| Brown, no question. My sibling went there and loved it. |
She has been accepted into two of the most prestigious institutions on the planet. No need for cow college reverse snobbery. |
+1. And in terms of value, I went to an Ivy rather than a public school because with financial aid it was cheaper than public university for me. |
Why? In what ways is Chicago better? Just seems to be a grind for the sake of being a grind. It's not like you grind your tail off there and are rewarded with a 100K job. It's a grind for the same caliber, same comp jobs every kid at a top 30 college gets. |
| Since it is a toss up, use setting as a litmus test here. Providence and Chicago are two very different places! |
|
Chicago has a core program requirement.
Brown has an open-curriculum program. Generally, students at open-curriculum schools are happier, not having to take so many required distribution courses. |
| U Chicago grad here - I would choose Brown. |
| The reverse side of not having required core courses is that students at open-curriculum generally take courses they are passionate about. This is consistent with reports that Brown students generally are really happy about being there. |
Geography is interesting. Both are a little out of the way. But U of C's south side Chicago location ? the Chicago everything thinks of. And while half of Providence is slummy, it's on the Acela line, so quick hops to Boston and NYC. And the Atlantic ocean. |
=/=* |
| Unless she wants to go into academia or research, I would choose Brown. Everyone I know who went there loved it, whereas Chicago is a mixed bag (but no doubt, an excellent school). |
My kid had a strong opinion one way. At the same age, I would also have had a strong opinion — the opposite one. DC wanted a Core for two (or three) reasons: Didn’t want to be in an environment where there were the STEM kids and the non-STEM kids and ne’er the twain shall meet. Wanted lots of kids who bridged both and to be in a situation where everyone was expected to be interested in/able to understand basics in other fields. Wanted to be broadly educated and to be in a college where that was encouraged/required rather than penalized. (sowouldn’t feel guilty about/like a slacker for taking an arts course rather than another elective within the major). I would have thought “to hell with that — I’m tired of being forced to take some of everything. I want to focus on the subjects I like and ignore the rest and I don’t give a damn what my classmates are doing. I’d rather be in courses with kids who are there by choice not because they are required to be.” |
Easy walk to the lake in Chicago. And lots of bus/subway connections to downtown as well as special weekend shuttles from campus to the South Loop. Don’t know Providence, so not comparing, but UChicago really is in/of Chicago (which has lots of different neighborhoods). DC frequently goes all over the city (Wicker Park, Chinatown, Andersonville, Mag Mile, museums, etc) using bus/subway pass (included in tuition). Uber, and campus shuttle. |
| Bottom line is let her decide. Both are great options. Costs are probably similar. She has to live with her decision; you don’t. Let her start out adulthood deciding what she wants vs. doing what you think is best. |
| Opposite. Brown is far too wacky liberal these days. You don't get a solid liberal arts education because you can take any progressive silly course you like. Chicago has always been the leader in the great books schools, along with columbia and has a more earnest conservative lean. If you child is at all interested in econ, I would definitely pick Chicago. |