LCPS teacher resigns in public spectacle over CRT

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At least she quit unlike Tanner. Someone who can’t even bring herself to respect kids shouldn’t work with them. Glad she recognized it and left.

Byron. Not Tanner.

If he can’t have enough respect to use children’s preferred pronouns, he doesn’t deserve the courtesy of anyone using his preferred name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

Was it really necessary to make that nasty comment about Walmart?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Which isn’t happening, either. Idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least she quit unlike Tanner. Someone who can’t even bring herself to respect kids shouldn’t work with them. Glad she recognized it and left.

Byron. Not Tanner.

If he can’t have enough respect to use children’s preferred pronouns, he doesn’t deserve the courtesy of anyone using his preferred name.

I considered that but I don’t want to stoop to his level.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

Was it really necessary to make that nasty comment about Walmart?

The nasty comment wasn’t about Walmart. It was about her. I was just pointing out that she is forever unemployable now. Except is probably the right-wing bubble or retail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Race isn’t CRT, nor is equity. You have distilled CRT into whatever subject you just don’t want discussed but that’s not how it goes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Could you please elaborate on exactly what those aspects are?

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At least she quit unlike Tanner. Someone who can’t even bring herself to respect kids shouldn’t work with them. Glad she recognized it and left.

Byron. Not Tanner.

If he can’t have enough respect to use children’s preferred pronouns, he doesn’t deserve the courtesy of anyone using his preferred name.

I considered that but I don’t want to stoop to his level.

Why not? I am done playing nice with bad-faith right-wingers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

She's hot enough that she'll probably end up on Fox News, which I bet was in the back of her mind

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have kids in LCPS and am anti-CRT (the radical bits), but this strikes me as grandstanding.

Oh, does CRT give you too much cognitive dissonance? Poor thing.

Do you actually believe it’s being taught in elementary school? It isn’t. If you think it is, you are as gullible as the rest of them.

This idiot woman quit over her hatred of trans people, in any case. Ironic since Jesus would side with the trans kids.

I like how non-Christians presume to know what Jesus would do.

Pp here. Sweetheart, I am Methodist. And Jesus was a radical social justice warrior. He would stand with the children and
not one thing in the Bible talks about trans anything.

Oh, sweetie, I see you've camped out on this thread this morning. I'm sure your SJW Jesus would be OK with all sorts of sinful behavior but the Jesus of the Bible would not be.

Matthew 18:10.

Oh I’ve read that one.

Matthew 18:10
Sh1t on the children if they are different. Hate and break them with all of your might.

Jesus is a ruthless MFer.

[Anonymous]

Miss Methodist is proof that many devout church goers have nothing in common with what Jesus taught. They barely even understand the man let alone follow him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Miss Methodist is proof that many devout church goers have nothing in common with what Jesus taught. They barely even understand the man let alone follow him.

Naw, you are proof of the corruption of Christianity and your bizarre attempts to appropriate the teachings of Jesus to rationalize your bigotry.

You are a terrible human being and will burn in Hell for all eternity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Miss Methodist is proof that many devout church goers have nothing in common with what Jesus taught. They barely even understand the man let alone follow him.

Naw, you are proof of the corruption of Christianity and your bizarre attempts to appropriate the teachings of Jesus to rationalize your bigotry.

You are a terrible human being and will burn in Hell for all eternity.

Because I use kids’ pronouns? Lol ok

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Miss Methodist is proof that many devout church goers have nothing in common with what Jesus taught. They barely even understand the man let alone follow him.

Naw, you are proof of the corruption of Christianity and your bizarre attempts to appropriate the teachings of Jesus to rationalize your bigotry.

You are a terrible human being and will burn in Hell for all eternity.

Because I use kids’ pronouns? Lol ok

Oh no wait I got you mixed up with whoever is saying don’t use them. Ok it’s not you, whoever the Christian is who won’t respect trans kids, you’re the bad one, not the Methodist

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Which isn’t happening, either. Idiot.

Pretty certain that aspects derived from its principles, such as properly emphasizing putting greater attention on racism and it's effects is being woven into the curriculum.