stone cold. These are kids that have had no choice in their upbringing.

Wait, you want me to feel sorry for a bratty ass celebrity kids that’s gets 20k a month?

Clearly you are not a parent.

Totally. I am on a parents board for fun listening to you moan about these poor spoiled kids and how dare they be cut off at 18. Boo hoo. They could have been banking 240k per kid per year. If their dad blew all that money that’s on him not for the mom to keep providing the gravy train especially if they aren’t talking to her. Good for you if you are bankrolling your kids but that’s not typical parenting.

You’re an awful person.

How is that PP awful? She is correct that this is transparently a money grab from their leech of a father.

I also still want to know specifically what Britney said that was an “attack” because I’ve seen nothing that would warrant that description.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people are so invested in this drama and so convinced that they have personal, inside knowledge of the facts. People get hysterical over this topic and it is so bizarre.

We have no idea what's going on in that family. From all accounts it looks like the kids are well taken care of and are living a somewhat normal life, which is what most people would want for their children. Britney seems mentally ill, Federline seems cheesey, but other than that we have no idea if he's nice or a jerk or has other income. None.

Sounds like most posters on this thread didn't even read what she wrote. She didn't attack her kids at all.

Exactly.

Facts. Did you guys actually read what she wrote? She’s the one who should be mad. Like why are they even talking and giving interviews about her at all? Kfed is trash and her kid are old enough to know better. If they said that $hit about me, there would be hell to pay (in private). Y’all giving them too much. They know what’s up.

The kids are being manipulated by their parent, someone they trust. They’re kids. No, they do not “know better”. The person to blame is K Fed, who is cashing in. You think they’re doing those interviews for free? Of course not.

My 10 year old know that he should not be talking about private family business in the public or even to other family members. Those kids are not strangers to the media and the ramifications of talking to the media. They are not babies. They have been in the limelight enough to know that it wouldn't go over well with their mom. They know she she has issues, so WHY do this? Maybe they wanted to hurt her. I think that's the real issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people are so invested in this drama and so convinced that they have personal, inside knowledge of the facts. People get hysterical over this topic and it is so bizarre.

We have no idea what's going on in that family. From all accounts it looks like the kids are well taken care of and are living a somewhat normal life, which is what most people would want for their children. Britney seems mentally ill, Federline seems cheesey, but other than that we have no idea if he's nice or a jerk or has other income. None.

Sounds like most posters on this thread didn't even read what she wrote. She didn't attack her kids at all.

Exactly.

Facts. Did you guys actually read what she wrote? She’s the one who should be mad. Like why are they even talking and giving interviews about her at all? Kfed is trash and her kid are old enough to know better. If they said that $hit about me, there would be hell to pay (in private). Y’all giving them too much. They know what’s up.

The kids are being manipulated by their parent, someone they trust. They’re kids. No, they do not “know better”. The person to blame is K Fed, who is cashing in. You think they’re doing those interviews for free? Of course not.

My 10 year old know that he should not be talking about private family business in the public or even to other family members. Those kids are not strangers to the media and the ramifications of talking to the media. They are not babies. They have been in the limelight enough to know that it wouldn't go over well with their mom. They know she she has issues, so WHY do this? Maybe they wanted to hurt her. I think that's the real issue.

People seriously expect more maturity from 15/16 year old boys compared to their 40 year old mother? I swear Britney Spears is one of the most coddled celebrities I’ve ever seen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people are so invested in this drama and so convinced that they have personal, inside knowledge of the facts. People get hysterical over this topic and it is so bizarre.

We have no idea what's going on in that family. From all accounts it looks like the kids are well taken care of and are living a somewhat normal life, which is what most people would want for their children. Britney seems mentally ill, Federline seems cheesey, but other than that we have no idea if he's nice or a jerk or has other income. None.

Sounds like most posters on this thread didn't even read what she wrote. She didn't attack her kids at all.

Exactly.

Facts. Did you guys actually read what she wrote? She’s the one who should be mad. Like why are they even talking and giving interviews about her at all? Kfed is trash and her kid are old enough to know better. If they said that $hit about me, there would be hell to pay (in private). Y’all giving them too much. They know what’s up.

The kids are being manipulated by their parent, someone they trust. They’re kids. No, they do not “know better”. The person to blame is K Fed, who is cashing in. You think they’re doing those interviews for free? Of course not.

My 10 year old know that he should not be talking about private family business in the public or even to other family members. Those kids are not strangers to the media and the ramifications of talking to the media. They are not babies. They have been in the limelight enough to know that it wouldn't go over well with their mom. They know she she has issues, so WHY do this? Maybe they wanted to hurt her. I think that's the real issue.

They're probably tired of seeing their mother repeatedly jiggling and dancing while barely covering her naked body for the WORLD to see. Name a teen boy who would like that kind of behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people are so invested in this drama and so convinced that they have personal, inside knowledge of the facts. People get hysterical over this topic and it is so bizarre.

We have no idea what's going on in that family. From all accounts it looks like the kids are well taken care of and are living a somewhat normal life, which is what most people would want for their children. Britney seems mentally ill, Federline seems cheesey, but other than that we have no idea if he's nice or a jerk or has other income. None.

Sounds like most posters on this thread didn't even read what she wrote. She didn't attack her kids at all.

Exactly.

Facts. Did you guys actually read what she wrote? She’s the one who should be mad. Like why are they even talking and giving interviews about her at all? Kfed is trash and her kid are old enough to know better. If they said that $hit about me, there would be hell to pay (in private). Y’all giving them too much. They know what’s up.

The kids are being manipulated by their parent, someone they trust. They’re kids. No, they do not “know better”. The person to blame is K Fed, who is cashing in. You think they’re doing those interviews for free? Of course not.

My 10 year old know that he should not be talking about private family business in the public or even to other family members. Those kids are not strangers to the media and the ramifications of talking to the media. They are not babies. They have been in the limelight enough to know that it wouldn't go over well with their mom. They know she she has issues, so WHY do this? Maybe they wanted to hurt her. I think that's the real issue.

They're probably tired of seeing their mother repeatedly jiggling and dancing while barely covering her naked body for the WORLD to see. Name a teen boy who would like that kind of behavior.

Really?! She’s been doing that her entire career so that’s nothing new to them. The only difference is that when she does it on IG she’s not getting paid for it. Hmm wonder why that’s so concerning to everyone!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why people are so invested in this drama and so convinced that they have personal, inside knowledge of the facts. People get hysterical over this topic and it is so bizarre.

We have no idea what's going on in that family. From all accounts it looks like the kids are well taken care of and are living a somewhat normal life, which is what most people would want for their children. Britney seems mentally ill, Federline seems cheesey, but other than that we have no idea if he's nice or a jerk or has other income. None.

Sounds like most posters on this thread didn't even read what she wrote. She didn't attack her kids at all.

Exactly.

Facts. Did you guys actually read what she wrote? She’s the one who should be mad. Like why are they even talking and giving interviews about her at all? Kfed is trash and her kid are old enough to know better. If they said that $hit about me, there would be hell to pay (in private). Y’all giving them too much. They know what’s up.

The kids are being manipulated by their parent, someone they trust. They’re kids. No, they do not “know better”. The person to blame is K Fed, who is cashing in. You think they’re doing those interviews for free? Of course not.

My 10 year old know that he should not be talking about private family business in the public or even to other family members. Those kids are not strangers to the media and the ramifications of talking to the media. They are not babies. They have been in the limelight enough to know that it wouldn't go over well with their mom. They know she she has issues, so WHY do this? Maybe they wanted to hurt her. I think that's the real issue.

They're probably tired of seeing their mother repeatedly jiggling and dancing while barely covering her naked body for the WORLD to see. Name a teen boy who would like that kind of behavior.

What is the difference between that and her wearing a nude body stocking and doing the same thing at the VMAs? Or in a number of her videos? She’s been making money by dancing half naked since she was a young teen. But now that she’s not supporting her parents with that money it’s a problem.