| In the 60's kids were proud to get in trouble. It's a mark of a good protest. |
Why? |
So write a letter to the Superintendent about that. But don't make it about your kid. She knew the consequence and accepted it. Good for her. |
| Would you prefer the school give you the option of a one-day out-of-school suspension so it's not an "unlawful detainment"? Or are you just looking to get your kid out of any consequences? Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the schools that are giving kids a pass on this, but part of this kind of civic action is learning and weighing the consequences, so I think your child has been given a very valuable lesson here. |
| This has been her battle from the beginning. Let it stay that way. |
What's the point of an "accomodated" walkout? It makes as much sense as a sit-in when you're invited to the dinner. |
| My concern was that the school would invoke truancy perimeters, if the children left campus. NP here. Also, does the school not have in loco parentis status in the case of walk outs? i.e.: Is the schools' allowing the 17 minutes not an exception? Playing devil's advocate here. |
|
Cobb County, GA is giving students a 5 day suspension for a 17-minute walkout that doesn't leave school grounds.
That, I'd protest, but I'd also be proud of my kid for making a sacrifice to do what's right. |
Who should determine the correct political issues for which schools give children a pass? |
I am struggling with this, too. PP here. Also, I wanted the message that the children are sending to be made to the NRA, not the teachers. The teachers did nothing wrong, and should not be punished by having to wrangle children all day today. If the children were at the Capitol, that would be effective. |
Any issue that involves children getting murdered at school should be allowed a "pass". |
C'mon. No surprise here. |
That would actually require some level of effort. People who "protest" today aren't interested in doing much more than changing their Facebook status, or taking a short break from school as long as there are no adverse consequences. |
| She should do the detention. Civil disobedience is "disobedience" after all -- it means that you might face consequences. If you think those consequences are discriminatory/in retaliation for the content of her message, then go to your ACLU chapter. |
The point is facilitating the students' civic involvement, which some schools are doing. The stated reason for the walkout is to commemorate the Parkland victims and other victims of school shootings. In that narrow reading of the point of the walkout, it would be fine for schools to accommodate it, or to say they won't punish kids for it. Kids are being asked to do this regardless, but there's no rule that says some schools can't also buck the system as a whole. |