I SO French "tacos"

[Anonymous]

So... a panini with potatoes in it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So much for healthy European eating.

It’s fast food and originated from the projects. It sounds delicious. It’d make a killing in DC!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here - of course I found the place in Baltimore - I wanted to see if any were closer to DC! Would make my own but that's easier once I have actually had one.

Where in Baltimore? My vegetarian DD and her carnivore BF would love this.

[Anonymous]

This guy made them here at home in the States. I’m intrigued by the Algerian sauce : ketchup, mayonnaise, onions and ras el hanout .
https://www.sandwichtribunal.com/2021/01/haute-cocina-french-tacos-of-lyons/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Okay, that’s not what I was expecting at all, lol!

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/19/the-unlikely-rise-of-the-french-tacos

Not my taste, but to each their own!

It’s infuriating to me that the article does not include an actual photo of the food. Wtf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So... a panini with potatoes in it?

Definitely a panini! Can put anything in it. For potato lovers... diced potatoes, eggs, onions, butter and cheese. Easily the Italian meatless Friday "poor man's" meal in our house long ago. The key is the bread! And a good panini press.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, that’s not what I was expecting at all, lol!

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/19/the-unlikely-rise-of-the-french-tacos

Not my taste, but to each their own!

It’s infuriating to me that the article does not include an actual photo of the food. Wtf.

It’s the New Yorker, not Washingtonian. They don’t do photo spreads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, that’s not what I was expecting at all, lol!

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/19/the-unlikely-rise-of-the-french-tacos

Not my taste, but to each their own!

It’s infuriating to me that the article does not include an actual photo of the food. Wtf.

It’s the New Yorker, not Washingtonian. They don’t do photo spreads.

Since they included an illustration, surely they could have managed a single photo of the food that they dedicated an entire article to?

[Anonymous]

Here’s a recipe.
Basically a grilled burrito with fries in it, not rice.

https://youtu.be/Ay0Rw7an8-0

[Anonymous]

OP, no clue, but am I allowed to gloat that I read the article a couple weeks ago and therefore have kept up with my New Yorker subscription?

[Anonymous]

OP here - not gloating - just have not heard about these before the article and figured it would be the best way to explain it. AND I am so far behind on reading the dang things!

This board is ridiculous - half of the people tell you to do the things that you googled already and the other half criticize you. . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, that’s not what I was expecting at all, lol!

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/19/the-unlikely-rise-of-the-french-tacos

Not my taste, but to each their own!

It’s infuriating to me that the article does not include an actual photo of the food. Wtf.

It’s the New Yorker, not Washingtonian. They don’t do photo spreads.

Since they included an illustration, surely they could have managed a single photo of the food that they dedicated an entire article to?

You’ve obviously never read the New Yorker. Again, they don’t do photos. Perhaps you could try this new thing called “google image search”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, that’s not what I was expecting at all, lol!

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/04/19/the-unlikely-rise-of-the-french-tacos

Not my taste, but to each their own!

It’s infuriating to me that the article does not include an actual photo of the food. Wtf.

It’s the New Yorker, not Washingtonian. They don’t do photo spreads.

Since they included an illustration, surely they could have managed a single photo of the food that they dedicated an entire article to?

You’ve obviously never read the New Yorker. Again, they don’t do photos. Perhaps you could try this new thing called “google image search”?

Actually, I read the New Yorker online all the time, and they do indeed have photos. But thanks for your input, weirdly-butthurt PP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP here - not gloating - just have not heard about these before the article and figured it would be the best way to explain it. AND I am so far behind on reading the dang things!

This board is ridiculous - half of the people tell you to do the things that you googled already and the other half criticize you. . .

OP, I was just kidding! It's the rare moment I'm reading the current NYer, not backlogged, so I was just entertained to know what you were referring to b/c I'd read the article. Sorry I don't have any suggestions.

[Anonymous]

Ooooh this is like calling your pizzas "tarte flambees"