I would agree with this, but I've often wondered, how did Engineering, Architecture, and Computer Science bypass this label? |
I am PP. I used to work for the University of Michigan and had access to all sorts of data on students' backgrounds, backgrounds of students in each major/college within the university, etc. Ross (business school) had far and away the wealthiest student body of all the undergraduate colleges at UMich, with the lowest percent of low-income/first generation students. Engineering was up there, too. |
| Engineering is not highbrow, architecture isn’t an undergrad degree, and comp sci is very borderline depending on how it’s taught. |
Wharton is an exception too. |
BBA is for morons. |
But is being a teacher, actually considered "low-brow" though? I can't say I consider it to be high-brow, but I've never really thought of it as low-brow either. And I know a lot of men in very professional jobs (lawyers, doctors, etc) who are married to teachers. But you really don't see such men married to Administrative Assistants, or Cosmetologists. |
This is correct. |
k-12 is low brow. College professor is high brow. |
| This is so stupid |
Agree. Anyone who says Engineering is highbrow doesn't understand the term. |
Again, I'm not sure I would agree with this. I think some people are mixing up difficult for high brow. High brow is something that a kid from an old money New England family might major in, and the traditional liberal arts definitely fit that bill, even though they are easier than many "low-brow" degrees such as nursing. Generally speaking, if it is offered as an undergrad degree at Harvard it fits the bill as high-brow (except for media studies, that one's a weird anomaly) |
+1 |
Lots of school offer an undergrad in architecture. |
This thread is meant to be for fun. If you are going to get offended by it, then it's not the right place for you. |
Lots of professional men are married to k-12 teachers. |