The Claremont Colleges are in no way, shape, or form urban. |
| Macalester is really unique in this regard. |
Yep. Not urban at all. My sister went there and she said LA far enough away where most kids rarely go. Very suburban. Very little to do nearby. |
I wouldn't call Reed urban either. It's outside of the downtown area of Portland and very wooded. |
OP asked for colleges that are in or near a 'decent size city.' Reed fits her definition even if it isn't what one might usually say is urban. |
| La Salle in Phila |
Yup -- I did my clerkship in Pasadena -- totally suburban -- in a nice way, but totally surburban. |
Compared to SLACs like Williams, Grinnell, Kenyon, etc, the Claremont colleges are "urban" - you have all the amenities of the city. By your definition no one in LA lives in an urban environment because the entire city is just a bunch of suburbs strung together. |
| Hopkins |
Ditto for Simmons. |
| I was intrigued by Mac but then I saw my kid’s major is impacted by waitlists for essential courses. Several posters on CC mentioned that students seen on tours seemed down in the dumps. |
I guess, if by “urban” you mean “not urban.” |
|
Def. not a SLAC. |
I interpreted "urban" as not rural/small town. For example we toured the 3 Maine SLACs (Bowdoin, Bates and Colby) this summer and the towns those schools are in make the area around the Claremont schools look like a raging metropolis. |