Trump Pardons Dinesh D'Souza

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't particularly like Dinesh, and I agree that he did break the law, but this is one of those often-broken laws that gets prosecuted based on who is complaining. In this case, Hilary/Obama pushed for conviction and therefore it was done.

The tin foil is double layered for maximum effectiveness.

[Anonymous]

Trump is pardoning the people who have committed the crimes he himself is afraid of being charged with. The Ultimate Projection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now he is considering a full pardon for Martha Stewart and commuting the sentence of Rod Blagojevich. Since someone earlier was trying to figure out the rationale behind some of this, I may have just heard the answer from your favorite radio host Rush Limbaugh. He mentioned that Comey played a rule in both the Stewart and Blagojevich cases. Soooo maybe he is just trying to undo everything Comey has ever done, kinda like he is doing with Obama? Interesting....

Stewart and Blago were both on the Apprentice.

Trump is showing that he's only here to look out for his friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now he is considering a full pardon for Martha Stewart and commuting the sentence of Rod Blagojevich. Since someone earlier was trying to figure out the rationale behind some of this, I may have just heard the answer from your favorite radio host Rush Limbaugh. He mentioned that Comey played a rule in both the Stewart and Blagojevich cases. Soooo maybe he is just trying to undo everything Comey has ever done, kinda like he is doing with Obama? Interesting....

These are people he identifies with because they were “treated unfairly” by the government — even without “infiltration”

Also he cheated on his wife, so they have that in common.

[Anonymous]

D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

Under what conditions? And was he prosecuted where others weren't?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

Under what conditions? And was he prosecuted where others weren't?

That always happens. Resources are finite.

[Anonymous]

Meh... no problem with this pardon, IMO.

I may show some concern when you start to get outraged about Rosie O’Donnell’s illegal campaign contributions.

And, OP, in regard to this statement.... "So, this should start a trend for president and governor to pardon whoever they feel like pardoning.”

Do some research. You must be terribly young. Look up some of the characters pardoned at the eleventh hour by Bill Clinton.
Then, look up the pardoning power granted the president.

(PS. Elections have consequences.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

Under what conditions? And was he prosecuted where others weren't?

That always happens. Resources are finite.

Resources are finite and so some prosecutions are directed at those who are not politically allied with those in positions of influence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

Under what conditions? And was he prosecuted where others weren't?

That always happens. Resources are finite.

Resources are finite and so some prosecutions are directed at those who are not politically allied with those in positions of influence.

The guy who prosecuted him is an Indian-American and he prosecuted Dems as well as Republicans. He took down the Speaker of the New York Assembly, sentenced to 12 years in prison and $7 million in fines. So you can take your accusation of bias and shove it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

Under what conditions? And was he prosecuted where others weren't?

That always happens. Resources are finite.

Resources are finite and so some prosecutions are directed at those who are not politically allied with those in positions of influence.

That’s about right. Resources are finite. Hahahaha

It was a political hit job for revenge over a movie

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

Under what conditions? And was he prosecuted where others weren't?

That always happens. Resources are finite.

Resources are finite and so some prosecutions are directed at those who are not politically allied with those in positions of influence.

The guy who prosecuted him is an Indian-American and he prosecuted Dems as well as Republicans. He took down the Speaker of the New York Assembly, sentenced to 12 years in prison and $7 million in fines. So you can take your accusation of bias and shove it.

Look at you relying on race. Such a good liberal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

Under what conditions? And was he prosecuted where others weren't?

That always happens. Resources are finite.

Resources are finite and so some prosecutions are directed at those who are not politically allied with those in positions of influence.

The guy who prosecuted him is an Indian-American and he prosecuted Dems as well as Republicans. He took down the Speaker of the New York Assembly, sentenced to 12 years in prison and $7 million in fines. So you can take your accusation of bias and shove it.

Look at you relying on race. Such a good liberal

Amazing how liberals tie everything to race even when no one even brings it up.

[Anonymous]

Why on earth would anybody even consider pardoning Blagojevich??? He was a parody of a corrupt politician.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:D’Souza plead guilty and acknowledged that he knew his actions were illegal. So unfair! Sad!

Under what conditions? And was he prosecuted where others weren't?

That always happens. Resources are finite.

Resources are finite and so some prosecutions are directed at those who are not politically allied with those in positions of influence.

The guy who prosecuted him is an Indian-American and he prosecuted Dems as well as Republicans. He took down the Speaker of the New York Assembly, sentenced to 12 years in prison and $7 million in fines. So you can take your accusation of bias and shove it.

Look at you relying on race. Such a good liberal

Amazing how liberals tie everything to race even when no one even brings it up.

What, racial bias is no longer a subset of political bias?