This bodes well with ACPS and return

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Meh. If I had a ton of money to burn, I'd send my kid someplace that was small enough to offer hybrid too.


Yeah, me too. But let's remember exactly what he specifically does for a living, in order to get this "burn money". He gets paid, by taxpayers, to provide a quality public education for all. And he's taking that money and going to private school. Because he's not able to do his job. That's why this is so maddening.

Why is that maddening? If ACPS doesn't have money to fix up buildings to make it safe for kids to return, or hire more teachers, or find an equitable way to get kids back in the buildings, what is he personally supposed to do? He's a superintendent, not a magician.

Obviously PP thinks his personal salary should be going to fixing all these things!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know plenty of public school teachers that send their kids to private schools in normal times. Why are you thinking this means anything? Sure, it looks bad but the superintendent is not forced to send his children to public school.

Where a fourth-grade teacher sends his or her kids is not at all the same level of interest as where a district superintendent sends his or her kids. You know that.

[Anonymous]

Every time this man talks it’s to espouse some nonsense about Equity for All, criticizing PODs because it creates inequitable environments for learning, Virtual + giving all kids of different needs everything they need to learn, making sure everyone can access learning, bla bla bla bullshit bullshit bullshit. Clearly ACPS is not a school district for people of means, as many of the people we know are sending their children to private. I suspect they won’t come back.

If he didn’t live in Alexandria and didn’t have his kids in ACPS before, it would be different, but he chose to live here upon his return, then opted out of ACPS, but keeps telling parents, No, really, it’s good. Promise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Every time this man talks it’s to espouse some nonsense about Equity for All, criticizing PODs because it creates inequitable environments for learning, Virtual + giving all kids of different needs everything they need to learn, making sure everyone can access learning, bla bla bla bullshit bullshit bullshit. Clearly ACPS is not a school district for people of means, as many of the people we know are sending their children to private. I suspect they won’t come back.

If he didn’t live in Alexandria and didn’t have his kids in ACPS before, it would be different, but he chose to live here upon his return, then opted out of ACPS, but keeps telling parents, No, really, it’s good. Promise.

The pods criticism is the height of Hutchings’ hypocrisy. He criticized ACPS parents for trying to do best for their children and then made the same sort of choice regarding his child.

[Anonymous]

Very bad omen for HS students returning this school year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: I know plenty of public school teachers that send their kids to private schools in normal times. Why are you thinking this means anything? Sure, it looks bad but the superintendent is not forced to send his children to public school.

Maybe that should be a contractual requirement, although ACPS has enough trouble attracting quality candidates.

Equity for All, indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every time this man talks it’s to espouse some nonsense about Equity for All, criticizing PODs because it creates inequitable environments for learning, Virtual + giving all kids of different needs everything they need to learn, making sure everyone can access learning, bla bla bla bullshit bullshit bullshit. Clearly ACPS is not a school district for people of means, as many of the people we know are sending their children to private. I suspect they won’t come back.

If he didn’t live in Alexandria and didn’t have his kids in ACPS before, it would be different, but he chose to live here upon his return, then opted out of ACPS, but keeps telling parents, No, really, it’s good. Promise.

The pods criticism is the height of Hutchings’ hypocrisy. He criticized ACPS parents for trying to do best for their children and then made the same sort of choice regarding his child.

I was not an advocate for Pods, but I have to agree with this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know plenty of public school teachers that send their kids to private schools in normal times. Why are you thinking this means anything? Sure, it looks bad but the superintendent is not forced to send his children to public school.

Where a fourth-grade teacher sends his or her kids is not at all the same level of interest as where a district superintendent sends his or her kids. You know that.

I guess, but the superintendent in our district doesn’t live in the district and his children go to a different public school. Is that better, worse or the same?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:some catholic schools are 5 days a week in person (Paul 6th)

My 5th grader is a Flint Hill 5 days a week. Myb9th grader is hybrid.

Of course the super any anyone else with means an opportunity would send their kids to private. The public option right now is dumpster fire. The leaders are suffering from absolute paralysis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know plenty of public school teachers that send their kids to private schools in normal times. Why are you thinking this means anything? Sure, it looks bad but the superintendent is not forced to send his children to public school.

Where a fourth-grade teacher sends his or her kids is not at all the same level of interest as where a district superintendent sends his or her kids. You know that.

I guess, but the superintendent in our district doesn’t live in the district and his children go to a different public school. Is that better, worse or the same?

Better. You attend the public school you're zoned for, so if you live in one jurisdiction and work in a different jurisdiction, then naturally one cannot expect your children to attend the schools you work in.

[Anonymous]

They are sending learning packets home for Q2 so no way they plan in person instruction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are sending learning packets home for Q2 so no way they plan in person instruction.

What???? No!!!!! Please tell me we're not reverting back to the shit show plan that was spring???? Where they send home packets that kids can't read, because they haven't been taught yet, and expect parents to do all the work????? I just can't with ACPS.

[Anonymous]

This is quite frustrating for those stuck in his public school system. I’m sure it was a tough decision considering his political aspirations. It could very well haunt him and put an end to that track.

[Anonymous]

This is quite frustrating for those stuck in his public school system. I’m sure it was a tough decision considering his political aspirations. It could very well haunt him and put an end to that track.

Who knows. At one point I would have said that making fun of the disabled, or veterans, or saying that you were going to grab women by the pu**y would put an end to one's political aspirations, but that seemed to prove untrue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This is quite frustrating for those stuck in his public school system. I’m sure it was a tough decision considering his political aspirations. It could very well haunt him and put an end to that track.

Who knows. At one point I would have said that making fun of the disabled, or veterans, or saying that you were going to grab women by the pu**y would put an end to one's political aspirations, but that seemed to prove untrue.

I know, right. We’ve slid so far. How do we even get back