Article on Frat Life at Dartmouth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The easy method is to ban fraternities, but they won't do it become alumni of fraternities bring in a lot of money.

Regardless as to it being an "unsafe" place for women, a lot of the "sexual assault" statistics are inflated and often outright fabricated with zero evidence. Feminists and those who majored in Gender Studies are constantly looking for new things to latch on to to grift off of with consulting fees/media appearances/books, etc. to the point that they are willing to ruin the lives of innocent (male) students to grift off of.

Hopefully you get laid one day.

Trinity College faced a similar dilemma with frats & alumni donations. They ended up forcing the Greek organizations to go co-Ed and have swiftly suspended frats for multiple years that violate the rules. Life goes on at Trinity.

I'm married, but thank you.

What Trinity did is great for Trinity, but try asking Dartmouth, W&L, UVA and the vast majority of Publics to disband Frat orgs and maintain the same level of alumni funding.

I’m sorry for your spouse. I hope you have a daughter one day so you learn some empathy. You sound very defensive; a questionable history, perhaps?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The easy method is to ban fraternities, but they won't do it become alumni of fraternities bring in a lot of money.

Regardless as to it being an "unsafe" place for women, a lot of the "sexual assault" statistics are inflated and often outright fabricated with zero evidence. Feminists and those who majored in Gender Studies are constantly looking for new things to latch on to to grift off of with consulting fees/media appearances/books, etc. to the point that they are willing to ruin the lives of innocent (male) students to grift off of.

Hopefully you get laid one day.

Trinity College faced a similar dilemma with frats & alumni donations. They ended up forcing the Greek organizations to go co-Ed and have swiftly suspended frats for multiple years that violate the rules. Life goes on at Trinity.

I'm married, but thank you.

What Trinity did is great for Trinity, but try asking Dartmouth, W&L, UVA and the vast majority of Publics to disband Frat orgs and maintain the same level of alumni funding.

I’m sorry for your spouse. I hope you have a daughter one day so you learn some empathy. You sound very defensive; a questionable history, perhaps?

I'm gay and we don't plan to adopt, but thank you for the judgement. Also find your lack of empathy towards the falsely accused/convicted and unjustly punished very weird, perhaps any ex's that you want to get back at with false accusations? Or are you just a petite authoritarian?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The easy method is to ban fraternities, but they won't do it become alumni of fraternities bring in a lot of money.

Regardless as to it being an "unsafe" place for women, a lot of the "sexual assault" statistics are inflated and often outright fabricated with zero evidence. Feminists and those who majored in Gender Studies are constantly looking for new things to latch on to to grift off of with consulting fees/media appearances/books, etc. to the point that they are willing to ruin the lives of innocent (male) students to grift off of.

Hopefully you get laid one day.

Trinity College faced a similar dilemma with frats & alumni donations. They ended up forcing the Greek organizations to go co-Ed and have swiftly suspended frats for multiple years that violate the rules. Life goes on at Trinity.

I'm married, but thank you.

What Trinity did is great for Trinity, but try asking Dartmouth, W&L, UVA and the vast majority of Publics to disband Frat orgs and maintain the same level of alumni funding.

I’m sorry for your spouse. I hope you have a daughter one day so you learn some empathy. You sound very defensive; a questionable history, perhaps?

I'm gay and we don't plan to adopt, but thank you for the judgement. Also find your lack of empathy towards the falsely accused/convicted and unjustly punished very weird, perhaps any ex's that you want to get back at with false accusations? Or are you just a petite authoritarian?

Your obsession with the falsely accused misses the rape forest for the trees. It’s bizarre how your first instinct is to go after victims. Perhaps a bit of victimhood in your past as well? It’s a cycle, unfortunately.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The easy method is to ban fraternities, but they won't do it become alumni of fraternities bring in a lot of money.

Regardless as to it being an "unsafe" place for women, a lot of the "sexual assault" statistics are inflated and often outright fabricated with zero evidence. Feminists and those who majored in Gender Studies are constantly looking for new things to latch on to to grift off of with consulting fees/media appearances/books, etc. to the point that they are willing to ruin the lives of innocent (male) students to grift off of.

Hopefully you get laid one day.

Trinity College faced a similar dilemma with frats & alumni donations. They ended up forcing the Greek organizations to go co-Ed and have swiftly suspended frats for multiple years that violate the rules. Life goes on at Trinity.

I'm married, but thank you.

What Trinity did is great for Trinity, but try asking Dartmouth, W&L, UVA and the vast majority of Publics to disband Frat orgs and maintain the same level of alumni funding.

I’m sorry for your spouse. I hope you have a daughter one day so you learn some empathy. You sound very defensive; a questionable history, perhaps?

I'm gay and we don't plan to adopt, but thank you for the judgement. Also find your lack of empathy towards the falsely accused/convicted and unjustly punished very weird, perhaps any ex's that you want to get back at with false accusations? Or are you just a petite authoritarian?

Your obsession with the falsely accused misses the rape forest for the trees. It’s bizarre how your first instinct is to go after victims. Perhaps a bit of victimhood in your past as well? It’s a cycle, unfortunately.

Recently a 29-year old gay political candidate was nationally lambasted and portrayed as a pedophile for consensually conversing with adult college students on a dating app where you can set the age limits of those you want to talk to

So yes I have a very good reason to be suspicious of the authoritarian sexual mores that feminists are propagating.

But of course, conservatives and petite authoritarians like you would love that, perhaps so you could claim sexual assault during your future divorce proceedings. Must say, I pity the poor guy that married you.

Also, the correct terminology is "accusers", not "victims".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The easy method is to ban fraternities, but they won't do it become alumni of fraternities bring in a lot of money.

Regardless as to it being an "unsafe" place for women, a lot of the "sexual assault" statistics are inflated and often outright fabricated with zero evidence. Feminists and those who majored in Gender Studies are constantly looking for new things to latch on to to grift off of with consulting fees/media appearances/books, etc. to the point that they are willing to ruin the lives of innocent (male) students to grift off of.

Hopefully you get laid one day.

Trinity College faced a similar dilemma with frats & alumni donations. They ended up forcing the Greek organizations to go co-Ed and have swiftly suspended frats for multiple years that violate the rules. Life goes on at Trinity.

I'm married, but thank you.

What Trinity did is great for Trinity, but try asking Dartmouth, W&L, UVA and the vast majority of Publics to disband Frat orgs and maintain the same level of alumni funding.

I’m sorry for your spouse. I hope you have a daughter one day so you learn some empathy. You sound very defensive; a questionable history, perhaps?

I'm gay and we don't plan to adopt, but thank you for the judgement. Also find your lack of empathy towards the falsely accused/convicted and unjustly punished very weird, perhaps any ex's that you want to get back at with false accusations? Or are you just a petite authoritarian?

Your obsession with the falsely accused misses the rape forest for the trees. It’s bizarre how your first instinct is to go after victims. Perhaps a bit of victimhood in your past as well? It’s a cycle, unfortunately.

Recently a 29-year old gay political candidate was nationally lambasted and portrayed as a pedophile for consensually conversing with adult college students on a dating app where you can set the age limits of those you want to talk to

So yes I have a very good reason to be suspicious of the authoritarian sexual mores that feminists are propagating.

But of course, conservatives and petite authoritarians like you would love that, perhaps so you could claim sexual assault during your future divorce proceedings. Must say, I pity the poor guy that married you.

Also, the correct terminology is "accusers", not "victims".

#Unhinged

Does Dartmouth pay you by the word?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh yeah. I am sure that those stories of girls getting raped at college are made up so Gender Studies professors can get TV appearances.

If you look at the scientific (public health) literature on sexual assault, it confirms that sexual assault is GROSSLY under-reported. Those researchers are probably all trying to get on TV also.

Listen to yourself.

Yeah just like the Duke Lacrosse case and UVA Rolling Stone were totally not made up.

The scientific evidence on sexual assault epidemic is extremely weak and basically based on surveys where literally everything counts as sexual assault. Somehow the number of students stating that they have been sexually assaulted has gone from 1/6 (already inflated) to 1/3 within a 2-3 years. This is not based on real trends, it's based on expanding the definition to include consensual sexual intercourse after barely drinking as rape, and anything without "explicit or affirmative consent" as rape and any level of "discomfort" as sexual harassment. Also sex after any level of requesting is rape. Basically by this definition, every married couple has raped each other (of course in reality only the male is considered the rapist). A Dean as Duke literally stated that when two drunk college kids have sex, the male is always guilty (and never the female)

The scientific literature on false accusations and false convictions on the other hand shows black men being imprisoned based on false accusations for 50+ years. The scientific literature on campus sexual assault shows that minority students are disproportionately getting kicked off campus with no attorney, no cross examination, no trial.

The solid fact sheet provided earlier was balanced, for example acknowledging that false reports exist, though they make up less than 90% of all reports. This poster obviously has a very biased ax to grind...and sounds like he should get a job working for Betsy DeVoss (or maybe her boss?)

10% of a massive number of innocents to expel/convict firstly. Secondly, how do they know that its not far greater than 10%, considering no trial, no attorneys, no cross-examinations are allowed during these proceedings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The easy method is to ban fraternities, but they won't do it become alumni of fraternities bring in a lot of money.

Regardless as to it being an "unsafe" place for women, a lot of the "sexual assault" statistics are inflated and often outright fabricated with zero evidence. Feminists and those who majored in Gender Studies are constantly looking for new things to latch on to to grift off of with consulting fees/media appearances/books, etc. to the point that they are willing to ruin the lives of innocent (male) students to grift off of.

Hopefully you get laid one day.

Trinity College faced a similar dilemma with frats & alumni donations. They ended up forcing the Greek organizations to go co-Ed and have swiftly suspended frats for multiple years that violate the rules. Life goes on at Trinity.

I'm married, but thank you.

What Trinity did is great for Trinity, but try asking Dartmouth, W&L, UVA and the vast majority of Publics to disband Frat orgs and maintain the same level of alumni funding.

I’m sorry for your spouse. I hope you have a daughter one day so you learn some empathy. You sound very defensive; a questionable history, perhaps?

I'm gay and we don't plan to adopt, but thank you for the judgement. Also find your lack of empathy towards the falsely accused/convicted and unjustly punished very weird, perhaps any ex's that you want to get back at with false accusations? Or are you just a petite authoritarian?

Your obsession with the falsely accused misses the rape forest for the trees. It’s bizarre how your first instinct is to go after victims. Perhaps a bit of victimhood in your past as well? It’s a cycle, unfortunately.

Recently a 29-year old gay political candidate was nationally lambasted and portrayed as a pedophile for consensually conversing with adult college students on a dating app where you can set the age limits of those you want to talk to

So yes I have a very good reason to be suspicious of the authoritarian sexual mores that feminists are propagating.

But of course, conservatives and petite authoritarians like you would love that, perhaps so you could claim sexual assault during your future divorce proceedings. Must say, I pity the poor guy that married you.

Also, the correct terminology is "accusers", not "victims".

#Unhinged

Does Dartmouth pay you by the word?

Unhinged for decrying Victorian sexual mores used by conservatives to vilify homosexuals, now adopted by feminists?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh yeah. I am sure that those stories of girls getting raped at college are made up so Gender Studies professors can get TV appearances.

If you look at the scientific (public health) literature on sexual assault, it confirms that sexual assault is GROSSLY under-reported. Those researchers are probably all trying to get on TV also.

Listen to yourself.

Yeah just like the Duke Lacrosse case and UVA Rolling Stone were totally not made up.

The scientific evidence on sexual assault epidemic is extremely weak and basically based on surveys where literally everything counts as sexual assault. Somehow the number of students stating that they have been sexually assaulted has gone from 1/6 (already inflated) to 1/3 within a 2-3 years. This is not based on real trends, it's based on expanding the definition to include consensual sexual intercourse after barely drinking as rape, and anything without "explicit or affirmative consent" as rape and any level of "discomfort" as sexual harassment. Also sex after any level of requesting is rape. Basically by this definition, every married couple has raped each other (of course in reality only the male is considered the rapist). A Dean as Duke literally stated that when two drunk college kids have sex, the male is always guilty (and never the female)

The scientific literature on false accusations and false convictions on the other hand shows black men being imprisoned based on false accusations for 50+ years. The scientific literature on campus sexual assault shows that minority students are disproportionately getting kicked off campus with no attorney, no cross examination, no trial.

The solid fact sheet provided earlier was balanced, for example acknowledging that false reports exist, though they make up less than 90% of all reports. This poster obviously has a very biased ax to grind...and sounds like he should get a job working for Betsy DeVoss (or maybe her boss?)

10% of a massive number of innocents to expel/convict firstly. Secondly, how do they know that its not far greater than 10%, considering no trial, no attorneys, no cross-examinations are allowed during these proceedings? [/quote

THey base their estimates on rigorous research, grounded in science, which is far more convincing that your rants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh yeah. I am sure that those stories of girls getting raped at college are made up so Gender Studies professors can get TV appearances.

If you look at the scientific (public health) literature on sexual assault, it confirms that sexual assault is GROSSLY under-reported. Those researchers are probably all trying to get on TV also.

Listen to yourself.

Yeah just like the Duke Lacrosse case and UVA Rolling Stone were totally not made up.

The scientific evidence on sexual assault epidemic is extremely weak and basically based on surveys where literally everything counts as sexual assault. Somehow the number of students stating that they have been sexually assaulted has gone from 1/6 (already inflated) to 1/3 within a 2-3 years. This is not based on real trends, it's based on expanding the definition to include consensual sexual intercourse after barely drinking as rape, and anything without "explicit or affirmative consent" as rape and any level of "discomfort" as sexual harassment. Also sex after any level of requesting is rape. Basically by this definition, every married couple has raped each other (of course in reality only the male is considered the rapist). A Dean as Duke literally stated that when two drunk college kids have sex, the male is always guilty (and never the female)

The scientific literature on false accusations and false convictions on the other hand shows black men being imprisoned based on false accusations for 50+ years. The scientific literature on campus sexual assault shows that minority students are disproportionately getting kicked off campus with no attorney, no cross examination, no trial.

The solid fact sheet provided earlier was balanced, for example acknowledging that false reports exist, though they make up less than 10% of all reports. This poster obviously has a very biased ax to grind...and sounds like he should get a job working for Betsy DeVoss (or maybe her boss?)

10% of a massive number of innocents to expel/convict firstly. Secondly, how do they know that its not far greater than 10%, considering no trial, no attorneys, no cross-examinations are allowed during these proceedings?

Let's all hold a pity party for the 10%, not the 90%

AND THOSE NUMBERS DO NOT COUNT the unreported (which make up the majority of VICTIMS. They are not accusers because most never reported!) The ones who do are truly brave because they know they will encounter the likes of you (and on college campuses, rabid sports boosters who would rather run a woman out of town than lose a football game!).

Parents of new or future students, watch "The Hunting Ground" to see how the system was set up. And whose rights were favored!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh yeah. I am sure that those stories of girls getting raped at college are made up so Gender Studies professors can get TV appearances.

If you look at the scientific (public health) literature on sexual assault, it confirms that sexual assault is GROSSLY under-reported. Those researchers are probably all trying to get on TV also.

Listen to yourself.

Yeah just like the Duke Lacrosse case and UVA Rolling Stone were totally not made up.

The scientific evidence on sexual assault epidemic is extremely weak and basically based on surveys where literally everything counts as sexual assault. Somehow the number of students stating that they have been sexually assaulted has gone from 1/6 (already inflated) to 1/3 within a 2-3 years. This is not based on real trends, it's based on expanding the definition to include consensual sexual intercourse after barely drinking as rape, and anything without "explicit or affirmative consent" as rape and any level of "discomfort" as sexual harassment. Also sex after any level of requesting is rape. Basically by this definition, every married couple has raped each other (of course in reality only the male is considered the rapist). A Dean as Duke literally stated that when two drunk college kids have sex, the male is always guilty (and never the female)

The scientific literature on false accusations and false convictions on the other hand shows black men being imprisoned based on false accusations for 50+ years. The scientific literature on campus sexual assault shows that minority students are disproportionately getting kicked off campus with no attorney, no cross examination, no trial.

The solid fact sheet provided earlier was balanced, for example acknowledging that false reports exist, though they make up less than 10% of all reports. This poster obviously has a very biased ax to grind...and sounds like he should get a job working for Betsy DeVoss (or maybe her boss?)

10% of a massive number of innocents to expel/convict firstly. Secondly, how do they know that its not far greater than 10%, considering no trial, no attorneys, no cross-examinations are allowed during these proceedings?

Let's all hold a pity party for the 10%, not the 90%

AND THOSE NUMBERS DO NOT COUNT the unreported (which make up the majority of VICTIMS. They are not accusers because most never reported!) The ones who do are truly brave because they know they will encounter the likes of you (and on college campuses, rabid sports boosters who would rather run a woman out of town than lose a football game!).

Parents of new or future students, watch "The Hunting Ground" to see how the system was set up. And whose rights were favored!

Firstly its far more than 10% of innocents getting falsely punished/convicted.

Secondly these surveys count the "unreported" and don't include those that are falsely accused.

Thirdly, it is accusers, not "victims" or "survivors"

Fourthly, the "Hunting Ground" movie has been just as the UVA Rolling Stones article was.

The issue with "sexual assault" on campus is the vast majority of accused male students getting expelled with no attorney, no trial, no cross-examination, often falsely accused and therefore falsely punished. They are often poor and minorities. The wealthy ones often go to trial in court as they can afford an attorney, and they have been winning lawsuit after lawsuit against colleges in courts throughout the country. .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh yeah. I am sure that those stories of girls getting raped at college are made up so Gender Studies professors can get TV appearances.

If you look at the scientific (public health) literature on sexual assault, it confirms that sexual assault is GROSSLY under-reported. Those researchers are probably all trying to get on TV also.

Listen to yourself.

Yeah just like the Duke Lacrosse case and UVA Rolling Stone were totally not made up.

The scientific evidence on sexual assault epidemic is extremely weak and basically based on surveys where literally everything counts as sexual assault. Somehow the number of students stating that they have been sexually assaulted has gone from 1/6 (already inflated) to 1/3 within a 2-3 years. This is not based on real trends, it's based on expanding the definition to include consensual sexual intercourse after barely drinking as rape, and anything without "explicit or affirmative consent" as rape and any level of "discomfort" as sexual harassment. Also sex after any level of requesting is rape. Basically by this definition, every married couple has raped each other (of course in reality only the male is considered the rapist). A Dean as Duke literally stated that when two drunk college kids have sex, the male is always guilty (and never the female)

The scientific literature on false accusations and false convictions on the other hand shows black men being imprisoned based on false accusations for 50+ years. The scientific literature on campus sexual assault shows that minority students are disproportionately getting kicked off campus with no attorney, no cross examination, no trial.

The solid fact sheet provided earlier was balanced, for example acknowledging that false reports exist, though they make up less than 90% of all reports. This poster obviously has a very biased ax to grind...and sounds like he should get a job working for Betsy DeVoss (or maybe her boss?)

10% of a massive number of innocents to expel/convict firstly. Secondly, how do they know that its not far greater than 10%, considering no trial, no attorneys, no cross-examinations are allowed during these proceedings? [/quote

THey base their estimates on rigorous research, grounded in science, which is far more convincing that your rants.

Their "science" is based on baseless, evidence-free surveys. Surveys with loose definitions of words is not science.

[Anonymous]

I love all of your citations.

I mean your opinions are just...so convincing.

[Anonymous]

The. Idiot. Is. Unhinged.

Can we please spill more tea about Dartmouth? Heard lots of bad things 2nd hand thru the women in my Ivy network about undergrad experiences and visiting for the weekend.

Is the MBA program any better?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The. Idiot. Is. Unhinged.

Can we please spill more tea about Dartmouth? Heard lots of bad things 2nd hand thru the women in my Ivy network about undergrad experiences and visiting for the weekend.

Is the MBA program any better?

Seems someone has been trolling today?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh yeah. I am sure that those stories of girls getting raped at college are made up so Gender Studies professors can get TV appearances.

If you look at the scientific (public health) literature on sexual assault, it confirms that sexual assault is GROSSLY under-reported. Those researchers are probably all trying to get on TV also.

Listen to yourself.

Yeah just like the Duke Lacrosse case and UVA Rolling Stone were totally not made up.

The scientific evidence on sexual assault epidemic is extremely weak and basically based on surveys where literally everything counts as sexual assault. Somehow the number of students stating that they have been sexually assaulted has gone from 1/6 (already inflated) to 1/3 within a 2-3 years. This is not based on real trends, it's based on expanding the definition to include consensual sexual intercourse after barely drinking as rape, and anything without "explicit or affirmative consent" as rape and any level of "discomfort" as sexual harassment. Also sex after any level of requesting is rape. Basically by this definition, every married couple has raped each other (of course in reality only the male is considered the rapist). A Dean as Duke literally stated that when two drunk college kids have sex, the male is always guilty (and never the female)

The scientific literature on false accusations and false convictions on the other hand shows black men being imprisoned based on false accusations for 50+ years. The scientific literature on campus sexual assault shows that minority students are disproportionately getting kicked off campus with no attorney, no cross examination, no trial.

The solid fact sheet provided earlier was balanced, for example acknowledging that false reports exist, though they make up less than 90% of all reports. This poster obviously has a very biased ax to grind...and sounds like he should get a job working for Betsy DeVoss (or maybe her boss?)

10% of a massive number of innocents to expel/convict firstly. Secondly, how do they know that its not far greater than 10%, considering no trial, no attorneys, no cross-examinations are allowed during these proceedings? [/quote

THey base their estimates on rigorous research, grounded in science, which is far more convincing that your rants.

Their "science" is based on baseless, evidence-free surveys. Surveys with loose definitions of words is not science.

Actually, part of what makes it science is that they define the variables they are measuring. It is called operationalization. You can disagree with their case definitions, but they are there for you to see. You can find other studies that define things other ways. That is literally how science works.

You are obviously not a scientist. If you were you would not be questioning the use of surveys to estimate the prevalence of private intimate behaviors.