They actually do! |
So Comey goes through a full day of questioning - all about Hillary's email - behind closed doors, and within minutes, the GOP House runs to FOX to disclose their version of what was discussed and Trump is tweeting it.
|
Please explain this nonsense. |
Yeah, I can’t imagine why they didn’t just want the hearing public. |
Transcript of Comey’s Friday testimony has been released. It reveals that 1) Republicans’s found nothing of use to them and, 2) They’re throwing anything they can into the newscycle to try to distract from a president facing eventual indictment. |
The actual news out of Friday's testimony is Comey's confirmation that Rudy had been active with the NY FBI field office and the office and Rudy were being investigated for leaks. |
COMEY: "Mid October, maybe a little bit later, Mr. Giuliani was making statements that appeared to be based on his knowledge of workings inside the FBI New York ... that gave me a general concern that we may have a leak problem ... and so I asked that it be investigated." P. 152 |
He has a seriously flawed memory for someone who led the most elite law enforcement agency in the free world.
Comey’s non-answers: - Said “I don’t remember” 71 times. - Said “I don’t know” 166 times. - Said “I don’t recall” 8 times. |
Comey spells it out slowly for all of the Strozk-Page conspiracy idjits:
|
That's just a BS thing. You can ask anyone questions that they can't recall the answers to. What matters are the questions behind those. This is exactly what the Republicans wanted out of this interview. Fodder or the imbeciles. |
Are you sure that wasn’t Jeff Sessions’ testimony? |
1. If your boss directs you to help him draft a letter, will you say, "No sir." Neither did Strzok. 2. We don't know that he didn't tell anybody. He could well have been the source of the NY Times story that broke days before the election - perhaps this was the "insurance policy." https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html |
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andrew-c-mccarthy-why-trump-is-likely-to-be-indicted-by-manhattan-us-attorney
Andrew C. McCarthy: Why Trump is likely to be indicted by Manhattan US Attorney
If this is the case, he'll run again, with support. |
OMG, you people are some kind of dumb. You are the dumb that Trump depends on to continue to believe the version of events that he and Nunes have been pushing on you for two years. Give it a rest, TRUMP is the problem, not Comey. |